Skip to main content
Log in

Combined effects of expectations and visual uncertainty upon detection and identification of a target in the fog

  • Short Report
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Detecting a pedestrian while driving in the fog is one situation where the prior expectation about the target presence is integrated with the noisy visual input. We focus on how these sources of information influence the oculomotor behavior and are integrated within an underlying decision-making process. The participants had to judge whether high-/low-density fog scenes displayed on a computer screen contained a pedestrian or a deer by executing a mouse movement toward the response button (mouse-tracking). A variable road sign was added on the scene to manipulate expectations about target identity. We then analyzed the timing and amplitude of the deviation of mouse trajectories toward the incorrect response and, using an eye tracker, the detection time (before fixating the target) and the identification time (fixations on the target). Results revealed that expectation of the correct target results in earlier decisions with less deviation toward the alternative response, this effect being partially explained by the facilitation of target identification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Baayen RH, Davidson DJ, Bates DM (2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J Mem Lang 59(4):390–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn P (2013) Emergence of spontaneous anticipatory hand movements in a probabilistic environment. Adv Cogn Psychol 9(2):62–73

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castelhano MS, Heaven C (2010) The relative contribution of scene context and target features to visual search in scenes. Atten Percept Psychophys 72(5):1283–1297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castelhano MS, Pollatsek A, Cave KR (2008) Typicality aids search for an unspecified target, but only in identification and not in attentional guidance. Psychon Bull Rev 15(4):795–801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dale R, Kehoe C, Spivey MJ (2007) Graded motor responses in the time course of categorizing atypical exemplars. Mem Cognit 35(1):15–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drugowitsch J, Moreno-Bote R, Churchland AK, Shadlen MN, Pouget A (2012) The cost of accumulating evidence in perceptual decision making. J Neurosci 32(11):3612–3628

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flowers JH (1990) Priming effects in perceptual classification. Percept Psychophys 47(2):135–148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman JB, Ambady N (2010) Mouse tracker: software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method. Behav Res Methods 42(1):226–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friston K, Adams RA, Perrinet L, Breakspear M (2012) Perceptions as hypotheses: saccades as experiments. Front Psychol 3:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes AF (2009) Beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the New millennium. Commun Monogr 76(4):408–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth A, Henderson JM (1998) Does consistent scene context facilitate object perception? J Exp Psychol Gen 127(4):398–415

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kietzmann T, Geuter S, König P (2011) Overt visual attention as a causal factor of perceptual awareness. PLoS ONE 6(7):e22614

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lepora N, Pezzulo G (2015) Embodied choice: how action influences perceptual decision making. PLoS Comput Biol 11(4):e1004110

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm GL, Henderson JM (2009) The effects of target template specificity on visual search in real-world scenes: evidence from eye movements. J Vis 9(11):1–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riou B, Rey AE, Vallet GT, Cuny C, Versace R (2014) Perceptual processing affects the reactivation of a sensory dimension during a categorization task. Q J Exp Psychol 68(6):1–8

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was approved by the French Comité de Protection des Personnes “Sud-Est VI” (IRB00008526, CE65, 2014). The authors would like to thank Annique Smeding for her comments on the submitted version of this article.

Funding

This work was funded by grants from the French program “investissement d’avenir” managed by the National Research Agency (ANR), from the European Union (Auvergne European Regional Development Funds -ERDF- of Auvergne region) and from the “Région Auvergne” in the framework of the IMobS3 LabEx (ANR-10-LABX-16-01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boris Quétard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Quétard, B., Quinton, JC., Colomb, M. et al. Combined effects of expectations and visual uncertainty upon detection and identification of a target in the fog. Cogn Process 16 (Suppl 1), 343–348 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0673-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0673-1

Keywords

Navigation