Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The effects of forest management on terrestrial habitats of a rare and a common newt species

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Forest Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many amphibian species spend part of their life cycle in terrestrial habitats. However, their exact requirements regarding terrestrial habitats have often remained enigmatic. We aimed to compare the terrestrial habitat use of a common (smooth newt) and a rare newt (great crested newt) species around their breeding ponds, to see whether habitat preferences are linked to the rarity of a species. We tested the effects of forest habitat characteristics on newt populations of seven ponds. The ponds were monitored with terrestrial drift fences at different distances and in different habitats surrounding seven ponds in southeastern Finland during 2 years. We fitted all models using a Poisson generalized linear mixed model. Both newt species distinctly favored forests with high understory vegetation cover. Captures were most numerous in the old forests directly adjacent to the ponds. Both the common species and the rare species showed similar habitat use, but there was an indication that the rare species avoided clear-cut areas and had more need for the shelter provided by canopy and field-layer vegetation, especially when the distance to pond increased. Based on our findings, the maintenance of sheltering vegetation around the ponds is very important, especially for the rare species. However, this requires the retention of both field-layer and canopy coverage, and specific management principles—such as avoiding clear-cuts—should be adopted to maintain favorable conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AmphibiaWeb (2014) Information on amphibian biology and conservation, Lissotriton vulgaris. http://amphibiaweb.org. Accessed 16 Sept 2014

  • Arntzen JW et al. (2009a) Lissotriton vulgaris. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 6 June 2013

  • Arntzen JW et al. (2009b) Triturus cristatus. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed June 6 2013

  • Ash AN (1997) Disappearance and return of plethodontid salamanders to clearcut plots in the southern Blue Ridge Mountains. Conserv Biol 11:983–989. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96172.x

  • Baldwin RF, Calhoun AJK, deMaynadier PG (2006) Conservation planning for amphibian species with complex habitat requirements: a case study using movements and habitat selection of the Wood Frog Rana sylvatica. J Herpetol 40:442–453. doi:10.1670/0022-1511(2006)40[442:cpfasw]2.0.co;2

  • Barbier S, Gosselin F, Balandier P (2008) Influence of tree species on understory vegetation diversity and mechanisms involved—a critical review for temperate and boreal forests. For Ecol Manag 254:1–15. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bol L (2007) Massachusetts forestry conservation management practices for MESA-listed mole salamanders, version 2007.1. Westborough, Massachusetts, USA

  • Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH, White JSS (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24:127–135. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowne DR, Bowers MA (2004) Interpatch movements in spatially structured populations: a literature review. Landsc Ecol 19:1–20. doi:10.1023/B:LAND.0000018357.45262.b9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breslow NE, Clayton DG (1993) Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. J Am Stat Assoc 88:9–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks RT, Kyker-Snowman TD (2008) Forest floor temperature and relative humidity following timber harvesting in southern New England, USA. For Ecol Manag 254:65–73. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.07.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulger JB, Scott NJ, Seymour RB (2003) Terrestrial activity and conservation of adult California red-legged frogs Rana aurora draytonii in coastal forests and grasslands. Biol Conserv 110:85–95. doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(02)00179-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr LW, Fahrig L (2001) Effect of road traffic on two amphibian species of differing vagility. Conserv Biol 15:1071–1078. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.0150041071.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosentino BJ, Schooley RL, Phillips CA (2011) Connectivity of agroecosystems: dispersal costs can vary among crops. Landsc Ecol 26:371–379. doi:10.1007/s10980-010-9563-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • deMaynadier PG, Hunter ML (1998) Effects of silvicultural edges on the distribution and abundance of amphibians in Maine. Conserv Biol 12:340–352. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96412.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • deMaynadier PG, Hunter ML (2000) Road effects on amphibian movements in a forested landscape. Nat Areas J 20:56–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Denoel M, Perez A, Cornet Y, Ficetola GF (2013) Similar local and landscape processes affect both a common and a rare newt species. PLoS One 8:1–11. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolmen D (1988) Coexistence and niche segregation in the newts Triturus vulgaris (L.) and T. cristatus (Laurenti). Amphib Reptil 9:365–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duguid MC, Ashton MS (2013) A meta-analysis of the effect of forest management for timber on understory plant species diversity in temperate forests. For Ecol Manag 303:81–90. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2013.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eigenbrod F, Hecnar SJ, Fahrig L (2008) Accessible habitat: an improved measure of the effects of habitat loss and roads on wildlife populations. Landsc Ecol 23:159–168. doi:10.1007/s10980-007-9174-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eycott AE, Stewart GB, Buyung-Ali LM, Bowler DE, Watts K, Pullin AS (2012) A meta-analysis on the impact of different matrix structures on species movement rates. Landsc Ecol 27:1263–1278. doi:10.1007/s10980-012-9781-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L, Pedlar JH, Pope SE, Taylor PD, Wegner JF (1995) Effect of road traffic on amphibian density. Biol Conserv 73:177–182. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(94)00102-v

