Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Recovery of the Rectoanal Inhibitory Reflex After Restorative Proctocolectomy

Does It Correlate With Nocturnal Continence?

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: The rectoanal inhibitory reflex has an important role in fecal sampling and discrimination of rectal contents. The aim of this study was to determine the significance of rectoanal inhibitory reflex after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for mucosal ulcerative colitis. METHODS: The medical records of 345 patients who underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis from September 1988 to May 1999 were retrospectively reviewed. One hundred patients who underwent double-stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and had anorectal physiology testing within 3 months before surgery as well as after ileostomy closure (mean, 23.1; range, 3–77 months) were analyzed. Anorectal physiology testing included detecting the presence of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex, sensory threshold volume, and rectal or pouch capacity and compliance. Parameters to determine incontinence included daytime and nocturnal bowel movement frequency, nocturnal spotting, status of continence for solid or liquid stool, gas, use of pads, and lifestyle alteration were surveyed in 62 of the 100 patients at a mean of 3.9 (range, 1–9.1) years to determine the incontinence score. RESULTS: Whereas the rectoanal inhibitory reflex was noted in 96 (96 percent) patients before surgery, it was found in only 53 (53 percent) after ileostomy closure (P < 0.0001). Incontinence status data was available in only 62 of the 100 patients (32 RAIR-positive; 30 RAIR-negative). There were no significant differences between the rectoanal inhibitory reflex-positive and the rectoanal inhibitory reflex-negative groups relative to the interval between surgery and manometry (22 vs. 25 months), postoperative threshold sensation volume (32 vs. 31 ml), postoperative compliance (19 vs. 12 cm H2O/ml), postoperative capacity (85 vs. 66 ml), daytime/nighttime stool frequency (6.2/2 vs. 5.5/1.5), or postoperative incontinence score (3.9 vs. 1.8). However, there were significant differences relative to the incidence of nocturnal soiling (12/30 (40 percent) vs. 23/32 (72 percent), P = 0.0012) favoring the presence of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex. CONCLUSION: Preservation of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex correlated with a decrease in the incidence of nocturnal soiling after double-stapled ileoanal reservoir construction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. HL Duthie FW Gairns (1960) ArticleTitleSensory nerve endings and sensation in the anal region of man Br J Surg 48 585–589

    Google Scholar 

  2. DZ Lubowski RJ Nichols M Swash MJ Jordan (1987) ArticleTitleNeural control of internal anal sphincter function Br J Surg 74 668–670

    Google Scholar 

  3. F Tobon NC Reid JL Talbert MM Schuster (1967) ArticleTitleA manometric test for the diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease [abstract] Gastroenterology 52 1143–670

    Google Scholar 

  4. JO Lawson HH Nixon (1967) ArticleTitleAnal canal pressures in the diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease J Pediatr Surg 2 544–552

    Google Scholar 

  5. R Miller DC Bartolo F Cervero NJ Mortensen (1988) ArticleTitleAnorectal sampling Br J Surg 75 44–47

    Google Scholar 

  6. SD Wexner DG Jagelman (1990) ArticleTitleThe double-stapled ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis Perspect Colon Rectal Surg 3 132–144

    Google Scholar 

  7. JM Jorge SD Wexner (1993) ArticleTitleAnorectal manometry South Med J 86 924–931

    Google Scholar 

  8. JM Jorge SD Wexner (1993) ArticleTitleEtiology and management of fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 36 77–97

    Google Scholar 

  10. CN Bernstein R Rollandelli N Niazi et al. (1997) ArticleTitleCharacterization of afferent mechanisms in ileoanal pouches Am J Gastroenterol 92 103–108

    Google Scholar 

  12. K Lindquist (1990) ArticleTitleAnal manometry with microtransducer technique before and after restorative proctocolectomy Dis Colon Rectum 33 91–98

    Google Scholar 

  13. IK Pedersen J Christiansen K Hint P Jensen J Olsen PE Mortensen (1986) ArticleTitleAnorectal function after low anterior resection for carcinoma Ann Surg 204 133–135

    Google Scholar 

  14. IC Otto K Ito C Ye et al. (1996) ArticleTitleCauses of rectal incontinence after sphincter-preserving operations for rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 39 1423–1427

