Abstract
We present a hydrodynamically controlled, single-cell-rotation method to demonstrate electroporation-mediated molecular delivery in a microfluidic channel. Using a two-inlet geometry to control the carrier-flow profile, cell flow path and angular velocities can be controlled. When the flow-rate ratio between the fluid sheath and cell streams is balanced, fluidic shear occurs near the walls of the channel due to differential flow velocities between the streamlines. Single-cell angular velocities can then be explicitly controlled by using higher flow-rate ratios between the streams. Using sheathing streams with sufficiently high flow-rate ratios between the sheath and sample streams, cells are pinched against the sidewalls of the channel, which results in large degrees of cell rotation. We applied this technique to single-cell electroporation to increase the delivery of small molecules into the cell. Cell orientation was controlled along the length of the microchannel to continuously expose new cell membrane surface area to an applied electric field. Thus, the cell membrane becomes circumferentially permeabilized, resulting in a more efficient and uniform transport of micro- and macromolecules into rotating cells compared to the non-rotating one. Hydrodynamic control of cell rotation offers a new means to enhance intracellular delivery efficiency in single-cell electroporation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson H, van den Berg A (2003) Microfluidic devices for cellomics: a review. Sens Actuators B Chem 92:315–325. doi:10.1016/S0925-4005(03)00266-1
Bretherton FP (1962) The motion of rigid particles in a shear flow at low Reynolds number. J Fluid Mech 14:284–304
Chiu DT (2007) Cellular manipulations in microvortices. Anal Bioanal Chem 387:17–20. doi:10.1007/s00216-006-0611-2
Demiryurek Y, Nickaeen M, Zheng M et al (2015) Transport, resealing, and re-poration dynamics of two-pulse electroporation-mediated molecular delivery. Biochim Biophys Acta—Biomembr 1848:1706–1714
Di Carlo D, Irimia D, Tompkins RG, Toner M (2007) Continuous inertial focusing, ordering, and separation of particles in microchannels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:18892–18897. doi:10.1073/pnas.0704958104
Dittrich PS, Manz A (2006) Lab-on-a-chip: microfluidics in drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 5:210–218. doi:10.1038/nrd1985
Fahraeus R, Lindqvist T (1931) The viscosity of the blood in narrow capillary tubes. Am J Physiol 8:562–568
Gehl J (2003) Electroporation: theory and methods, perspectives for drug delivery, gene therapy and research. Acta Physiol Scand 177:437–447. doi:10.1046/j.1365-201X.2003.01093.x
Goldman AJ, Cox RG, Brenner H (1967) Slow viscous motion of a sphere parallel to a plane wall—I Motion through a quiescent fluid. Chem Eng Sci 22:637–651. doi:10.1016/0009-2509(67)80047-2
Golzio M, Teissie J, Rols M-P (2002) Direct visualization at the single-cell level of electrically mediated gene delivery. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:1292–1297. doi:10.1073/pnas.022646499
Hur SC, Henderson-MacLennan NK, McCabe ERB, Di Carlo D (2011) Deformability-based cell classification and enrichment using inertial microfluidics. Lab Chip 11:912–920. doi:10.1039/c0lc00595a
Jeffery GB (1922) The motion of ellipsoidal particles immersed in a viscous fluid. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 102:161–179. doi:10.1098/rspa.1922.0078
Jons TB (2003) Basic theory of dielectrophoresis and electroporation. IEEE Eng Med Biol 22:33–42. doi:10.1109/MEMB.2003.1304999
Khine M, Lau A, Ionescu-Zanetti C et al (2005) A single cell electroporation chip. Lab Chip 5:38–43. doi:10.1039/b408352k
Khine M, Ionescu-Zanetti C, Blatz A et al (2007) Single-cell electroporation arrays with real-time monitoring and feedback control. Lab Chip 7:457–462. doi:10.1039/b614356c
Kim TK, Eberwine JH (2010) Mammalian cell transfection: the present and the future. Anal Bioanal Chem 397:3173–3178. doi:10.1007/s00216-010-3821-6
