Abstract
Peer Physical Examination (PPE) is an educational tool used globally for learning early clinical skills and anatomy. In quantitative research, there are differences in students’ preferences and actual participation in PPE by gender. This novel study qualitatively explores the effect that gender has on medical students’ experiences of learning physical examination through PPE. We employ an interpretative approach to uncover the PPE experiences of students from a European, graduate-entry medical school. Volunteers participated in either individual or group interviews. The data were transcribed, de-identified and analysed using thematic analysis. There was evidence of gender inequity in PPE, with students describing significant imbalances in participation. Male students adopted roles that generated significant personal discomfort and led to fewer experiences as examiners. Assumptions were made by tutors and students about gender roles: male students’ ready acceptance of exposure to be examined and female students’ need to be protected from particular examinations. In contrast with the first assumption, male students did feel coerced or obliged to be examined. Students described their experiences of taking action to break down the gender barrier. Importantly, students reported that tutors played a role in perpetuating inequities. These findings, whilst relating to one university, have implications for all settings where PPE is used. Educators should be vigilant about gender issues and the effect that they may have on students’ participation in PPE to ensure that students are not disadvantaged in their learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abraham, S. (1995). Vaginal and speculum examination in medical curricula. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 35, 56–60.
Adler, P. A. & Adler, P. (2012). Expert voices. In S. E. Baker & R. Edwards (Eds.), How many qualitative interviews is enough? National Centre for Research Methods Paper (pp. 8–11). http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2273/.
Braun, V., & Clark, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
Braunack-Mayer, A. J. (2001). Should medical students act as surrogate patients for each other? Medical Education, 35, 681–686.
Carroll, K., Iedema, R., & Kerridge, R. (2008). Reshaping ICU ward round practices using video-reflexive ethnography. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 380–390.
Chang, E. H., & Power, D. V. (2000). Are medical students comfortable with practicing physical examinations on each other? Academic Medicine, 75, 384–389.
Chen, J. Y., Yip, A. L. M., Lam, C. L. K., & Patil, N. G. (2011). Does medical student willingness to practise peer physical examination translate into action? Med Teach, 33, e528–e540.
Cleland, J. A., Johnston, P. W., Anthony, M., Khan, N. & Scott, N. W. (2014). A survey of factors influencing career preference in new-entrant and exiting medical students from four UK medical schools. BMC Medical Education, 14, 151. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/14/151.
Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
Cramblitt, B., & Pritchard, M. (2013). Media’s influence on the drive for muscularity in undergraduates. Eating Behaviors, 14, 441–446.
Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, special issue: Feminism in the Law: Theory, Practice and Criticism, 140, 139–167.
Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. London: SAGE.
Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9, 67–85.
Duvivier, R. J., van Dalen, J., Muijtjens, A. M., Moulaert, V., Van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Scherpbier, A. J. J. A. (2011). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of clinical skills. BMC Medical Education, 11, 101.
Duvivier, R. J., van Geel, K., van Dalen, J., Van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Scherpbier, A. J. J. A. (2012). Learning clinical skills outside timetabled training sessions. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 17, 339–355.
Edwards, D. (1998). The relevant thing about her: Social identity categories in use. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in Talk (pp. 15–33). London: Sage.
Edwards, T. (2006). Cultures of masculinity. London, NY: Routledge.
Engestrom, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Orienta-Konsultit, Oy: Helsinki.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper.
Kaufman, M. (1994). Men, feminism, and men’s contradictory experiences of power. In H. Brod & M. Kaufman (Eds.), Theorising masculinities (pp. 142–163). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Koehler, N., Currey, J., & McMenamin, C. (2014). What should be included in a peer physical examination policy and procedure? Medical Science Education, 24, 379–385.
Koehler, N., & McMenamin, C. (2014). The need for a peer physical examination policy within Australian medical schools. Medical Teacher, 36, 430–433.
Lykke, N. (2010). Feminist studies: A guide to intersectional theory, methodology and writing. New York, NY: Routledge.
Mason, M. (2010). Sample size and saturation in PhD Studies using qualitative interviews. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11, Art 8. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1428/3027 Accessed 27 September 2015.
McConnell-Ginet, S. (2003). “What’s in a Name?” Social labeling and gender practices. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (pp. 69–97). Maiden: Blackwell Publishing.
Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (Eds.). (2006). Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. London and New York: Routledge.
Monrouxe, L. V. (2015). When I say…intersectionality in medical education research. Medical Education, 49, 21–22.
Morse, J. M. (1994). Designing funded qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 220–235). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Newton, B. W., Barber, L., Clardy, J., Cleveland, E., & O’Sullivan, P. (2008). Is there hardening of the heart during medical school? Academic Medicine, 83, 244–249.
O’Neill, P. A., Larcombe, C., Duffy, K., & Dornan, T. L. (1998). Medical students’ willingness and reactions to learning basic skills through examining fellow students. Medical Teacher, 20, 433–437.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Rees, C. E. (2007). The influence of gender on student willingness to engage in peer physical examination: The practical implications of feminist theory of body image. Medical Education, 41, 801–807.
Rees, C. E., Wearn, A. M., Vnuk, A., & Sato, T. J. (2009). Medical students’ attitudes towards peer physical examination: Findings from an international cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14, 103–121.
Reid, K., Sutherland, R., Dodds, A., McNair, R., & Pierce, D. (2015). Abdomen and chest examinations in peer physical examination: Variation in participation by gender. FOHPE, 16, 13–26.
Selleger, V. J., Bonke, B., & Leeman, Y. A. M. (2006). Student diversity at Erasmus medical centre Rotterdam: Does it make any difference? Medical Teacher, 28, e142–e148.
Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative Psychology: A practical guide to research methods (2nd ed., pp. 53–80). Los Angeles: Sage.
Talbot, M. (2010). Language and gender (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Tsouroufli, M., Rees, C. E., Monrouxe, L. V., & Sundaram, V. (2011). Gender, identities and intersectionality in medical education research. Medical Education, 45, 213–216.
Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany, NY: University of New York Press.
Verdonk, P., Benschop, Y. W. M., De Haes, H. C. J. M., & Lagro-Janssen, T. L. M. (2009). From gender bias to gender awareness in medical education. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14, 135–152.
Verghese, A. (2009). A touch of sense. Health Affairs, 28, 1177–1182.
Wearn, A., & Bhoopatkar, H. (2006). Evaluation of consent for peer physical examination: Students reflect on their clinical skills learning experience. Medical Education, 40, 957–964.
Wearn, A., & Bhoopatkar, H. (2014). Experience of a peer physical examination policy within a New Zealand medical programme. Medical Teacher, 36, 826–827.
Wearn, A. M., Rees, C. E., Bradley, P., & Vnuk, A. K. (2008). Understanding student concerns about peer physical examination using an activity theory framework. Medical Education, 42, 1218–1226.
World Health Organisation. (2001). Madrid Statement, Mainstreaming gender equity in health: The need to move forward. Spain: Madrid, 14 September 2001. Retrieved December 17, 2007, from World Health Organisation website: http://www.euro.who.int/document/a75328.pdf.
Acknowledgments
The first author would like to thank the supervisors of her higher degree thesis and the students at the host university who participated in the research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vnuk, A.K., Wearn, A. & Rees, C.E. The influence of students’ gender on equity in Peer Physical Examination: a qualitative study. Adv in Health Sci Educ 22, 653–665 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9699-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9699-0