Skip to main content
Log in

Post-passage movement of the fluvial fish Zacco temminckii following upstream transportation by a fishway operation in dam

  • Published:
Aquatic Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The multipurpose Jangheung Dam, which was constructed in 2006 on the upper reaches of the Tamjin River, has a trapping and trucking fishway installed next to the dam outlet to facilitate the upstream migration of fish. In this study, the movement of the fluvial specialist Zacco temminckii that did not show distinct spawning migration was examined in a lentic environment following transportation to the reservoir above the dam. In total, 15 fish were tagged with coded acoustic transmitters (n = 11) and acoustic depth transmitters (n = 4). Thirteen of these fish moved to adjacent tributaries (2 individuals died following release), 9 of which travelled directly, and 4 of which became disorientated, travelling back and forth before finding a tributary. There was no significant relationship between fish characteristics and the tributaries to which the fish moved (Kruskal–Wallis test, p > 0.05). All 4 fish that were tagged with depth transmitters demonstrated vertical migration, stayed to relatively deep water 2 h before and after sunrise and sunset, respectively (Mann–Whitney U test, p < 0.05), although there were slight differences in migration time and depth between individuals. Although monitoring conducted small-sized reservoir, all of tagged fish (except 2 individuals) were randomly and successfully moved to tributaries under lentic environment. Consequently, it is expected that other fluvial fish species may exhibit similar movement patterns to Z. temminckii, although further research is required. Additionally, a wider range of release sites should be useful for trapping and trucking operations to reduce the amount of energy being expended whilst searching for tributaries and to allow stocks that have previously become fragmented by the dam to remix more effectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Allan JD, Flecker AS (1993) Biodiversity conservation in running waters. Bioscience 43:32–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonio RR, Agostinho AA, Pelicice FM, Bailly D, Okada EK, Dias JHP (2007) Blockage of migration routes by dam construction: can migratory fish find alternative routes? Neotrop Ichthyol 5:177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bain MB, Finn JT (1988) Streamflow regulation and fish community structure. Ecology 69:382–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benstead JP, March JG, Pringle CM, Scatena FN (1999) Effects of a low-head dam and water abstraction on migratory tropical stream biota. Ecol Appl 9:656–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruton MN (1995) Have fish had their chips? The dilemma of threatened fishes. Environ Biol Fish 43:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke AD, Telmer KH, Shrimpton JM (2007) Habitat use and movement patterns for a fluvial species, the Arctic grayling, in a watershed impacted by a large reservoir: evidence from otolith microchemistry. J Appl Ecol 44:1156–1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clay CH (1995) Design of fishways and other fish facilities. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming GS (2004) The impact of low-head dams on fish species richness in Wisconsin, USA. Ecol Appl 14:1495–1506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehrke PC, Gilligan DM, Barwick M (2002) Changes in fish community of the Shoalhaven River 20 years after construction of Tallowa dam, Australia. River Res Appl 18:265–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godinho AL, Kynard B (2008) Migratory fishes of Brazil: life history and fish passage needs. River Res Appl 25:702–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habit E, Belk MC, Parra O (2007) Response of the riverine fish community to the construction and operation of a diversion hydropower plant in central Chile. Aquat Conserv 17:37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris JH (1984) Impoundment of coastal drainages of south-eastern Australia and a review of its relevance to fish migration. Aust Zool 21:235–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfman GS, Meyer JL, McFarland WN (1982) The ontogeny of twilight migration patterns in grunts (Pisces: Haemulidae). Anim Behav 30:317–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson N, Jonsson B (2002) Migration of anadromous brown trout Salmo trutta in a Norwegian river. Freshw Biol 47:1391–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim IS, Park JY (2002) Freshwater fishes of Korea. Kyohak, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsolving AD, Bain MB (1993) Fish assemblage recovery along a riverine disturbance gradient. Ecol Appl 3:531–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemly AD, Kingsford RT, Thompson JR (2000) Irrigated agriculture and wildlife conservation: conflict on a global scale. Environ Manage 25:485–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luecke