Kim JA, Cho K, Shin YS et al (2007) A multi-channel electroporation microchip for gene transfection in mammalian cells. Biosens Bioelectron 22:3273–3277. doi:10.1016/j.bios.2007.02.009
Kim JA, Cho K, Shin MS et al (2008) A novel electroporation method using a capillary and wire-type electrode. Biosens Bioelectron 23:1353–1360. doi:10.1016/j.bios.2007.12.009
Leal LG, Hinch EJ (1971) The effect of weak Brownian rotations on particles in shear flow. J Fluid Mech 46:685. doi:10.1017/S0022112071000788
Lee WG, Bang H, Yun H et al (2008) An impulsive, electropulsation-driven backflow in microchannels during electroporation. Lab Chip 8:224–226. doi:10.1039/b714371k
Li J, Lin H (2011) Numerical simulation of molecular uptake via electroporation. Bioelectrochemistry 82:10–21. doi:10.1016/j.bioelechem.2011.04.006
Li J, Tan W, Yu M, Lin H (2013) The effect of extracellular conductivity on electroporation-mediated molecular delivery. Biochim Biophys Acta—Biomembr 1828:461–470. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2012.08.014
Liu Q, Prosperetti A (2010) Wall effects on a rotating sphere. J Fluid Mech 657:1–21. doi:10.1017/S002211201000128X
Mir LM (2000) Therapeutic perspectives of in vivo cell electropermeabilization. Bioelectrochemistry 53:1–10. doi:10.1016/S0302-4598(00)00112-4
Morales MC, Lin H, Zahn JD (2012) Continuous microfluidic DNA and protein trapping and concentration by balancing transverse electrokinetic forces. Lab Chip 12:99–108. doi:10.1039/c1lc20605b
Pamme N (2007) Continuous flow separations in microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 7:1644. doi:10.1039/b712784g
Sadik MM, Li J, Shan JW et al (2013a) Quantification of propidium iodide delivery using millisecond electric pulses: experiments. Biochim Biophys Acta 1828:1322–1328. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.01.002
Sadik MM, Li J, Shan JW et al (2013b) Quantification of propidium iodide delivery using millisecond electric pulses: experiments. Biochim Biophys Acta—Biomembr 1828:1322–1328. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.01.002
Schnelle T, Müller T, Reichle C, Fuhr G (2000) Combined dielectrophoretic field cages and laser tweezers for electrorotation. Appl Phys B Lasers Opt 70:267–274. doi:10.1007/s003400050044
Shelby JP, Chiu DT (2004) Controlled rotation of biological micro- and nano-particles in microvortices. Lab Chip 4:168–170. doi:10.1039/b402479f
Shrewsbury PJ, Muller SJ, Liepmann D (2001) Effect of flow on complex biological macromolecules in microfluidic devices. Biomed Microdevices 3:225–238. doi:10.1023/A:1011415414667
Takagi J, Yamada M, Yasuda M, Seki M (2005) Continuous particle separation in a microchannel having asymmetrically arranged multiple branches. Lab Chip 5:778–784. doi:10.1039/b501885d
Vahidkhah K, Diamond SL, Bagchi P (2014) Platelet dynamics in three-dimensional simulation of whole blood. Biophys J 106:2529–2540. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2014.04.028
White F (1974) Viscous fluid flow, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 413
Yamada M, Nakashima M, Seki M (2004) Pinched flow fractionation: continuous size separation of particles utilizing a laminar flow profile in a pinched microchannel. Anal Chem 76:5465–5471. doi:10.1021/ac049863r
Yun H, Kim K, Lee WG (2013) Cell manipulation in microfluidics. Biofabrication 5:022001. doi:10.1088/1758-5082/5/2/022001
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge financial support by the National Science Foundation (NSF CBET 0967598, DBI IDBR 1353918)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zheng, M., Shan, J.W., Lin, H. et al. Hydrodynamically controlled cell rotation in an electroporation microchip to circumferentially deliver molecules into single cells. Microfluid Nanofluid 20, 16 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-015-1691-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-015-1691-0