Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Education as ehealth infrastructure: considerations in advancing a national agenda for ehealth

  • Reflections
  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the role of education as infrastructure in large-scale ehealth strategies—in theory, in international practice and in one national case study. Education is often invisible in the documentation of ehealth infrastructure. Nevertheless a review of international practice shows that there is significant educational investment made in implementing national ehealth agendas. Disparate views about the role of education are implicit in the ehealth strategy literature, while there is a shortage of evidence-based accounts of ehealth education. In the case of Australia, the benefits and challenges of a broadly collaborative approach to ehealth education are highlighted through activities of various types occurring on many levels to support the implementation of a national ehealth system. This paper concludes that although evidence-based practice is a given in other areas of healthcare, and although there are many published evaluations of ehealth usability and acceptance in the health informatics literature, there is surprisingly little evidence about what works and doesn’t work with regard to the ehealth education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, M., Fliart, R., Burgess, L., & Poropatich, R. (2010). Developing next-generation tele-health tools and technologies: Patients, systems, and data perspectives. Telemedicine and e-health, 16, 93–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ACT Health. (2010). Clinical repository implementation planning study version 2.4; 25 Oct 2010. Retrieved 12th June 2012 from http://health.act.gov.au/c/health?a=da&policy=1288587229&did=10107160&sid.

  • Al-Qirim, N. (2005). Critical success factors for strategic telemedicine planning in New Zealand. Telemedicine and eHealth, 11, 600–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, A. D., Car, J., Pagliari, C., Anandan, C., Cresswell, K., et al. (2011). The impact of ehealth on the quality and safety of health: A systematic overview. PLoS Medicine, 8, e1000387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brebner, J., Brebner, E., & Ruddick-Bracken, H. (2005). Experience-based guidelines for the implementation of telemedicine services. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 11(Suppl. 1), 3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock Martin, A., Probst, J., Shah, K., Chen, Z., & Garr, D. (2012). Differences in readiness between rural hospitals and primary care providers for telemedicine adoptions and implementation: Findings from a statewide telemedicine survey. Journal of Rural Health, 28, 8–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buntin, M., Jain, S., & Blumenthal, D. (2010). Health information technology: Laying the infrastructure for national health reform. Health Affairs, 29, 1214–1219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Careconnect. (2009). SA Strategic Directions 2009–10 to 2016–2017. Retrieved 3rd July 2012 from http://www.sahealth.sa.gov.au/wps/wcm/connect/public+content/sa+health+internet/health+reform/ehealth.

  • Carlfjord, S., Lindberg, M., Bendtsen, P., Nilsen, P., & Andersson, A. (2010). Key factors influencing adoption of an innovation in primary health care: A qualitative study based on implementation theory. BMC Family Practice, 11, 60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J., Baker, B., & Baker, D. (2009). Getting ehealth into basic nursing education: Report of the RCN information in nursing project. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 146, 534–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • da Silva K., Meier F., Sanches F., Simonette M., & Spina, E. (2010). Needs for a systems engineering process based on human factors for ehealth systems implementation. Pages 43–46 in Proceedings of the 2010 Pan American Health Care Exchange (PAHCE), 15–19 March 2010, Lima, Peru.

  • Deloitte. (2006). Queensland Health ehealth strategy. 12 Sep 2006. Retrieved 8th June 2012 from http://www.health.qld.gov.au/ehealth/docs/eh_strat_public.pdf.

  • Department of Health and Ageing. (2012). eHealth. [website]. Retrieved 6th Sep 2012 from http://www.ehealth.gov.au/internet/ehealth/publishing.nsf/content/home.

  • Department of Health Victoria. (2010). Victorian health sector information, communication and technology (ICT) vision and framework, 2009–13. Retrieved June 12, 2012, from http://www.health.vic.gov.au/ictstrategy/.

  • Edirippulige, S., Smith, A., Armfield, N., Bensinck, M., & Wootton, R. (2012). Student perceptions of a hands-on practicum to supplement an online ehealth course. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14, e182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Exworthy, M., & Powell, M. (2012). Case studies in health policy: An introduction. In M. Exworthy, S. Peckham, M. Powell, & A. Hann (Eds.), Shaping health policy: Case study methods and analysis (pp. 3–20). Bristol UK: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon M., Legare F., Labrecque M., Fremont P., Pluye P., Gagnon J., Car J., Pagliazi C., Desmartis M., Turcot L., & Gravel K. (2009). Interventions for promoting information and communication technologies adoption in healthcare professionals (Review). The Cochrane Library; 2.

  • Gray, K., Dattakumar, A., Maeder, A., & Chenery, H. (2011). Educating future clinicians about clinical informatics: A review of implementation and evaluation cases. European Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 7, 48–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, T., Hinder, S., Stramer, K., Bratan, R., & Russell, J. (2010). Adoption, non-adoption, and abandonment of a personal electronic health record: Case study of HealthSpace. British Medical Journal, 341, c5184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halford, S., Oberfelder, A., & Lotherington, A. (2009). Beyond implementation and resistance: How the delivery of ICT policy is reshaping healthcare. Policy and Politics, 37, 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M. (2012). Troubling theory in case study research. Higher Education Research and Development, 31, 393–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Health Workforce Australia. (2012). Work Programs. [website]. Retrieved 5th July 2012 from http://www.hwa.gov.au/work-programs.