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freidenfelds NA, Purrenhage JL, Babbitt KJ (2011) The effects of clearcuts and forest buffer size on post-breeding emigration of adult wood frogs (Lithobates sylvaticus). For Ecol Manag 261:2115–2122. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2011.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (1997) What is rarity? In: Kunin WE, Gaston KJ (eds) The biology of rarity, causes and consequences of rare-common differences, population and community biology series, vol 17. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 30–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Kunin WE (1997a) Concluding remarks. In: Kunin WE, Gaston KJ (eds) The biology of rarity, causes and consequences of rare-common differences, population and community biology series, vol 17. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 262–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Kunin WE (1997b) Rare-common differences: an overview. In: Kunin WE, Gaston KJ (eds) The biology of rarity, causes and consequences of rare-common differences, population and community biology series, vol 17. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 12–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs JP (1998) Amphibian movements in response to forest edges, roads, and streambeds in southern New England. J Wildl Manag 62:584–589. doi:10.2307/3802333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould WR, Patla DA, Daley R, Corn PS, Hossack BR, Bennetts R, Peterson CR (2012) Estimating occupancy in large landscapes: evaluation of amphibian monitoring in the greater yellowstone ecosystem. Wetlands 32:379–389. doi:10.1007/s13157-012-0273-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths RA, Dewijer P (1994) Differential effects of pH and temperature on embryonic development in British newts (Triturus). J Zool 234:613–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths RA, Mylotte VJ (1987) Microhabitat selection and feeding relations of smooth and warty newts, Triturus vulgaris and T. cristatus, at an upland pond in Mid-Wales. Holarct Ecol 10:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths RA, Dewijer P, May RT (1994) Predation and competition within an assemblage of larval newts (Triturus). Ecography 17:176–181. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.1994.tb00091.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulve PS (1994) Distribution and extinction patterns within a northern metapopulation of the pool frog, Rana lessonae. Ecology 75:1357–1367. doi:10.2307/1937460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Ovaskainen O (2000) The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature 404:755–758. doi:10.1038/35008063

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hotanen J-P, Nousiainen H, Mäkipää R, Reinikainen A, Tonteri T (2008) Metsätyypit—opas kasvupaikkojen luokitteluun. Metsäkustannus, Hämeenlinna

