Abstract
Empirical allometric equations relating biomass of aboveground components to dendrometric variables for Pinus brutia Ten. trees are derived in this paper. They are based on data collected from Lesvos (North Aegean Sea) and Crete (South Aegean Sea) Islands. Comparisons to published equations for the same species growing in northwestern and southeastern Turkey, for Pinus nigra A. growing in Turkey and Pinus halepensis Mill. found in Western Aegean (island of Evia), are also presented. The biomass of branches from destructively sampled trees (twelve in Crete and six in Lesvos) was divided into four size classes (0–0.63 cm, 0.64–2.5 cm, 2.51–7.61 cm, and 7.62–22.8 cm). Tree crown biomass was calculated as the sum of the biomass in the four classes plus the fraction of stem above crown base. Over bark stem biomass was estimated through bole volume conversion based on wood density. The results showed clearly that, for a given diameter, the Cretan trees had more crown biomass and a higher share of small branches than trees on Lesvos, probably due to differences in environment and stand structure. Comparisons to published diameter versus crown biomass equations reveal a lower crown biomass for Turkish sites of Calabrian pine and Aleppo pine on Evia Island, while only Turkish Black pine seems to be comparable to the Calabrian pine on Crete. The derived allometries can be used for landscape fire behavior modeling, for ecophysiological studies and for the Kyoto protocol requirements of carbon changes in Pinus brutia Ten. forests located in northern and southern Greek sites.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Apatsidis DL, Sifakis C (1994) Computer programme APSI (APatsidis, SIfakis) for the calculation of the dynamic growing stock, volume increament, site index, etc. of beech, fir, black pine, oak, Aleppo pine and Pinus brutia stands. In: Greek Forestry Society (Ed). Proceedings of the 6th Pnahellenic Forest Conference, Chania 6–8 April, pp 409–432 (in Greek)
Baskerville GL (1972) Use of logarithmic regression in the estimation of plant biomass. Can J For Res 2:49–53
Beauchamp JJ, Olson JS (1973) Corrections for bias in regression estimates after logarithmic transformation. Ecology 54:1403–1407
Berezovskava FS, Karev GP, Kisliuk DS, Khlebornos RG, Tsel’niker YL (1997) A fractal approach to computer-analytical modelling of trees crowns. Trees 11:323–327
Bokma F (2004) Evidence against universal metabolic allometry. Funct Ecol 18:184–187
Brown JK (1974) Handbook for inventorying downed woody material. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT-16. Ogden, Utah, 24 p
Burgan RE, Rothermel RC (1984) BEHAVE: fire behavior prediction and fuel modeling system- FUEL subsystem. GTR-INT-167, USDA, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, 126 p
Durkaya A, Durkaya B, Ünsal A (2009) Predicting the above-ground biomass of calabrian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) stands in Turkey. Afr J Biotechnol 8:2483–2488
Eamus D, McGuinness K, Burrows W (2000) Review of allometric relationships for estimating woody biomass for Queensland, the Northern Territory and Western Australia. National Carbon Accounting System Technical Report 5b. Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra
Enquist BJ (2002) Universal scaling in tree and vascular plant allometry: toward a general quantitative theory linking plant form and function from cells to ecosystems. Tree Physiol 22:1045–1064
Fehrmann L, Kleinn C (2006) General considerations about the use of allometric equations for biomass estimation on the example of Norway spruce in central Europe. For Ecol Manag 236:412–421
Finney DJ (1941) On the distribution of a variate whose logarithm is normally distributed. J R Stat Soc Ser B 7:155–161
Furnival GM (1961) An index for comparing equations used in constructing volume tables. For Sci 7:337–341
Huxley JS (1932) Problems of relative growth. Methun, London
Kozlowski J, Konarzewski M (2004) Is West, Brown and Enquist’s model of allometric scaling mathematically correct and biologically relevant? Funct Ecol 18:283–289
Küçük O, Sag˘lam B, Bilgili E (2007) Canopy fuel characteristics and fuel load in young Black pine trees. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 21:235–240
Küçük O, Bilgili E, Sag˘lam B (2008) Estimating crown fuel loading for Calabrian pine and Anatolian black pine. Int J Wildl Fire 17:147–154
Li HT, Han XG, Wu JG (2005) Lack of evidence for 3/4 scaling of metabolism in terrestrial plants. J Integr Plant Biol 47:1173–1183
Madgwick HAI (1970) Biomass and productivity models of forest canopies. In: Reichle DE (ed) Ecological studies 1. Analysis of temperate forest ecosystems. Springer, New York, Heidelberg and Berlin
Madwick HAI, Satoo T (1975) On estimating the aboveground weights of tree stands. Ecology 56:1446–1450
Makarieva AM, Gorshkov VG, Li B (2003) A note of metabolic rate dependence on body size in plants and animals. J Theor Biol 221:301–307
McMahon TA (1973) Size and shape in biology. Science 179:1201–1204
Mitsopoulos ID, Dimitrakopoulos AP (2007a) Allometric equations for crown fuel biomass of Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis Mill.) in Greece. Int J Wildl Fire 16:642–647
Mitsopoulos ID, Dimitrakopoulos AP (2007b) Canopy fuel characteristics and potential crown fire behavior in Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis Mill.) forests. Ann For Sci 64:287–299
Mountford MD, Bunce RGH (1973) Regression sampling with allometrically related variables with particular reference to production studies. Foresty 46:203–212
Niklas KJ (1992) Plant biomechanics: an engineering approach to plant form and function. The University Chicago Press, Chicago and London
Niklas KJ (1994) Plant allometry. The scaling of form and process. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Niklas KJ, Midgley JJ, Enquist BJ (2003) A general model for mass-growth-density relations across tree dominated communities. Evol Ecol Res 5:459–468
Parde J (1980) Forest biomass. For Abstr 41:343–362
Parresol RB (1999) Assessing tree and stand biomass: a review with examples and critical comparisons. For Sci 45:573–593
Payandeh B (1981) Choosing regression models for biomass prediction equations. For Chron 57:229–232
Phillip M (1994) Measuring trees and forests. CABI Publishing, UK and USA
Pilli P, Anfodillo T, Carrer M (2006) Towards a functional and simplified allometry for estimating forest biomass. For Ecol Manag 237:583–593
Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. Research paper INT-115. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station
Rothermel RC (1991) Predicting behavior and size of crown fires in the northern Rocky Mountains. Research paper INT-438. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station
Saint-André L, Thongo M’Bou A, Mabiala A, Mouvondy WJ, Jourdan C, Roupsard O, Deleporte P, Hamel O, Nouvellon Y (2005) Age-related equations for above- and below-ground biomass of a Eucalyptus hybrid in Congo. For Ecol Manag 205:199–214
Scarascia-Mugnozza G, Oswald H, Piussi P, Radoglou K (2000) Forests of the Mediterranean Region: gaps in knowledge and research needs. For Ecol Manag 132:97–109
Sprugel DG (1983) Correcting for bias in log-transformed allometric equations. Ecology 64:209–210
Ter-Mikaelian MT, Korzukhin MD (1997) Biomass equations for sixty-five North American tree species. For Ecol Manag 97:1–24
Van Wagner CE (1977) Conditions for the start and spread of crown fire. Can J For Res 7:23–34
Vanninen P, Ylitalo H, Sievänen R, Mäkelä A (1996) Effects of age and site quality on the distribution of biomass in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Trees 10:231–238
West GB, Brown JH, Enquist BJ (1997) A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology. Science 276:122–126
Wiant HVJ, Harner EJ (1979) Percent bias and standard error in logarithmic regression. For Sci 25:167–168
Xanthopoulos G (1990) Development of a wildland crown fire initiation model. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Montana, MT, USA
Yandle DO, Wiant HV (1981) Estimation of plant biomass based on the allometric equation. Can J For Res 11:833–834
Zar JH (1968) Calculation and miscalculation of the allometric equation as a model in biological data. Bioscience 18:1118–1120
Zerva A, Halyvopoulos G, Radoglou K (2008) Fine root biomass in a beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stand on Paiko Mountain, NW Greece. Plant Biosyst 2:381–385
Zianis D, Mencuccini M (2003) Aboveground biomass relationships for beech (Fagus moesiaca Cz.) trees in Vermio Mountain, Northern Greece, and generalised equations for Fagus spp. Ann For Sci 60:439–448
Zianis D, Mencuccini M (2004) On simplifying allometric analyses of forest biomass. For Ecol Manag 187:311–332
Zianis D, Mencuccini M (2005) Aboveground net primary productivity of a beech (Fagus moesiaca Cz.) forest: the case study of Naousa forest, northern Greece. Tree Phys 25:713–722
Zianis D, Radoglou K (2006) Comparison between empirical and theoretical biomass allometric models and statistical implications for stem volume predictions. Forestry 79:477–487
Zianis D, Muukkonen P, Mäkipää R, Mencuccini M (2005). Biomass and stem volume equations for tree species in Europe. Silva Fennica Monographs No 4
Acknowledgments
The work described in this article was carried out as part of the participation of the Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Chania (MAICh), Crete, Greece and the Department of Geography of the University of the Aegean, Mytilene, Lesvos, Greece, in the FIREGUARD research project, which was co-funded by the European Union, Directorate General for Research (contract number QLK5-CT-2001-00784). This support is gratefully acknowledged. We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions that improved the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by R. Matyssek.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zianis, D., Xanthopoulos, G., Kalabokidis, K. et al. Allometric equations for aboveground biomass estimation by size class for Pinus brutia Ten. trees growing in North and South Aegean Islands, Greece. Eur J Forest Res 130, 145–160 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-010-0417-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-010-0417-9