Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Juvenile Probation Officer Self-Assessed Mental Health Competency as a Predictor of Case Management Practices

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Justice-involved youth endorse high rates of mental health problems. Juvenile probation is the most common disposition in the justice system and juvenile probation officers (JPOs) are crucial for connecting justice-involved youth with appropriate care. We examined the role of mental health competency on the use of self-report case management strategy types (deterrence, restorative justice, and treatment) by JPOs and whether jurisdiction-level differences were relevant. Results suggest that mental health competency predicted use of restorative justice and treatment strategies and all three strategy types varied at the county level. The role of mental health competency in use of treatment strategies is relevant to connecting justice-involved youth to mental health care. Furthermore, a substantial amount of the variance predicting the use of all three strategies was accounted for at the county level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aalsma, M. C., Gudonis, L. C., Jarjoura, G. R., Blythe, M. J., Tong, Y., Harezlak, J., & Rosenman, M. B. (2012a). The consequences of juvenile detention reform for mental health and sexually transmitted infection screening among detained youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50(4), 365–370. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.08.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aalsma, M. C., Schwartz, K., & Perkins, A. J. (2014). A statewide collaboration to initiate mental health screening and assess services for detained youths in Indiana. American Journal of Public Health, 104(10), e82–e88. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2014.302054.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Aalsma, M. C., Tong, Y., Lane, K., Katz, B., & Rosenman, M. B. (2012b). Use of outpatient care by juvenile detainees upon community reentry: Effects of mental health screening and referral. Psychiatric Services, 63(10), 997–1003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alegria, M., Robles, R., Freeman, D. H., Vera, M., Jimenez, A. L., Rios, C., & Rios, R. (1991). Patterns of mental health utilization among island Puerto Rican poor. American Journal of Public Health, 81(7), 875–879.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. A., & Spanier, G. B. (1980). Treatment of delinquent youth. Criminology, 17(4), 505–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Hoge, R. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(1), 19–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazemore, G., & Terry, W. C. (1997). Developing delinquent youths: a reintegrative model for rehabilitation and a new role for the juvenile justice system. Child Welfare, 76(5), 665–716.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bickman, L., Heflinger, C. A., Northrup, D., Sonnichsen, S., & Schilling, S. (1998). Long term outcomes to family caregiver empowerment. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 7(3), 269–282. doi:10.1023/a:1022937327049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, M. A. (1948). Probation is not casework. Federal Probation, 12, 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannan, A. M., & Heflinger, C. A. (2006). Caregiver, child, family, and service system contributors to caregiver strain in two child mental health service systems. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 33, 408–422.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cappon, L., & Vander Laenen, F. (2012). Mental health in juvenile judges’ decision-making: Review of literature. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 36(1), 65–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, J. T. (2010). Sentencing disparities for juvenile offenders sentenced to adult prisons: An individual and contextual analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(4), 747–757. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clear, T., & Latessa, E. (1993). Probation officers’ roles in intensive supervision: Surveillance versus treatment. Justice Quarterly, 10(3), 441–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costello, E. J., Burns, B. J., Costello, A. J., Edelbrock, C., Dulcan, M., & Brent, D. (1988). Service utilization and psychiatric diagnosis in pediatric primary care: The role of the gatekeeper. Pediatrics, 82(3), 435.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dembo, R. (1972). Orientation and activities of the parole officer. Criminology, 10(2), 193–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMichele, M. (2007). Probation and parole’s growing caseloads and workload allocation: Strategies for managerial decision making. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, E. K., Aos, S., & Miller, M. G. (2009). Evidence-based public policy options to reduce crime and criminal justice costs: Implications in Washington state. Victims and Offenders, 4(2), 170–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazel, S., Doll, H., & Långström, N. (2008). Mental disorders among adolescents in juvenile detention and correctional facilities: A systematic review and metaregression analysis of 25 surveys. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 47(9), 1010–1019.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P., & Torbet, P. (2002). Desktop guide to good juvenile probation practice, 2002. No.: ISBN 0-910099-20-0, 138.

  • Grisso, T., & Barnum, R. (2006). Massachusetts youth screening instrument, version 2: MAYSI-2: User’s manual and technical report. Sarasota: Professional Resource Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R. H., Thomas, S. L., & Tabata, L. N. (2013). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling with IBM SPSS (quantitative methodology series) (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heflinger, C. A., & Hinshaw, S. P. (2010). Stigma in child and adolescent mental health services research: understanding professional and institutional stigmatization of youth with mental health problems and their families. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 37(1–2), 61–70. doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0294-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henggeler, S., & Schoenwald, S. J. (2011). Evidence-based interventions for juvenile offenders and juvenile justice policies that support them. Social Policy Report, 25(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeve, M., McReynolds, L. S., & Wasserman, G. A. (2013). Service referral for juvenile justice youths: Associations with psychiatric disorder and recidivism. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 41(3), 379–389. doi:10.1007/s10488-013-0472-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, E. D., Brown, J. R., Suman, P. D., & Aalsma, M. C. (2013). A qualitative examination of juvenile probation officers as gateway providers to mental health care. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 24(3), 370–392. doi:10.1177/0887403412436603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. C. (2003). Preventing and reducing juvenile delinquency: A comprehensive framework. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hox, J. J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications. Quantitative methodology series (Vol. 98). doi: 10.1198/jasa.2003.s281

  • Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Routledge.

  • H. B. 1536, Indiana Code §12-15-1-20 (2009).

  • Indiana State Judicial Center—About Probation. (2015). Retrieved April 29, 2015, from http://www.in.gov/judiciary/probation/2350.htm.

  • Jalbert, S. K., & Rhodes, W. (2012). Reduced caseloads improve probation outcomes. Journal of Crime and Justice, 35(2), 221–238. doi:10.1080/0735648x.2012.679875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komiya, N., Good, G. E., & Sherrod, N. B. (2000). Emotional openness as a predictor of college students’ attitudes toward seeking psychological help. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 138–143. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.47.1.138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J., Miller, J., & Fukushima, M. (2008). Juvenile probation officers’ dispositional recommendations: Predictive factors and their alignment with predictors of recidivism. Journal of Crime and Justice, 31(1), 1–34. doi:10.1080/0735648X.2008.9721242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W. (2009). The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victims & Offenders, 4(2), 124–147. doi:10.1080/15564880802612573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, L. E., & Marshall, W. L. (2012). The risk/needs/responsivity model: The crucial features of general responsivity. Advances in Program Evaluation, 13(1), 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride Murry, V., Heflinger, C. A., VanHooser, S. E. (2007, May). Linking barriers to care and help-seeking behaviors of rural AfricanAmerican families. In Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Rural Health Association.

  • Meeker, B. (1948). Probation is casework. Federal Probation, 12, 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (2013). Contemporary modes of probation officer supervision: The triumph of the “synthetic” officer? Justice Quarterly, 32(2), 314–336. doi:10.1080/07418825.2013.770546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohlin, L. E., Piven, H., & Pappenfort, D. (1956). Major dilemmas of the social worker in probation and parole. National Probation and Parole Association Journal, 2(3), 211–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Privileged communication to a mental health evaluator; exceptions, Indiana Code § 31-37-8-4.5 (2007).

  • Puzzanchera, C., & Kang, W. (2012). Easy access to juvenile court statistics: 1985–2009, from http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezajcs/.

  • Rosecrance, J. (1986). Probation supervision: mission impossible. Federal Probation, 50(1), 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Structural variations in juvenile court processing: inequality, the underclass, and social control. Law & Society Review, 27(2), 285–311. doi:10.2307/3053938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwalbe, C. S., & Maschi, T. (2009a). Confronting delinquency: probations officers’ use of coercion and client-centered tactics to foster youth compliance. Crime & Delinquency, 57(5), 801–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwalbe, C., & Maschi, T. (2009b). Investigating probation strategies with juvenile offenders: the influence of officers’ attitudes and youth characteristics. Law and Human Behavior, 33(5), 357–367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shearer, R. A. (2002). Probation strategies of juvenile and adult pre-service trainees. Federal Probation, 66(1), 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sluder, R. D., & Reddington, F. P. (1993). An empirical examination of the work ideologies of juvenile and adult probation officers. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 20(1–2), 115–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, B., Purkiss, M., Kifer, M., Roberts, E., & Hemmens, C. (2004). Legally prescribed functions of adult and juvenile probation officers – worlds apart? Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 39(4), 47–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, B., Travis, L. F, I. I. I., Makarios, M. D., & Brickley, T. (2011). The influence of parole officers’ attitudes on supervision practices. Justice Quarterly, 28(6), 903–927. doi:10.1080/07418825.2010.539246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiffman, A., Hadley-Ives, E., Dore, P., Polgar, M., Horvath, V., Striley, C., & Elze, D. (2000). Youths’ access to mental health services: The role of providers’ training, resource connectivity, and assessment of need. Mental Health Services Research, 2(3), 141–154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stiffman, A., Pescosolido, B., & Cabassa, L. (2004). Building a model to understand youth service access: The gateway provider model. Mental Health Services Research, 6(4), 189–198.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Teplin, L. A., Abram, K. M., McClelland, G. M., Mericle, A. A., Dulcan, M. K., Washburn, J. J., & Butt, S. (2006). Psychiatric disorders of youth in detention. In A. Aarons, et al. (Eds.), The mental health needs of young offenders: Forging paths toward reintegration and rehabilitation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torbet, P. (1993). Desktop guide to good juvenile justice practice. Juvenile Probation Officer Initiative Working Group. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

  • Vidal, S., & Skeem, J. L. (2007). Effect of psychopathy, abuse, and ethnicity on juvenile probation officers’ decision-making and supervision strategies. Law and Human Behavior, 31(5), 479–498. doi:10.2307/4499550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, G. M., Guy, L. S., Gershenson, B. G., & McCabe, P. (2012a). Does risk assessment make a difference? Results of implementing the SAVRY in juvenile probation. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 30(4), 384–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, G. M., Guy, L. S., & Grisso, T. (2012b). Risk assessment in juvenile justice: A guidebook for implementation. Chicago: John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, A. (1985). The role of the probation officer in the sentencing process: independent professional or judicial hack? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12(3), 289–303. doi:10.1177/0093854885012003002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, G. A., McReynolds, L. S., Ko, S. J., Katz, L. M., & Carpenter, J. R. (2005). Gender differences in psychiatric disorders at juvenile probation intake. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 131.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, G. A., McReynolds, L. S., Musabegovic, H., Whited, A. L., Keating, J. M., & Huo, Y. (2009). Evaluating Project Connect: Improving juvenile probationers’ mental health and substance use service access. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 36(6), 393–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, G. A., McReynolds, L. S., Whited, A. L., Keating, J. M., Musabegovic, H., & Huo, Y. (2008). Juvenile probation officers’ mental health decision making. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 35(5), 410–422.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Worrall, J. L., Schram, P., Hays, E., & Newman, M. (2004). An analysis of the relationship between probation caseloads and property crime rates in California counties. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32(3), 231–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by Grant R40 MC 08721, through the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Research Program and the Indiana Criminal Justice Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evan D. Holloway.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Holloway, E.D., Cruise, K.R., Downs, S.M. et al. Juvenile Probation Officer Self-Assessed Mental Health Competency as a Predictor of Case Management Practices. Adm Policy Ment Health 44, 534–546 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-016-0734-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-016-0734-5

Keywords

Navigation