    Google Scholar 

  15. PM Sagar PJ Holdsworth D Johnston (1991) ArticleTitleCorrelation between laboratory findings and clinical outcome after restorative proctocolectomy Br J Surg 78 67–70

    Google Scholar 

  16. AS Miller WG Lewis ME Williamson PM Sagar PJ Holdsworth D Johnston (1996) ArticleTitleDoes eversion of the anorectum during restorative proctocolectomy influence functional outcome? Dis Colon Rectum 39 489–493

    Google Scholar 

  17. B Gunterberg J Kewenter I Petersen B Stener (1976) ArticleTitleAnorectal function after major resections of the sacrum with bilateral or unilateral sacrifice of sacral nerves Br J Surg 63 546–554

    Google Scholar 

  18. F Andreoli F Balloni A Bigiotti et al. (1986) ArticleTitleAnorectal continence and bladder function Dis Colon Rectum 29 647–652

    Google Scholar 

  19. YP Sangwan JA Solla (1998) ArticleTitleInternal anal sphincter Dis Colon Rectum 41 1297–1311

    Google Scholar 

  21. MG O’Riordain RG Molloy P Gillen A Horgan WO Kirwan (1992) ArticleTitleRectoanal inhibitory reflex following low stapled anterior resection of the rectum Dis Colon Rectum 35 874–878

    Google Scholar 

  22. KE Matzel U Stadelmaier S Muehldorfer W Hohenberger (1997) ArticleTitleContinence after colorectal reconstruction following resection Int J Colorectal Dis 12 82–87

    Google Scholar 

  23. S Nakahara H Itoh R Mibu et al. (1988) ArticleTitleClinical and manometric evaluation of anorectal function following low anterior resection with low anastomotic line using an EEA stapler for rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 31 762–766

    Google Scholar 

  24. PJ Holdsworth D Johnston (1988) ArticleTitleAnal sensation after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis Br J Surg 75 993–996

    Google Scholar 

  25. JM Jorge SD Wexner PJ Morgado SuffixJr K James JJ Nogueras DG Jagelman (1994) ArticleTitleOptimization of sphincter function after the ileoanal reservoir procedure Dis Colon Rectum 37 419–423

    Google Scholar 

  26. NS Williams DE Marzouk RI Hallen DJ Waldron (1989) ArticleTitleFunction after ileal pouch and stapled pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis Br J Surg 76 1168–1171

    Google Scholar 

  27. JM Sarmiento JH Pemberton WT Reilly (1997) ArticleTitlePhysiologic determinants of nocturnal incontinence after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis J Gastrointest Surg 1 324–330

    Google Scholar 

  28. YK Ho C Tsang CL Tang D Nyam KW Eu F Seow-Choen (2000) ArticleTitleAnal sphincter injuries from stapling instruments introduced transanally Dis Colon Rectum 43 169–173

    Google Scholar 

  29. WF Floyd EW Walls (1953) ArticleTitleElectromyography of the sphincter ani externus in man J Physiol 122 482–489

    Google Scholar 

  30. S Fujita M Kusunoki Y Shoji T Owada J Utsunomiya (1992) ArticleTitleQuality of life after total proctocolectomy and ileal J-pouch-anal anastomosis Dis Colon Rectum 35 1030–1039

    Google Scholar 

  31. WT Reilly JH Pemberton BG Wolff et al. (1997) ArticleTitleRandomized prospective trial comparing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by excising the anal mucosa to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by preserving the anal mucosa Ann Surg 225 666–676

    Google Scholar 

  32. HJ Sugerman HH Newsome RN Decosta AM Zfass (1991) ArticleTitleStapled ileoanal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis without a temporary diverting ileostomy Ann Surg 213 606–617

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

    Authors
    1. Naoto Saigusa M.D.
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Bruce M. Belin M.D.
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Hong-Jo Choi M.D.
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Pascal Gervaz M.D.
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Jonathan E. Efron M.D.
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Eric G. Weiss M.D.
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Juan J. Nogueras M.D.
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    8. Steven D. Wexner M.D.
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Saigusa, N., Belin, B.M., Choi, HJ. et al. Recovery of the Rectoanal Inhibitory Reflex After Restorative Proctocolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 46, 168–172 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6519-z

    Download citation

    • Issue Date:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6519-z

    Keywords

    Search

    Navigation