Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bevel toric multicurve rigid gas-permeable lens for keratoconus

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Twinbel bevel toric, a newly designed rigid gas-permeable (RGP) lens with a toric bevel curvature, for keratoconus.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of nine eyes of patients with keratoconus who had been wearing RGP contact lenses and were switched to Twinbel bevel toric at Yamaguchi University Hospital. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were measured under photopic conditions. Complaint symptoms were recorded as primary outcome measures at follow-up visits. Efficacy and safety were evaluated at 12 weeks after the switch to Twinbel bevel toric or later.

Results

Five eyes (55.6 %) showed an improvement in visual acuity with Twinbel bevel toric compared with the previous lens, whereas four eyes (44.4 %) maintained the same visual acuity as before. The mean best corrected visual acuity ± SD with Twinbel bevel toric was 0.01 ± 0.40 logMAR, significantly better (P = 0.044, paired Student’s t test) than that (0.23 ± 0.51 logMAR) with the previous lens. Contrast sensitivity and subjective complaint scores did not differ significantly between Twinbel bevel toric and the previous lens. No serious complications of Twinbel bevel toric wear were observed.

Conclusions

Fitting of Twinbel bevel toric improved visual acuity in eyes affected by keratoconus, thus providing a viable alternative for management of such eyes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krachmer JH, Feder RS, Belin MW. Keratoconus and related noninflammatory corneal thinning disorders. Surv Ophthalmol. 1984;28:293–322.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998;42:297–319.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim H, Joo CK. Measure of keratoconus progression using Orbscan II. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:600–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Haque S, Jones L, Simpson T. Thickness mapping of the cornea and epithelium using optical coherence tomography. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85:E963–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ye P, Tang K, Hofbauer J, Weissman BA. A case report of keratoconus with regular astigmatic topography. Eye Contact Lens. 2007;33:203–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nakagawa T, Maeda N, Kosaki R, Hori Y, Inoue T, Saika M, et al. Higher-order aberrations due to the posterior corneal surface in patients with keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:2660–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jinabhai A, Radhakrishnan H, O’Donnell C. Visual acuity and ocular aberrations with different rigid gas permeable lens fittings in keratoconus. Eye Contact Lens. 2010;36:233–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Betts AM, Mitchell GL, Zadnik K. Visual performance and comfort with the Rose K lens for keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2002;79:493–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jain AK, Sukhija J. Rose-K contact lens for keratoconus. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2007;55:121–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ozkurt YB, Sengor T, Kurna S, Evciman T, Acikgoz S, Haboğlu M, et al. Rose K contact lens fitting for keratoconus. Int Ophthalmol. 2008;28:395–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Szczotka-Flynn LB, Patel S. Menicon Z rigid gas permeable lenses for keratoconus and irregular corneas: a retrospective case series. Eye Contact Lens. 2008;34:254–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hu CY, Tung HC. Managing keratoconus with reverse-geometry and dual-geometry contact lenses: a case report. Eye Contact Lens. 2008;34:71–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Erdurmus M, Yildiz EH, Abdalla YF, Hammersmith KM, Rapuano CJ, Cohen EJ. Contact lens related quality of life in patients with keratoconus. Eye Contact Lens. 2009;35:123–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bilgin LK, Yilmaz S, Araz B, Yüksel SB, Sezen T. 30 years of contact lens prescribing for keratoconic patients in Turkey. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2009;32:16–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mandathara Sudharman P, Rathi V, Dumapati S. Rose K lenses for keratoconus—an Indian experience. Eye Contact Lens. 2010;36:220–2.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schornack MM, Patel SV. Scleral lenses in the management of keratoconus. Eye Contact Lens. 2010;36:39–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yanai R, Ueda K, Nishida T. Retrospective analysis of vision correction and lens tolerance in keratoconus patients prescribed a contact lens with dual aspherical curves. Eye Contact Lens. 2010;36:86–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kang YS, Park YK, Lee JS, Lee SU, Shin JH, Han YS, et al. The effect of the YK lens in keratoconus. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010;30:267–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Barnett M, Mannis MJ. Contact lenses in the management of keratoconus. Cornea. 