Abstract
Visualizing the natural behavior of motile cells over many hours is a challenge, as cells can leave the field of view of a microscope in a matter of minutes. Many interesting cell behaviors—such as cell division, motility phenotype, cell–cell interactions, and multicellular colony formation—require hours of observation to characterize. We present a microfluidic device that traps hundreds of single motile cells in isolated chambers, thereby allowing observation over several days. This polydimethylsiloxane device features 400 circular chambers, connected to a central serpentine channel. Motile cells are loaded into these chambers through the serpentine channel. The channel is then purged with air, fluidically isolating the chambers from each other and effectively trapping the cells. We applied the device to observe the behavior of the choanoflagellate Salpingoeca rosetta. Because of its ability to live in both solitary and colonial forms, S. rosetta is a useful model organism for the study of the evolutionary origins of multicellularity. In particular, S. rosetta can take on two distinct colonial forms: chain colonies and rosette colonies. With our device, we are able to observe the formation of these colonies from single cells more easily and with higher throughput than ever before. This device has the potential to be a powerful tool for studying the long-term behavior of motile cells.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alegado RA, Brown LW, Cao S, Dermenjian RK, Zuzow R, Fairclough SR, Clardy J, King N (2012) A bacterial sulfonolipid triggers multicellular development in the closest living relatives of animals. eLife. doi:10.7554/eLife.00013
Balaban NQ (2005) Szilard’s dream. Nat Methods 2:648–649. doi:10.1038/nmeth0905-648
Breslauer DN, Lee PJ, Lee LP (2006) Microfluidics-based systems biology. Mol BioSyst 2:97–112. doi:10.1039/b515632g
Cira NJ, Ho JY, Dueck ME, Weibel DB (2012) A self-loading microfluidic device for determining the minimum inhibitory concentration of antibiotics. Lab Chip 12:1052–1059. doi:10.1039/c2lc20887c
Di Carlo D, Lee LP (2006) Dynamic single-cell analysis for quantitative biology. Anal Chem 78:7918–7925. doi:10.1021/ac069490p
Di Carlo D, Wu LY, Lee LP (2006) Dynamic single cell culture array. Lab Chip 6:1445–1449. doi:10.1039/B605937F
Dimov IK, Basabe-Desmonts L, Garcia-Cordero JL, Ross BM, Ricco AJ, Lee LP (2011) Stand-alone self-powered integrated microfluidic blood analysis system (SIMBAS). Lab Chip 11:845–850. doi:10.1039/c0lc00403k
EPA (1999) Risk management program guidance for offsite consequence analysis. U.S. EPA. EPA-550-B-99-009. http://daq.state.nc.us/toxics/risk/112r/files/guid_oca-all(31).pdf. Accessed 1 Nov 2012
Fairclough SR, Dayel MJ, King N (2010) Multicellular development in a choanoflagellate. Curr Biol 20:R875–R876. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.09.014
Friedman M, Lindstrom S, Ekerljung L, Andersson-Svahn H, Carlsson J, Brismar H, Gedda L, Frejd FY, Stahl S (2009) Engineering and characterization of a bispecific HER2 × EGFR-binding affibody molecule. Biotech Appl Biochem 54:121–131. doi:10.1042/BA20090096
Fu AY, Chou H, Spence C, Arnold FH, Quake SR (2002) An integrated microfabricated cell sorter. Anal Chem 74:2451–2457. doi:10.1021/ac0255330
Groisman A, Lobo C, Cho H, Campbell JK, Dufour YS, Stevens AM, Levchenko A (2005) A microfluidic chemostat for experiments with bacterial and yeast cells. Nat Methods 2:685–689. doi:10.1038/NMETH784
Ingham CJ, Vlieg JETVH (2008) MEMS and the microbe. Lab Chip 8:1604–1616. doi:10.1039/b804790a
Kim SM, Lee SH, Suh KY (2008) Cell research with physically modified microfluidic channels: a review. Lab Chip 8:1015–1023. doi:10.1039/b800835c
King N (2004) The unicellular ancestry of animal development. Dev Cell 7:313–325. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2004.08.010
King N (2005) Choanoflagellates. Curr Biol 15:R113–R114. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.02.004
Kumano I, Hosoda K, Suzuki H, Hirata K, Yomo T (2012) Hydrodynamic trapping of Tetrahymena thermophila for the long-term monitoring of cell behaviors. Lab Chip 12:3451–3457. doi:10.1039/c2lc40367f
Lang BF, O’Kelly C, Nerad T, Gray MW, Burger G (2002) The closest unicellular relatives of animals. Curr Biol 12:1773–1778. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01187-9
Lindstrom S, Andersson-Svahn H (2010) Overview of single-cell analyses: microdevices and applications. Lab Chip 10:3363–3372. doi:10.1039/c0lc00150c
Lindstrom S, Andersson-Svahn H (2011) Miniaturization of biological assays—overview on microwell devices for single-cell analyses. Biochim Biophys Acta 1810:308–316. doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2010.04.009
