Skip to main content
Log in

Amplitude and phase estimator combined with the Wiener postfilter for medical ultrasound imaging

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The adaptive amplitude and phase estimator (APES) has been introduced in medical ultrasound imaging to calculate the amplitude of the desired signal more robustly than other adaptive beamformers like minimum variance (MV). This beamformer minimizes the optimization problem of MV by replacing the estimated array covariance matrix by the interferences plus noise covariance matrix. On the other hand, the Wiener postfilter as a post-weighting factor, which will be multiplied to the final weight vector of the beamformer, estimates the power of the desired signal and the power of the interferences plus noise to improve the contrast.

Method

The proposed method is a combination of the APES beamformer with the Wiener postfilter which uses the capabilities of the APES beamformer for accurate estimation of the amplitude of the desired signal and the Wiener postfilter in suppressing sidelobes. Specifically, we used the interferences plus the noise covariance matrix estimated in the APES beamformer to obtain an APES-based Wiener postfilter and obtained the APES + Wiener weight vector by multiplying the APES-based Wiener postfilter to the standard APES weight vector.

Results

To evaluate the proposed APES + Wiener beamformer, we tested the proposed method on simulated and experimental datasets. The results of a simulated wire phantom demonstrate that the proposed beamformer can resolve two point scatterers better than the standard APES beamformer, even if the points are placed near each other. Simulating a cyst phantom shows that the APES + Wiener beamformer improves the contrast of the resulting images by about 4.5 dB by estimating the interior of the cyst better than the standard APES.

Conclusion

The evaluation of the proposed beamformer on an experimental dataset confirms the results of simulations, in which the proposed beamformer improves the resolution and contrast in comparison with the standard APES beamformer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parker K. Apodization and windowing functions. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2013;60:1263–1271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mann JA, Walker WF. A constrained adaptive beamformer for medical ultrasound: initial results. Proceed IEEE Ultrason Symp. 2002;2:1807–1810.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sasso M, Cohen-Bacrie C. Medical ultrasound imaging using the fully adaptive beamformer. ICASSP IEEE Int Conf Acoust Speech Signal Process Proceed. 2005;2:II489–ll492.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Capon J. High-resolution frequency-wavenumber spectrum analysis. Proceed IEEE. 1969;57:1408–1418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Synnevag JF, Austeng A, Holm S. Adaptive beamforming applied to medical ultrasound imaging. Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control IEEE Trans. 2007;54:1606–1613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Synnevag JF, Austeng A, Holm S. Benefits of minimum-variance beamforming in medical ultrasound imaging. Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control IEEE Trans. 2009;56:1868–1879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Asl BM, Mahloojifar A. Eigenspace-based minimum variance beamforming applied to medical ultrasound imaging. Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control IEEE Trans. 2010;57:2381–2390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Asl BM, Mahloojifar A. Contrast enhancement and robustness improvement of adaptive ultrasound imaging using forward-backward minimum variance beamforming. Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control IEEE Trans. 2011;58:858–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Asl BM, Mahloojifar A. Minimum variance beamforming combined with adaptive coherence weighting applied to medical ultrasound imaging. Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control IEEE Trans. 2009;56:1923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li PC, Li M-L. Adaptive imaging using the generalized coherence factor. Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control IEEE Trans. 2003;50:128–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nilsen CC, Holm S. Wiener beamforming and the coherence factor in ultrasound imaging. Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control IEEE Trans. 2010;57:1329–1346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shan TJ, Kailath T. Adaptive Beamforming for coherent signals and interference. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process ASSP. 1985;33:527–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Takao K, Kikuma N. An adaptive array utilizing an adaptive spatial averaging technique for multipath environments. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag AP. 1987;35:1389–1396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Taki H, Taki K, Sakamoto T, Yamakawa M, Shiina T, Kudo M, Sato T. High range resolution ultrasonographic vascular imaging using frequency domain interferometry with the Capon method. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012;31:417–429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stoica P, Li H, Li J. A new derivation of the apes filter. Signal Process Lett IEEE. 1999;6:205–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Blomberg A, Austeng A, Hansen R. Adaptive beamforming applied to a cylindrical sonar array using an interpolated array transformation. Ocean Eng IEEE J. 2012;37:25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Trees HLV. Optimum array processing. USA: Wiley; 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Jensen J. Field: a program for simulating ultrasound systems. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1996;34:351–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wagner R, Smith S, Sandrik J, Lopez H. Statistics of speckle in ultrasound B-scans sonics and ultrasonics. IEEE Trans. 1983;30:156–163.

    Google Scholar 

  20. U.-M. Biomedical Ultrasonics Laboratory, North Campus. http://www.bme.umich.edu/labs/bul/newBULsite/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Babak Mohammadzadeh Asl.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest in this paper.

Ethical considerations

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deylami, A.M., Asl, B.M. Amplitude and phase estimator combined with the Wiener postfilter for medical ultrasound imaging. J Med Ultrasonics 43, 11–18 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-015-0671-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-015-0671-z

Keywords

Navigation