2011;30:1510–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zadnik K, Steger-May K, Fink BA, Joslin CE, Nichols JJ, Rosenstiel CE, et al. Between-eye asymmetry in keratoconus. Cornea. 2002;21:671–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Oshida T, Fushimi N, Sakimoto T, Sawa M. Acute hydrops in a host cornea after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2011;55:418–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yanai R, Ishida Y, Ueda K, Nishida T. Use of multi-curved rigid contact lenses for irregular astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. J Jpn Contact Lens Soc. 2007;49:166–70.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Romero-Jimenez M, Santodomingo-Rubido J, Wolffsohn JS. Keratoconus: a review. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2010;33:157–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wilson SE, Lin DT, Klyce SD, Reidy JJ, Insler MS. Rigid contact lens decentration: a risk factor for corneal warpage. CLAO J. 1990;16:177–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Moon JW, Shin KC, Lee HJ, Wee WR, Lee JH, Kim MK. The effect of contact lens wear on the ocular surface changes in keratoconus. Eye Contact Lens. 2006;32:96–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Negishi K, Kumanomido T, Utsumi Y, Tsubota K. Effect of higher-order aberrations on visual function in keratoconic eyes with a rigid gas permeable contact lens. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144:924–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Marsack JD, Parker KE, Pesudovs K, Donnelly WJ 3rd, Applegate RA. Uncorrected wavefront error and visual performance during RGP wear in keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84:463–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wei RH, Khor WB, Lim L, Tan DT. Contact lens characteristics and contrast sensitivity of patients with keratoconus. Eye Contact Lens. 2011;37:307–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chan CC, Wachler BS. Reduced best spectacle-corrected visual acuity from inserting a thicker Intacs above and thinner Intacs below in keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2007;23:93–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Thebpatiphat N, Hammersmith KM, Rapuano CJ, Ayres BD, Cohen EJ. Cataract surgery in keratoconus. Eye Contact Lens. 2007;33:244–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tomalla M, Cagnolati W. Modern treatment options for the therapy of keratoconus. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2007;30:61–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Shetty R, Kurian M, Anand D, Mhaske P, Narayana KM, Shetty BK. Intacs in advanced keratoconus. Cornea. 2008;27:1022–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Elsahn AF, Rapuano CJ, Antunes VA, Abdalla YF, Cohen EJ. Excimer laser phototherapeutic keratectomy for keratoconus nodules. Cornea. 2009;28:144–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Abdalla YF, Elsahn AF, Hammersmith KM, Cohen EJ. SynergEyes lenses for keratoconus. Cornea. 2010;29:5–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Espandar L, Meyer J. Keratoconus: overview and update on treatment. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2010;17:15–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Pesando PM, Ghiringhello MP, Di Meglio G, Romeo S. Treatment of keratoconus with Ferrara ICRS and consideration of the efficacy of the Ferrara nomogram in a 5-year follow-up. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2010;20:865–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yu JO, Gundel RE. Use of Acular LS in the pain management of keratoconus: a pilot study. Optom Vis Sci. 2010;87:125–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Izquierdo L Jr, Henriquez MA, McCarthy M. Artiflex phakic intraocular lens implantation after corneal collagen cross-linking in keratoconic eyes. J Refract Surg. 2011;27:482–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kang SY, Park YK, Song JS, Kim HM. Anterior stromal puncture for treatment of contact lens-intolerant keratoconus patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249:89–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sedaghat M, Ansari-Astaneh MR, Zarei-Ghanavati M, Davis SW, Sikder S. Artisan iris-supported phakic IOL implantation in patients with keratoconus: a review of 16 eyes. J Refract Surg. 2011;27:489–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Yildiz EH, Diehl GF, Cohen EJ, Hammersmith KM, Laibson PR, Rapuano CJ. Demographics of patients older than 50 years with keratoconus. Eye Contact Lens. 2009;35:309–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from the Japanese Eye Bank Association (to R.Y.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryoji Yanai.

About this article

Cite this article

Yanai, R., Ueda, K. & Sonoda, KH. Bevel toric multicurve rigid gas-permeable lens for keratoconus. Jpn J Ophthalmol 57, 199–205 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-012-0216-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-012-0216-6

Keywords

Navigation