C, Wurtsbaugh WA (1993) Effects of moonlight and daylight on hydroacoustic estimates of pelagic fish abundance. Trans Am Fish Soc 122:112–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makrakis MC, Miranda LE, Makrakis S, Xavier AMM, Fontes HM, Morlis WG (2007) Migratory movements of pacu, Piaractus mesopotamicus, in the highly impounded Paraná River. J Appl Ichthyol 23:700–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez PJ, Chart TE, Trammell MA, Wullschleger JG, Bergersen EP (1994) Fish species composition before and after construction of a main stem reservoir on the White River, Colorado. Environ Biol Fish 40:227–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters JEG, Jang MH, Ha K, Bird PD, Frear PA, Lucas MC (2006) The commercial exploitation of a protected anadromous species, the river lamprey (Lampetra fluviatilis (L.)), in the tidal River Ouse, north-east England. Aquat Conserv 16:77–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowall RM (1988) Diadromy in fishes: migrations between freshwater and marine environments. Croom-Helm, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehner T (2006) Individual variability of diel vertical migrations in European vendace (Coregonus albula) explored by stationary vertical hydroacoustics. Ecol Freshw Fish 15:146–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehner T, Kasprzak P, Hölker F (2007) Exploring ultimate hypotheses to predict diel vertical migratons in coregnid fish. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 64:874–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicola GG, Elvira B, Almodovar A (1996) Dams and fish passage facilities in the large rivers of Spain: effects on migratory species. Arch Hydrobiol 113:375–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordeng H (1977) A pheromone hypothesis for homeward migration in anadromous salmonids. Oikos 28:155–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ovidio M, Baras E, Goffaux D, Birtles C, Philippart JC (1998) Environmental unpredictability rules the autumn migration of brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) in the Belgian Ardennes. Hydrobiologia 371(372):263–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park YS, Chang J, Lek S, Cao W, Brosse S (2003) Conservation strategies for endemic fish species threatened by the Three Gorges Dam. Conserv Biol 17:1748–1758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penczak T, Kruk A (2000) Threatened obligatory riverine fishes in human-modified Polish rivers. Ecol Freshw Fish 9:109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn JW, Kwak TJ (2003) Fish assemblage changes in an Ozark River after impoundment: a long-term perspective. Trans Am Fish Soc 132:110–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi A, Rasmussen JB (1999) Extinction rates of North American freshwater fauna. Conserv Biol 13:1220–1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe DW, Hinch SG (2010) Effectiveness monitoring of fish passage facilities: historical trends, geographic patterns and future directions. Fish Fish 11:12–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala OE, Chapin FSIII, Armesto JJ, Berlow R, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge D, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, Poff NL, Sykes MT, Walker BH, Walker M, Wall DH (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Santucci VJ, Jr Santucci, Gephard SR, Pescitelli SM (2005) Effects of multiple low-head dams on fish, macroinvertebrates, habitat, and water quality in the Fox River, Illinois. N Am J Fish Manage 25:975–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheuerell MD, Schindler DE (2003) Diel vertical migration by juvenile sockeye salmon: empirical evidence for the antipredation window. Ecology 84:1713–1720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilt CR (2007) Developing fish passage and protection at hydropower dams. Appl Anim Behav Sci 104:295–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon DJ (1978) Migration of smolts of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) and sea trout (Salmo trutta L.) in a chalkstream. Environ Biol Fish 3:223–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas DHL (1996) Dam construction and ecological change in the riparian forest of the Hadejia-Jama’are floodplain, Nigeria. Land Degrad Dev 7:279–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the CAER (Center for Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration) of Eco-STAR project from MOE (Ministry of Environment, Republic of Korea).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min-Ho Jang.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Thomas Mehner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yoon, JD., Kim, JH., Joo, GJ. et al. Post-passage movement of the fluvial fish Zacco temminckii following upstream transportation by a fishway operation in dam. Aquat Ecol 46, 421–430 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-012-9411-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-012-9411-2

Keywords

Navigation