Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Farmer-Community Connections and the Future of Ecological Agriculture in California

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While questions about the environmental sustainability of contemporary farming practices and the socioeconomic viability of rural communities are attracting increasing attention throughout the US, these two issues are rarely considered together. This paper explores the current and potential connections between these two aspects of sustainability, using data on community members’ and farmers’ views of agricultural issues in California’s Central Valley. These views were collected from a series of individual and group interviews with biologically oriented and conventional farmers as well as community stakeholders. Local marketing, farmland preservation, and perceptions of sustainable agriculture comprised the primary topics of discussion. The mixed results indicate that, while many farmers and community members have a strong interest in these topics, sustainable community development and the use of sustainable farming practices are seldom explicitly linked. On the other hand, many separate efforts around the Valley to increase local marketing and agritourism, improve public education about agriculture, and organize grassroots farmland preservation initiatives were documented. We conclude that linking these efforts more explicitly to sustainable agriculture and promoting more engagement between ecologically oriented farmers and their communities could engender more economic and political support for these farmers, helping them and their communities to achieve greater sustainability in the long run.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • P. Allen C. Sachs (1993) “Sustainable agriculture in the United States: Engagements, silences, and possibilities for transformation” P. Allen (Eds) Food for the Future: Conditions and Contradictions for Sustainability John Wiley and Sons New York, New York 139–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Benbrook, C. (2001). “Poorly served – the consumer and grower voice in the policy process.” Paper presented at the Conference on Partnerships for Sustaining California Agriculture: Profit, Environment, and Community, March 27–28, 2001, Woodland, California. University of California Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program.

  • E. Bird G. Bultena J. Gardner (Eds) (1995) Planting the Future: Developing an Agriculture that Sustains Land and Community Iowa State University Press Ames

    Google Scholar 

  • S. R. Brown (1980) Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science Yale University Press New Haven, Connecticut

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Campbell (1997) ArticleTitle“Community-controlled economic development as a strategic vision for the sustainable agriculture movement” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 12 IssueID1 37–44

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Campbell G. Feenstra (2001) “A local partnership for sustainable food and agriculture: The case of PlacerGROWN” M. R. Daniels (Eds) Creating Sustainable Community Programs: Examples of Collaborative Public Administration Praeger Westport, Connecticut 205–220

    Google Scholar 

  • J. S. Coleman (1990) Foundations of Social Theory Belknap Press Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • CAFF, (Community Alliance with Family Farmers) (n.d.). “Programs: Biologically Integrated Orchard Systems.” Accessed on July 7, 2005 at http://www.caff.org/programs/bios.shtml.

  • K. A. Dahlberg (1993) “Regenerative food systems: Broadening the scope and agenda of sustainability” P. Allen (Eds) Food for the Future: Conditions and Contradictions of Sustainability John Wiley and Sons New York, New York 75–102

    Google Scholar 

  • T. L. Dobbs J. D. Cole (1992) ArticleTitle“Potential effects on rural economies of conversion to sustainable farming systems” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 7 IssueID1&2 70–80

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2000) The Quality of Our Nation’s Waters. A Summary of the National Water Quality Inventory: 1998 Report to Congress EPA 841-S-00-001 US EPA Office of Water Washington, District of Columbia

    Google Scholar 

  • G. W. Feenstra (1997) ArticleTitle“Local food systems and sustainable communities” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 12 IssueID1 28–36

    Google Scholar 

  • C. B. Flora (1990) “Sustainability of agriculture and rural communities” C. A. Francis C. B. Flora L. D. King (Eds) Sustainable Agriculture in Temperate Zones John Wiley & Sons New York, New York 343–359

    Google Scholar 

  • C. B. Flora (1995) ArticleTitle“Social capital and sustainability: Agriculture and communities in the Great Plains and corn belt” Research in Rural Sociology and Development 6 227–246

    Google Scholar 

  • C. B. Flora (2001) “Shifting agroecosystems and communities” C. B. Flora (Eds) Interactions Between Agroecosystems and Rural Communities CRC Press Boca Raton, Florida 5–12

    Google Scholar 

  • D. W. Griffin C. A. Kellogg V. H. Garrison E. A. Shinn (2002) ArticleTitle“The global transport of dust: An intercontinental river of dust, microorganisms and toxic chemicals flows through the Earth’s atmosphere” American Scientist 90 IssueID3 228–235 Occurrence Handle10.1511/2002.3.228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Goldschmidt (1947) As You Sow Harcourt, Brace & Co New York

