Zusammenfassung
Die endovenösen Behandlungsverfahren zur Therapie der Stammvenenvarikose sind in den letzten 15 Jahren weltweit akzeptiert worden. Die Effektivität der verschiedenen endovenösen Methoden und die minimalen Nebenwirkungsraten sind inzwischen durch eine große Zahl von Evidenz basierten Publikationen belegt worden. Die endovenöse thermische Ablation (ETA) mit Radiofrequenz oder Laser wird deswegen 2013 in den neuen NICE Guidelines (UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) für die Behandlung der varikösen Venen als erste Wahl bei einer Stammvarikose empfohlen, gefolgt von der Ultraschall kontrollierten Schaumverödung und erst als dritte Wahl wird das klassische Stripping mit Crossektomie genannt.
Summary
In the past 15 years, the minimally invasive endovenous treatments of varicose veins have been widely accepted. The efficacy of the different endovenous methods and the minimal post operative side effects are meanwhile well documented in a large number of evidence based publications. The recent NICE Guidelines (2013) considering the varicose vein treatment recommend in case of an insufficiency of saphenous veins first the endovenous thermal ablation with radiofrequency or laser, then the ultrasound guided sclerotherapy and as the third line the classic surgical treatment with stripping and high ligation.
Literatur
Jones L, Braithwaite BD, Selwyn D, et al. Neovascularisation is the principal cause of varicose vein recurrence: results of a randomised trial of stripping the long saphenous vein. Eur J Vasc Endivasc Surg. 1996;12:442–5.
Chandler JG, Pichot O, Sessa C, et al. Treatment of Primary Venous Insufficiency by Endovenous Saphenous Vein Obliteration. Vasc Surg. 2000;34:201–14.
Shaidakov EV, Grigoryan AG, Ilyukhin EA, et al. Morphological changes in the vein after different numbers of radiofrequency ablation cycles. J Vacs Surg: Venous and Lym Dis. 2014; 2:113–4 (abstract).
Schuller-Petrovic S, Pavlovic MD, Schuller-Lukic B, et al. Retrospective analysis of routine use of a double heat cycle (DHC) during radiofrequency segmental ablation (ClosureFast TM) of saphenous veins. J Eur Acad Dermatol Veneorol. 2016;30(6):1009–12.
Creton D, Pichot O, Sessa C, et al. Radiofrequency-powered segmental thermal obliteration carried out with the ClosureFast prosedure: results at 1 year. Ann Vasc Surg. 2010;24:350–6.
Proebstle TM, Alm J, Göckeritz O, et al. Three-year European follow-up of endovenous radiofrequency-powered segmental thermal ablation of the great saphenous vein with or without treatment of calf varicosities. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:146–52.
Anwar MA, Lane TRA, Davies AH, et al. Complications of radiofrequency ablation of varicose veins. Phlebology. 2012;27((Suppl 1):34–9.
Gandhi A, Froghi F, Shepherd AC, et al. A study of patient satisfaction following endothermal ablation for varicose veins. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2010;44:274–8.
Lurie F, Creton D, Eklof B, et al. Prospective randomized study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure procedure) versus ligation and stripping in a selected patient population (EVOLVeS Study). J Vasc Surg. 2003;38(2):207–14.
Rhee SJ, Cantelmo NL, Conrad MF, et al. Factors infuencing the incidence of endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT). Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2013;47:207–12.
Testmann JP, Thierbach H, Dietrich A, et al. Radiofrequency induced thermotherapy (RFITT) of varicose veins compared to endovenous laser treatment (EVLT): a non-randomized prospective study concerning on occlusion rates, side effects and clinical outcome. Eur J Dermatol. 2011;21:945–51.
Van Ruijven PW, Poluektova AA, Gemert MJ van, et al. Optical-thermal mathematical model for endovenous laser ablation of varicose veins. Lasers Med Sci. 2014;29(2):431–9.
Bos RR van den, Ruijven PW van, Geld CW van der, et al. Endovenous simulated laser experiments at 940 nm and 1470 nm suggest wavelength-independent temperature profiles. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;44(1):77–81.
Disselhoff B, Rem AI, Verdaasdonk R, et al. Endovenous laser ablation: an experimental study on mechanism of action. Phlebology. 2008;23:69–76.
Bush RG, Shamma HN, Hammond K. Histological changes occuring after endoluminal ablation with two diode lasers (940 and 1319 nm) from acute changes to 4 months. Lasers Surg Med. 2008;40:679–679.
Theivacumar NS, Dellagrammaticas D, Beale RJ, et al. Factors influencing the effectiveness of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) in the treatment of great saphenous vein reflux. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;35:119–23.
Hernandez OE, Mordon SR, Marqa MF, et al. A comparative study of the efficacy of endovenous laser treatment of the incompetent great saphenous vein under general anesthesia with external air cooling with and without tumescent anesthesia. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39:255–62.
Schuller-Petrovic S, Schuller S, Schuller-Lukic B, et al. Side effects and occlusion rate after tumescentless treatment of the great saphenous vein with EVLA. Phlebologie. 2015;44:63–5.
Vuylsteke ME, Thomis S, Mahieu P, et al. Endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein using a bare fibre versus a tulip fibre: a randomised clinical trial. Eur J Endovasc Surg. 2012;44:587–92.
Thomis S, Verbrugghe P, Milleret R, et al. Steam ablation versus radiofrequency and laser ablation: an in vivo histological comparative trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013;46:378–82.
Milleret R, Huot L, Nicolini P, et al. Great saphenous vein ablation with steam injection: results of a multicentre study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013;45:391–6.
Min RJ, Almeida JI, McLeanDJ, et al. Novel vein closure procedure using a proprietary cyanoacrylate adhesive: 30-day swine model results. Phlebology. 2012;27:398–403.
Morrison N, Gibson K, McEnroe S, et al. Randomized trial comparing cyanoacrylate embolization and radiofrequency ablation for incompetent great saphenous veins (VeClose). J Vac Surg. 2015;61(4):985–94.
Varicose veins in the legs. The diagnosis and management of varicose veins. NICE clinical guideline 168. Issued July 2013. Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/14226/64566/64566.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
S. Schuller-Petrovic gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schuller-Petrovic, S. Endovenöse Ablation der Stammvenenvarikose. Wien Med Wochenschr 166, 297–301 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-016-0464-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-016-0464-z
Schlüsselwörter
- Endovenöse Radiofrequenz- oder Laserablation
- Endovenöse thermische Ablation
- Endovenöse Stammvenenbehandlung