  • Jones, T. (2004). National infrastructure for ehealth: Considerations for decision support. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 100, 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoja, S., Durrani, H., Nayani, P., & Fahim, A. (2012). Scope of policy issues in ehealth: Results from a structured literature review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14, e34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, D., & Kirkpatrick, J. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd Edition). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyratsis, Y., Ahmad, R., & Holmes, A. (2012). Technology adoption and implementation in organisations: Comparative case studies of 12 English NHS Trusts. British Medical Journal Open, 2, e00872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makela, K., Virjo, I., Aho, J., Kalliola, P., Kurunmaki, H., Uusitalo, L., et al. (2010). Management of electronic patient record systems in primary healthcare in a Finnish county. Telemedicine and e-health, 16, 1017–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, C., Finch, T., Cornford, J., Exley, C., Gately, C., Kirk, S., et al. (2011). Integrating telecare for chronic disease management in the community: What needs to be done? BMC Health Services Research, 11, 131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A., Robertson, A., Cresswell, K., Crowe, S., & Sheik, A. (2011). Understanding contrasting approaches to nationwide implementation of electronic health record systems: England, the USA and Australia. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2, 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National E-Health Transition Authority. (2011a). NEHTA blueprint. V2.0. NEHTA, Sydney, 30 Sep 2011. Retrieved 3rd July 2012 from http://www.nehta.gov.au.

  • National E-Health Transition Authority. (2011b). NEHTA strategic plan Refresh 2011/2012. NEHTA, Sydney, 2011. Retrieved 6th July 2012 from http://www.nehta.gov.au/about-us/strategy.

  • National Health and Hospitals Network for Australia’s Future—Delivering the reforms. (2010). Stream 8—eHealth. Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved 3rd July 2012 from http://yourhealth.gov.au/internet/yourhealth/publishing.nsf/Content/DeliveringTheReforms.

  • National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission. (2009). The Australian health care system and the potential for efficiency gains: A review of the literature. Retrieved 3rd July 2012 from http://www.health.gov.au/internet/nhhrc/publishing.nsf/Content/nhhrc-report.

  • Nembhard, I., Alexander, J., Hoff, T., & Ramanujam, R. (2009). Why does the quality of health care continue to lag? Insights from management research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23, 24–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NHS Connecting for Health. (no date). Retrieved 7th May 2012 from http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/.

  • NSW Health. (2007). Health Technology/NSW Health. eMR learning and development strategy. 9 May 2007.

  • Northern Territory. (2008). Strategic Information Plan 2009–2012. Darwin: Department of Health and Families, Northern Territory Government.

  • Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. (no date). Retrieved 7th May 2012 from http://www.healthit.hhs.gov.

  • Ovretveit, J., Scott, R., Rundall, T., Shortell, S., & Brommels, M. (2007). Improving quality through effective implementation of information technology in healthcare. International Journal of Quality in Health Care, 19, 259–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan-Canadian Change Management Network. (2011). A framework and toolkit for managing ehealth change: People and processes. Canada Health Infoway, Montreal, May 2011. Retrieved 7th May 2012 from https://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/index.php/resources/guides-workbooks.

  • Pressman, J., & Wildavsky, A. (1984). Implementation (2nd ed.). Berkeley CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby M., Hulm C., Detmer D., & Buccoliero L. (2007). Enabling the safe and effective implementation of health informatics systems—validating and rolling out the ECDL/ICDL Health Supplement [online]. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 129, 1347–1351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, M., & Romas, J. (2002). Theoretical foundations of health education and health promotion (2nd ed.). Sudbury MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheik, A., Cornford, T., Barber, N., Avery, A., Takian, A., Lichtner, V., et al. (2011). Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: Final qualitative results from prospective national evaluation in “early adopter” hospitals. British Medical Journal, 343, d6054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J., & Tan, J. (2011). Healthcare information technologies in an era of healthcare reform: A complex adaptive system perspective. In L. Wolper (Ed.), Healthcare administration: Managing organized delivery systems (5th ed., pp. 359–400). Sudbury MA: Jones & Bartlett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, H., & Tan, J. (2005). Mapping ehealth strategies: Thinking outside the traditional healthcare box. International Journal of Electronic Healthcare, 1, 261–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiljer, D., Urowitz, S., Apatu, E., DeLenardo, C., Eysenbach, G., Harth, T., et al. (2008). Patient accessible electronic health records: Exploring recommendations for successful implementation strategies. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 10, e34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2011). Atlas eHealth country profiles: Based on the findings of the second global survey on eHealth. WHO press, Geneva. (Global Observatory for eHealth Series, 1). Retrieved 12th May 2012 from www.who.int/goe/publications/ehealth_series_vol1/en/index.html.

  • World Health Organization and International Telecommunication Union. (2012). National eHealth strategy toolkit. Geneva: WHO Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrede, S. (2010). How country matters: Studying health policy in a comparative perspective. In I. Bourgeault, R. Dingwall, & R. De Vries (Eds.), Sage handbook of qualitative methods in health research (pp. 88–105). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the constructive comments by a reviewer that made key contributions to the structure of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lead Vantage P/L, Sydney, Australia

    Sonya Hilberts

  2. The University of Melbourne, Level 1, 202 Berkeley Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia

    Kathleen Gray

Authors
  1. Sonya Hilberts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kathleen Gray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathleen Gray.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hilberts, S., Gray, K. Education as ehealth infrastructure: considerations in advancing a national agenda for ehealth. Adv in Health Sci Educ 19, 115–127 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-013-9442-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-013-9442-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation