Skip to main content
Log in

The best EBLUP in the Fay–Herriot model

  • Published:
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We show that in the case of Fay–Herriot model for small area estimation, there is an estimator of the variance of the random effects so that the resulting EBLUP is the best in the sense that it minimizes the leading term in the asymptotic expansion of the mean squared error (MSE) of the EBLUP. In particular, in the balanced case, i.e., when the sampling variances are equal, this best EBLUP has the minimal MSE in the exact sense. We also propose a modified Prasad–Rao MSE estimator which is second-order unbiased and show that it is less biased than the jackknife MSE estimator in a suitable sense in the balanced case. A real data example is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Datta G.S., Lahiri P. (2000) A unified measure of uncertainty of estimated best linear unbiased predictors in small area estimation problems. Statistica Sinica 10: 613–627

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Datta G.S., Rao J.N.K., Smith D.D. (2005) On measuring the variability of small area estimators under a basic area level model. Biometrika 92: 183–196

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fay R.E., Herriot R.A. (1979) Estimates of income for small places: An application of James–Stein procedures to census data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74: 269–277

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ganesh N. (2009) Simultaneous credible intervals for small area estimation problems. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 100: 1610–1621

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang J. (2007) Linear and generalized linear mixed models and their applications. Springer, New York, p 16

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang J., Lahiri P. (2006) Mixed model prediction and small area estimation (with discussion). TEST 15: 1–96

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang J., Lahiri P., Wan S. (2002) A unified jackknife theory for empirical best prediction with M-estimation. Annals of Statistics 30: 1782–1810

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Morris C.N., Christiansen C.L. (1996) Hierarchical models for ranking and for identifying extremes with applications. In: Bernardo J.M., Berger J.O., Dawid A.P., Smith A.F.M. (eds) Bayes statistics (Vol. 5). Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 277–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffermann D., Nathan G. (1981) Regression analysis of data from a cluster sample. Journal of the American Statistical Association 76: 681–689

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad N.G.N., Rao J.N.K. (1990) The estimation of mean squared errors of small area estimators. Journal of the American Statistical Association 85: 163–171

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rao J.N.K. (2003) Small area estimation. Wiley, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Searle S.R. (1982) Matrix algebra useful for statistics. Wiley, New York, p 312

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Searle S.R., Casella G., McCulloch C.E. (1992) Variance components. Wiley, New York, p 467

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava V.K., Tiwari R. (1976) Evaluation of expectation of products of stochastic matrices. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 3: 135–138

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, E.-T. (2008). On the estimation of the mean squared error in small area estimation and related topics. Ph.D. dissertation. Davis, CA: Department of Statistics, University of California.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiming Jiang.

About this article

Cite this article

Jiang, J., Tang, ET. The best EBLUP in the Fay–Herriot model. Ann Inst Stat Math 63, 1123–1140 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10463-010-0281-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10463-010-0281-x

Keywords

Navigation