    Google Scholar 

  • Houlahan JE, Findlay CS (2003) The effects of adjacent land use on wetland amphibian species richness and community composition. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 60:1078–1094. doi:10.1139/f03-095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehle R (2000) The terrestrial summer habitat of radio-tracked great crested newts (Triturus cristatus) and marbled newts (T. marmoratus). Herpetol J 10:137–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehle R, Arntzen JW (2000) Post-breeding migrations of newts (Triturus cristatus and T. marmoratus) with contrasting ecological requirements. J Zool 251:297–306. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2000.tb01080.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovar R, Brabec M, Vita R, Bocek R (2009) Spring migration distances of some central European amphibian species. Amphib Reptil 30:367–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunin WE (1997) Introduction: on the causes and consequences of rare-common differences. In: Kunin WE, Gaston KJ (eds) The biology of rarity, causes and consequences of rare-common differences, population and community biology series, vol 17. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 3–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakka J, Kouki J (2009) Patterns of field layer invertebrates in successional stages of managed boreal forest: implications for the declining Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus L. population. For Ecol Manag 257:600–607. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamoureux VS, Maerz JC, Madison DM (2002) Premigratory autumn foraging forays in the green frog, Rana clamitans. J Herpetol 36:245–254. doi:10.1670/0022-1511(2002)036[0245:paffit]2.0.co;2

  • Lande R (1988) Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241:1455–1460. doi:10.1126/science.3420403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malmgren JC, Andersson PA, Ekdahl S (2007) Modelling terrestrial interactions and shelter use in great crested newts (Triturus cristatus). Amphib Reptil 28:205–215. doi:10.1163/156853807780202431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazerolle MJ, Desrochers A (2005) Landscape resistance to frog movements. Can J Zool 83:455–464. doi:10.1139/z05-032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müllner A (2001) Spatial patterns of migrating great crested newts and smooth newts: the importance of the terrestrial habitat surrounding the breeding pond. In: Krone A (ed) Der Kammmolch (Triturus cristatus) Verbreitung, Biologie, Ökologie and Schutz. Rana, vol 4, pp 279–293

  • Patrick DA, Hunter ML, Calhoun AJK (2006) Effects of experimental forestry treatments on a Maine amphibian community. For Ecol Manag 234:323–332. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.07.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainio H (1983) The Tuupovaara end moraine in North Karelia, Eastern Finland—an ice marginal formation of the same age as the Salpausselkä ridges. Bull Geol Soc Finl 55:67–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittenhouse TAG, Semlitsch RD (2006) Grasslands as movement barriers for a forest-associated salamander: migration behavior of adult and juvenile salamanders at a distinct habitat edge. Biol Conserv 131:14–22. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.01.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittenhouse TAG, Semlitsch RD (2007) Postbreeding habitat use of wood frogs in a Missouri oak-hickory forest. J Herpetol 41:645–653. doi:10.1670/07-015.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML, Lomolino MV (1997) Who gets the short bits of the broken stick? In: Kunin WE, Gaston KJ (eds) The biology of rarity, causes and consequences of rare-common differences, population and community biology series, vol 17. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 63–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothermel BB (2004) Migratory success of juveniles: a potential constraint on connectivity for pond-breeding amphibians. Ecol Appl 14:1535–1546. doi:10.1890/03-5206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schabetsberger R, Jehle R, Maletzky A, Pesta J, Sztatecsny M (2004) Delineation of terrestrial reserves for amphibians: post-breeding migrations of Italian crested newts (Triturus c. carnifex) at high altitude. Biol Conserv 117:95–104. doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(03)00268-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD (2000) Principles for management of aquatic-breeding amphibians. J Wildl Manag 64:615–631. doi:10.2307/3802732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD (2008) Differentiating migration and dispersal processes for pond-breeding amphibians. J Wildl Manag 72:260–267. doi:10.2193/2007-082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD, Bodie JR (2003) Biological criteria for buffer zones around wetlands and riparian habitats for amphibians and reptiles. Conserv Biol 17:1219–1228. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02177.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinsch U (1990) Migration and orientation in anuran amphibians. Ethol Ecol Evol 2:65–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skei JK, Dolmen D, Ronning L, Ringsby TH (2006) Habitat use during the aquatic phase of the newts Triturus vulgaris (L.) and T. cristatus (Laurenti) in central Norway: proposition for a conservation and monitoring area. Amphib Reptil 27:309–324. doi:10.1163/156853806778189972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skelly DK, Werner EE, Cortwright SA (1999) Long-term distributional dynamics of a Michigan amphibian assemblage. Ecology 80:2326–2337. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[2326:ltddoa]2.0.co;2