    Google Scholar 

  • M. E. Handel (1998) ArticleTitle“Conflicts arise on the urban fringe” California Agriculture 52 IssueID3 11–16

    Google Scholar 

  • E. O. Hoiberg G. L. Bultena J. Dansingburg (1995) “How some farmers perceive the impact of sustainable agriculture” E. A. R. Bird G. L. Bultena J. C. Gardner (Eds) Planting the Future: Developing an Agriculture that Sustains Land and Community Iowa State University Ames 55–56

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Kegley L. Neumeister T. Martin (1999) Disrupting the Balance: Ecological Impacts of Pesticides in California Pesticide Action Network North America Regional Center San Francisco, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschenmann, F. (1992). What can alternative farming systems and rural communities do for each other? In Symposium Proceedings: Alternative Farming Systems and Rural Communities: Exploring the Connections (pp. 25–38). Greenbelt, Maryland: Institute for Alternative Agriculture.

  • P. Lasley E. Hoiberg G. Bultena (1993) ArticleTitle“Is sustainable agriculture an elixir for rural communities?” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 8 IssueID3 133–139

    Google Scholar 

  • L. M. Lobao (1990) Locality and Inequality: Farm and Industry Structure and Socioeconomic Conditions State University of New York Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • LWWC, (Lodi-Woodbridge Winegrape Commission) (2002). Mission Statement and Objective. Accessed on July 3, 2005 at http://www.lodiwine.com/missionstatement1.shtml.

  • T. A. Lyson G. W. Gillespie SuffixJr. D. Hilchey (1995) ArticleTitle“Farmers’ markets and the local community: Bridging the formal and informal economy” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 10 IssueID3 108–113

    Google Scholar 

  • P. L. Martin J. E. Taylor (2000) ArticleTitle“For California farmworkers, future holds little prospect for change” California Agriculture 54 IssueID1 19–25

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Medvitz A. D. Sokolow (1995) ArticleTitle“Population growth threatens agriculture, open space” California Agriculture 49 IssueID6 11–14, 17

    Google Scholar 

  • R. D. Putnam (1995) ArticleTitle“Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital” Journal of Democracy 6 IssueID1 65–78

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Stephenson (1953) The Study of Behavior: Q-Technique and Its Methodology The University of Chicago Press Chicago, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Stevenson M. Gibbs J. Klein (1998) Biologically Integrated Orchard Systems (BIOS): 1998 Year-End Report Community Alliance with Family Farmers Davis, California

    Google Scholar 

  • J. E. Taylor P. L. Martin (2000) ArticleTitle“Central Valley evolving into patchwork of poverty and prosperity” California Agriculture 54 IssueID1 26–32

    Google Scholar 

  • C. M. Tolbert T. A. Lyson M. D. Irwin (1998) ArticleTitle“Social capitalism, civic engagement, and socioeconomic well-being” Social Forces 77 IssueID2 401–427

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Villarejo D. Lighthall D. Williams SuffixIII A. Souter R. Mines B. Bade S. Samuels (2000) Suffering in Silence: A Report on the Health of California’s Agricultural Workers Institute for Rural Studies and The California Endowment Davis, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, R. and T. A. Lyson (2001). Anti-corporate farming laws, the ‘Goldschmidt hypothesis’ and rural community welfare. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Rural Sociological Society, Alburquerque, New Mexico. August 15–19, 2001.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gail Feenstra.

Additional information

Sonja Brodt is a former program evaluation specialist with the University of California Integrated Pest Management Program. Her current research focuses on extension and adoption of integrated pest management strategies by California growers and the impacts of pesticide safety training programs on farmworkers.

Gail Feenstra is a food systems analyst at the University of California Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program (SAREP). She coordinates SAREP’s Community Development and Public Policy grants program and conducts outreach and education to academic and community-based groups to build their capacity and leadership skills for developing sustainable community food systems.

Robin Kozloff is a social science researcher and consultant in agricultural and land use policy.

Karen Klonsky is an extension specialist at the University of California at Davis in the Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics. Her research focuses on the economic viability of organic and sustainable farming systems as well as the evolution of the organic market.

Laura Tourte is county director and farm advisor at the University of California Cooperative Extension in Santa Cruz County. Her research and extension activities currently focus on farm management and marketing for small-scale growers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brodt, S., Feenstra, G., Kozloff, R. et al. Farmer-Community Connections and the Future of Ecological Agriculture in California. Agric Hum Values 23, 75–88 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-004-5870-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-004-5870-y

Key words

Navigation