Skip to main content
Log in

3D Printed Modeling of the Mitral Valve for Catheter-Based Structural Interventions

  • The Pursuit of Engineering the Ideal Heart Valve Replacement or Repair
  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 13 July 2016

Abstract

As catheter-based structural heart interventions become increasingly complex, the ability to effectively model patient-specific valve geometry as well as the potential interaction of an implanted device within that geometry will become increasingly important. Our aim with this investigation was to combine the technologies of high-spatial resolution cardiac imaging, image processing software, and fused multi-material 3D printing, to demonstrate that patient-specific models of the mitral valve apparatus could be created to facilitate functional evaluation of novel trans-catheter mitral valve repair strategies. Clinical 3D transesophageal echocardiography and computed tomography images were acquired for three patients being evaluated for a catheter-based mitral valve repair. Target anatomies were identified, segmented and reconstructed into 3D patient-specific digital models. For each patient, the mitral valve apparatus was digitally reconstructed from a single or fused imaging data set. Using multi-material 3D printing methods, patient-specific anatomic replicas of the mitral valve were created. 3D print materials were selected based on the mechanical testing of elastomeric TangoPlus materials (Stratasys, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, USA) and were compared to freshly harvested porcine leaflet tissue. The effective bending modulus of healthy porcine MV tissue was significantly less than the bending modulus of TangoPlus (p < 0.01). All TangoPlus varieties were less stiff than the maximum tensile elastic modulus of mitral valve tissue (3697.2 ± 385.8 kPa anterior leaflet; 2582.1 ± 374.2 kPa posterior leaflet) (p < 0.01). However, the slopes of the stress-strain toe regions of the mitral valve tissues (532.8 ± 281.9 kPa anterior leaflet; 389.0 ± 156.9 kPa posterior leaflet) were not different than those of the Shore 27, Shore 35, and Shore 27 with Shore 35 blend TangoPlus material (p > 0.95). We have demonstrated that patient-specific mitral valve models can be reconstructed from multi-modality imaging datasets and fabricated using the multi-material 3D printing technology and we provide two examples to show how catheter-based repair devices could be evaluated within specific patient 3D printed valve geometry. However, we recognize that the use of 3D printed models for the development of new therapies, or for specific procedural training has yet to be defined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CT:

Computed tomography

DICOM:

Digital imaging and communication in medicine

IPS:

Image processing software

LA:

Left atrium

LV:

Left ventricle

MR:

Mitral regurgitation

MV:

Mitral valve

3D TEE:

Three-dimensional transesophageal Echocardiography

TMVR:

Trans-catheter mitral valve replacement

References

  1. Durst, C. A., M. P. Cuchiara, E. G. Mansfield, J. L. West, and K. J. Grande-Allen. Flexural characterization of cell encapsulated PEGDA hydrogels with applications for tissue engineered heart valves. Acta Biomater. 7(6):2467–2476, 2011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Farooqi, K. M., and P. P. Sengupta. Echocardiography and three-dimensional printing: sound ideas to touch a heart. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 28(4):398–403, 2015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goswami, R., C. Barker, N. Kleiman, M. Jackson, and S. H. Little. Transesophageal echocardiography-guided percutaneous intervention of a mitral valve leaflet perforation. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 8(5):754–755, 2015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kheradvar, A., E. M. Groves, G. A. Simmons, B. Griffith, S. H. Alavi, R. Tranquillo, L. P. Dasi, A. Falahatpisheh, K. J. Grande-Allen, C. J. Goergen, M. R. K. Mofrad, F. Baajijens, S. Canic, and S. H. Little. Emerging trends in heart valve engineering: part III. Novel technologies for mitral valve repair and replacement. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 43(4):858–870, 2015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Little, S. H., M. Vukicevic, E. Avenatti, M. Ramchandani, and C. Barker. 3D Printed Modeling for Patient-specific mitral valve intervention: repair with a clip and a plug. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 9(9):973–975, 2016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mahmood, F., K. Owais, C. Taylor, M. Montealegre-Gallegos, W. Manning, R. Matyal, and K. R. Khabbaz. Three dimensional printing of mitral valve using echocardiographic data. JACC 8(2):226–231, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Maragiannis, D., M. S. Jackson, S. R. Igo, S. M. Chang, W. A. Zoghbi, and S. H. Little. Functional 3d printed patient-specific modeling of severe aortic stenosis. JACC 64(10):1066–1068, 2014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maragiannis, D., Jackson, MS, S. R. Igo, R. C. Schutt, P. Connell, J. Grande-Allen, et al. Replicating patient-specific severe aortic valve stenosis with functional 3D modeling. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 8(10):e003626, 2015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Merryman, W. D., H.-Y. S. Huang, F. J. Schoen, and M. S. Sacks. The effects of cellular contraction on aortic valve leaflet flexural stiffness. J. Biomech. 39(1):88–96, 2006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nkomo, V. T., J. M. Gardin, T. N. Skelton, J. S. Gottdiener, C. G. Scott, and M. Enriquez-Sarano. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet 368:1005–1011, 2006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Olivieri, L. J., A. Krieger, Y. H. Loke, D. S. Nath, P. C. Kim, and C. A. Sable. Three-dimensional printing of intracardiac defects from three-dimensional echocardiographic images: feasibility and relative accuracy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 28(4):392–397, 2015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Richards, J. M., E. J. Farrar, B. G. Kornreich, N. S. Moıse, and J. T. Butcher. The mechanobiology of mitral valve function, degeneration, and repair. J. Vet. Cardiol. 14:47e58, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Witschey, W. R. T., A. M. Pouch, J. R. McGarvey, K. Ikeuchi, F. Contijoch, M. M. Levack, P. A. Yushkevich, C. M. Sehgal, B. M. Jackson, R. C. Gorman, and J. H. Gorman. Three-dimensional ultrasound-derived physical mitral valve modeling. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 98:691–694, 2014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen H. Little.

Additional information

Associate Editor Lakshmi Prasad Dasi oversaw the review of this article.

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1690-7.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vukicevic, M., Puperi, D.S., Jane Grande-Allen, K. et al. 3D Printed Modeling of the Mitral Valve for Catheter-Based Structural Interventions. Ann Biomed Eng 45, 508–519 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1676-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1676-5

Keywords

Navigation