Lindstrom S, Eriksson M, Vazin T, Sandberg J, Lundeberg J, Frisen J, Andersson-Svahn H (2009a) High-density microwell chip for culture and analysis of stem cells. PLoS ONE 4:e6997. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006997
Lindstrom S, Hammond M, Brismar H, Andersson-Svahn H, Ahmadian A (2009b) PCR amplification and genetic analysis in a microwell cell culturing chip. Lab Chip 9:3465–3471. doi:10.1039/B912596E
Liu W, Dechev N, Foulds IG, Burke R, Parameswaran A, Park EJ (2009) A novel permalloy based magnetic single cell micro array. Lab Chip 9:2381–2390. doi:10.1039/b821044f
Luo C, Zhu X, Yu T, Luo X, Ouyang Q, Ji H, Chen Y (2008) A fast cell loading and high throughput microfluidic system for long-term cell culture in zero flow environments. Biotechnol Bioeng 101(1):190–195. doi:10.1002/bit.21877
Lutz BR, Chen J, Schwartz DT (2006) Hydrodynamic tweezers: 1. Noncontact trapping of single cells using steady streaming microeddies. Anal Chem 78:5429–5435. doi:10.1021/ac060555y
Mao H, Cremer PS, Manson MD (2003) A sensitive, versatile microfluidic assay for bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:5449–5454. doi:10.1073/pnas.0931258100
Muralimohan A, Eun YJ, Bhattacharyya B, Weibel DB (2009) Dissecting microbiological systems using materials science. Trends Microbiol 17:100–108. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2008.11.007
Nilsson J, Evander M, Hammarstrom B, Laurell T (2009) Review of cell and particle trapping in microfluidic systems. Anal Chim Acta 649:141–157. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2009.07.017
Novick A, Szilard L (1950) Description of the chemostat. Science 112:715–716
Regehr KJ, Domenech M, Koepsel JT, Carver KC, Ellison-Zelski SJ, Murphy WL, Schuler LA, Alarid ET, Beebe DJ (2009) Biological implications of polydimethylsiloxane-based microfluidic cell culture. Lab Chip 9:2132–2139. doi:10.1039/B903043C
Umehara S, Wakamoto Y, Inoue I, Yasuda K (2003) On-chip single-cell microcultivation assay for monitoring environmental effects on isolated cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 305:534–540. doi:10.1016/S0006291X(03)00794-0
Wain AR (2011) Patterns of growth and culturing protocols for Salpingoeca rosetta to be used in investigations of the origin of animal multicellularity. University of Akron (Master’s thesis)
Weibel DB, Diluzio WR, Whitesides GM (2007) Microfabrication meets microbiology. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:209–218. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1616
Xia Y, Rogers JA, Paul KE, Whitesides GM (1999) Unconventional methods for fabricating and patterning nanostructures. Chem Rev Columb 99:1823–1848. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.05.064
Zheng S, Lin H, Liu J, Balic M, Datar R, Cote RJ, Tai Y (2007) Membrane microfilter device for selective capture, electrolysis and genomic analysis of human circulating tumor cells. J Chromatogr A 1162:154–161. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.05.064
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Nicole King, Terry Johnson, Arielle Woznica, and Tera Levin for their mentorship and guidance. We would also like to thank the King laboratory for graciously providing the S. rosetta cells. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation’s Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) program under Grant No. 0852058.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Shakked O. Halperin and Chelsey T. Poling have contributed equally.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
10404_2014_1372_MOESM5_ESM.avi
Video 5: Time-lapse sequence of a chamber seeded with a single Choanoflagellate which proliferates, forms a chain colony, and disaggregates (68 h, with each frame = 1 h) (AVI 1,410 kb)
Appendix: Media retention equations
Appendix: Media retention equations
1.1 US EPA method
E evaporation rate (kg/min), u wind speed just above the pool liquid surface (m/s), M pool liquid molecular weight, A surface area of the pool liquid (m2), P pool liquid vapor pressure at the pool temperature (kPa), T pool liquid absolute temperature (K).
1.2 Retention bridge evaporation time
t time for media in bridge to evaporate (min), t evac time syringe pump set to Q evac (min), l B bridge length (m), T media absolute temperature (K), w s serpentine width (m), h channel height (m), P vapor pressure of media at T (kPa), M media solvent molecular weight, QS study flow rate (mL/h), Q evac serpentine evacuation flow rate (mL/h).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Halperin, S.O., Poling, C.T., Mathrani, S.R. et al. A massively parallel microfluidic device for long-term visualization of isolated motile cells. Microfluid Nanofluid 17, 821–829 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-014-1372-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-014-1372-4