  • Smith MA, Green DM (2005) Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: are all amphibian populations metapopulations? Ecography 28:110–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith KJ, Keeton WS, Twery MJ, Tobi DR (2008) Understory plant responses to uneven-aged forestry alternatives in northern hardwood-conifer forests. Can J For Res 38:1303–1318. doi:10.1139/x07-236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens VM, Leboulenge E, Wesselingh RA, Baguette M (2006) Quantifying functional connectivity: experimental assessment of boundary permeability for the natterjack toad (Bufo calamita). Oecologia 150:161–171. doi:10.1007/s00442-006-0500-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Young BE, Rodrigues ASL, Fischman DL, Waller RW (2004) Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 306:1783–1786. doi:10.1126/science.1103538

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sztatecsny M, Schabetsberger R (2005) Into thin air: vertical migration, body condition, and quality of terrestrial habitats of alpine common toads, Bufo bufo. Can J Zool 83:788–796. doi:10.1139/z05-071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terhivuo J, Mannerkoski I (2010) Matelijat ja sammakkoeläimet. In: Rassi P, Hyvärinen E, Juslén A, Mannerkoski I (eds) The 2010 Red List of Finnish species. Ympäristöministeriö & Suomen ympäristökeskus, Helsinki, pp 332–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, May RM, Lehman CL, Nowak MA (1994) Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371:65–66. doi:10.1038/371065a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trenham PC, Koenig WD, Mossman MJ, Stark SL, Jagger LA (2003) Regional dynamics of wetland-breeding frogs and toads: turnover and synchrony. Ecol Appl 13:1522–1532. doi:10.1890/02-5206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Buskirk J (2005) Local and landscape influence on amphibian occurrence and abundance. Ecology 86:1936–1947. doi:10.1890/04-1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Buskirk J (2012) Permeability of the landscape matrix between amphibian breeding sites. Ecol Evol 2:3160–3167. doi:10.1002/ece3.424

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vos CC, Chardon JP (1998) Effects of habitat fragmentation and road density on the distribution pattern of the moor frog Rana arvalis. J Appl Ecol 35:44–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vuorio V (2009) Suomen uhanalaisia lajeja: Rupilisko (Triturus cristatus). Suomen ympäristö, vol. 34. Pohjois-Karjalan ympäristökeskus, Joensuu

  • Vuorio V, Heikkinen RK, Tikkanen OP (2013) Breeding success of the threatened great crested newt in boreal forest ponds. Ann Zool Fenn 50:158–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vuorio V, Reunanen P, Tikkanen O-P (2015) Spatial context of breeding ponds and forest management affect the distribution and population dynamics of the great crested newt (in press)

  • Zenner EK, Lahde E, Laiho O (2011) Contrasting the temporal dynamics of stand structure in even- and uneven-sized Picea abies dominated stands. Can J For Res 41:289–299. doi:10.1139/x10-205

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Riikka Airivuo, Raisa Pasanen, and all the other persons for their valuable assistance with the field work. We thank Jörg Müller, Teemu Tahvanainen, and an anonymous referee for constructive commenting. This study was funded by the Maj and Tor Nessling Foundation (Grants 2010230, 2011277, 2012211, and 2013089).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, 80101, Joensuu, Finland

    Ville Vuorio & Jari Kouki

  2. Department of Biology, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, 80101, Joensuu, Finland

    Olli-Pekka Tikkanen

  3. School of Computing, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, 80101, Joensuu, Finland

    Lauri Mehtätalo

Authors
  1. Ville Vuorio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Olli-Pekka Tikkanen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lauri Mehtätalo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jari Kouki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ville Vuorio.

Additional information

Communicated by Jörg Müller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vuorio, V., Tikkanen, OP., Mehtätalo, L. et al. The effects of forest management on terrestrial habitats of a rare and a common newt species. Eur J Forest Res 134, 377–388 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-014-0858-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-014-0858-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation