Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Habitat selection and movements of Piping Plover broods suggest a tradeoff between breeding stages

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ornithology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In precocial birds, adults select breeding areas using cues associated with habitat characteristics that are favorable for nesting success and chick survival, but there may be tradeoffs in habitat selection between these breeding stages. Here we describe habitat selection and intra-territory movements of 53 Piping Plover (Charadrius melodus) broods (320 observations) during the 2007–2008 breeding seasons on mainland- and island-shoreline habitats at Lake Sakakawea, North Dakota, USA. We used remotely sensed habitat characteristics to separately examine habitat selection and movements at two spatiotemporal scales to account for potential confounding effects of nest-site selection on brood-rearing habitat used. The scales used were (1) the entire brood-rearing period within available brood-rearing areas and (2) 2-day observation intervals within age-specific discrete habitat selection choice sets. Analyses at both scales indicated that broods selected areas which were non-vegetated, moderately level, and nearer to the shoreline. Rate of brood movement increased with age up to 5 days, then stabilized; broods that hatched >50 m away from the shoreline moved toward the shoreline. Brood movements were greater when they were in vegetated areas, when the brood-rearing area was of greater topographic complexity, and when broods aged 6–25 days were further away from the shoreline. Using inferences from our results and those of previously published work, we postulate how a potential tradeoff in habitat selection between nesting and brood-rearing can contribute to an ecological trap in a novel habitat. This work, in the context of published works, suggests that plover breeding habitat is a complex of both nesting and brood-rearing habitats and provides a basis for making remotely sensed abundance estimates of suitable breeding habitat for Piping Plovers.

Zusammenfassung

Habitatwahl und Ortsbewegungen von Bruten des Gelbfuß-Regenpfeifers zeigen Entscheidungskonflikte zwischen Brutstadien Bei Nestflüchtern wählen die adulten Vögel die Brutgebiete nach Habitateigenschaften, die von Vorteil sind für den Bruterfolg und für das Überleben der Küken, aber es könnte Entscheidungskonflikte (Tradeoffs) bei der Habitatwahl geben zwischen diesen verschiedenen Brutstadien. Wir beschrieben Habitatwahl und intraterritoriale Bewegungen von 53 Bruten des Gelbfuß-Regenpfeifers (Charadrius melodus) anhand von 320 Beobachtungen während der Brutsaison 2007–2008 in Habitaten der Küstenlinien des Festlands und von Inseln am See Sakakawea in North Dakota, USA. Wir verwendeten Habitateigenschaften aus Fernerkundungsdaten, um Habitatwahl und Bewegungen auf zwei raumzeitlichen Skalen einzeln zu betrachten und um zufällig verbundenen Effekten zwischen Brutplatzwahl und Aufzuchthabitat Rechnung zu tragen. Die verwendeten Skalen waren (1) die gesamte Aufzuchtperiode in für die Aufzucht verfügbaren Gebieten und (2) 2-tägige Beobachtungsintervalle innerhalb von altersspezifischen, diskreten Sätzen von Habitatauswahlmöglichkeiten. Die Analysen zeigten, dass für die Bruten Gebiete gewählt wurden, die unbewachsen waren, einigermaßen eben und näher an der Küste. Die Anzahl von Bewegungen in den Bruten nahm bis zum Alter von fünf Tagen zu und stabilisierte sich dann. Bruten, die mehr als 50 m von der Küste entfernt schlüpften, bewegten sich in Richtung der Küste. Die Bewegungen der Bruten waren größer in Gebieten mit Bewuchs, von höherer topographischer Komplexität und wenn 6 bis 25 Tage alte Bruten weiter von der Küste entfernt waren. Aus unseren eigenen Ergebnissen und veröffentlichten Arbeiten stellen wir zur Diskussion, wie ein möglicher Entscheidungskonflikt zwischen Brüten und Aufzucht bei der Habitatwahl zu einer ökologischen Falle in einem neuen Habitat beitragen kann. Diese Arbeit deutet im Kontext von früher veröffentlichten Arbeiten darauf hin, dass die Definition eines Bruthabitats beim Gelbfuß-Regenpfeifer aus einem Komplex besteht aus sowohl Habitat für Brüten als auch für Aufzucht. Sie schafft eine Grundlage zur Abschätzungen der Häufigkeit von Bruthabitaten für Gelbfuß-Regenpfeifer aus Fernerkundungsdaten.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amat JA, Masero JA (2004) Predation risk on incubating adults constrains the choice of thermally favourable nest sites in a plover. Anim Behav 67:293–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson DJ (1982) The home range: a new nonparametric estimation technique. Ecology 63:103–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anteau MJ, Sherfy MH (2010) Diurnal variation in invertebrate catch rates by sticky traps: potential for biased indices of Piping Plover forage. Wetlands 30:757–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anteau MJ, Shaffer TL, Sherfy MH, Sovada MA, Stucker JH, Wiltermuth MT (2012a) Nest survival of Piping Plovers at a dynamic reservoir indicates an ecological trap for a threatened population. Oecologia 170:1167–1179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anteau MJ, Sherfy MH, Wiltermuth MT (2012b) Selection indicates preference in diverse habitats: a ground-nesting bird (Charadrius melodus) using reservoir shoreline. PLoS One 7:e30347

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anteau MJ, Shaffer TL, Wiltermuth MT, Sherfy MH (2014a) Landscape selection by Piping Plovers has implications for measuring habitat and population size. Landsc Ecol 29:1033–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anteau MJ, Wiltermuth MT, Sherfy MH, Shaffer TL (2014b) Measuring and predicting abundance and dynamics of habitat for Piping Plovers on a large reservoir. Ecol Model 272:16–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anteau MJ, Wiltermuth MT, Sherfy MH, Shaffer TL, Pearse AT (2014c) Role of landscape features and density dependence in growth and fledging rates of Piping Plovers in North Dakota, USA. Condor 116:195–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold TW (2010) Uninformative parameters and model selection using Akaike’s information criterion. J Wildl Manage 74:1175–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur SM, Manly BFJ, McDonald LL, Garner GW (1996) Assessing habitat selection when availability changes. Ecology 77:215–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomqvist D, Johansson OC (1995) Trade-offs in nest site selection in coastal populations of lapwings Vanellus vanellus. Ibis 137:550–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brudney LJ, Arnold TW, Saunders SP, Cuthbert FJ (2013) Survival of Piping Plover (Charadrius melodus) chicks in the Great Lakes region. Auk 130:150–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger J (1987) Physical and social determinants of nest-site selection in Piping Plover in New Jersey. Condor 89:811–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Calenge C (2006) The package “adehabitat” for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecol Model 197:516–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper AB, Millspaugh JJ (1999) The application of discrete choice models to wildlife resource selection studies. Ecology 80:566–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defos du Rau P, Barbraud C, Mondain-Monval J-Y (2003) Estimating breeding population size of the Red-crested pochard (Netta rufina) in the Camargue (southern France) taking into account detection probability: implications for conservation. Anim Conserv 6:379–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreitz VJ (2009) Parental behaviour of a precocial species: implications for juvenile survival. J Appl Ecol 46:870–878

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elias SP, Fraser JD, Buckley PA (2000) Piping Plover brood foraging ecology on New York Barrier Islands. J Wildl Manage 64:346–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott-Smith E, Haig SM (2004) Piping Plover. In: Poole A (ed) The birds of North America Online. Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca. Available at: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/BNA/account/Piping_Plover/

  • Elliott-Smith E, Haig SM, Powers BM (2009) Data from the 2006 International Piping Plover Census. U.S. Geol Surv Data Serv 426:332

    Google Scholar 

  • Espie RHM, Brigham RM, James PC (1996) Habitat selection and clutch fate of Piping Plovers (Charadrius melodus) breeding at Lake Diefenbaker, Saskatchewan. Can J Zool 74:1069–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espie RHM, James PC, Brigham RM (1998) The effects of flooding on Piping Plover (Charadrius melodus) reproductive success at Lake Diefenbaker, Saskatchewan, Canada. Biol Conserv 86:215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier G (1987) Brood territories in Buffleheads: determinants and correlates of territory size. Can J Zool 65:1402–1410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Serrano MÁ, López-López P (2014) Nest site selection by Kentish Plover suggests a trade-off between nest-crypsis and predator detection strategies. PLoS One 9:e107121

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haffner CD, Cuthbert FJ, Arnold TW (2009) Space use by Great Lakes Piping Plovers during the breeding season. J Field Ornithol 80:270–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hays H, LeCroy M (1971) Field criteria for determining incubation stage in eggs of the Common Tern. Wilson Bull 83:425–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DH (1980) The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61:65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenward R (1987) Wildlife radio tagging. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Knetter JM, Lutz RS, Cary JR, Murphy RK (2002) A multi-scale investigation of Piping Plover productivity on Great Plains alkali lakes, 1994–2000. Wildlife Soc B 30:683–694

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosztolányi A, Székely T, Cuthill I (2007) The function of habitat change during brood-rearing in the precocial Kentish Plover Charadrius alexandrinus. Acta Ethol 10:73–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse CD, Higgins KF, Vander Lee BA (2001) Influence of predation on Piping Plover, Charadrius melodus, and Least Tern, Sterna antillarum, productivity along the Missouri River in South Dakota. Can Field Nat 115:480–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Fer D, Fraser JD, Kruse CD (2008a) Piping Plover chick foraging, growth, and survival in the Great Plains. J Wildl Manage 72:682–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Fer D, Fraser JD, Kruse CD (2008b) Piping plover forage-site selection on the Missouri River. Waterbirds 31:587–592

    Google Scholar 

  • Lengyel S (2007) Benefits of large broods by higher chick survival and better territories in a precocial shorebird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:589–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loegering JP, Fraser JD (1995) Factors affecting Piping Plover chick survival in different brood-rearing habitats. J Wildl Manage 59:646–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Lachman GB, Droege S, Andrew Royle J, Langtimm CA (2002) Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83:2248–2255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly BFJ, McDonald LL, Thomas DL, McDonald TL, Erickson WP (2002) Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. Kluwer Academic, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald TL, Manly BFJ, Nielson RM, Diller LV (2006) Discrete-choice modeling in wildlife studies exemplified by Northern Spotted owl nighttime habitat selection. J Wildl Manage 70:375–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller EH (1979) Functions of display flights by males of the Least Sandpiper, Calidris minutilla (Vieill.), on Sable Island, Nova Scotia. Can J Zool 57:876–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy RK, Root BG, Mayer PM, Goossen JP, Smith KA (1999) A draft protocol for assessing Piping Plover reproductive success on the Great Plains alkali lakes. In: Higgins K, Brashier M, Kruse CD (eds) Proceedings, Piping Plovers and Least Terns of the Great Plains and Nearby. South Dakota State University, Brookings, pp 90–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearse AT, Ratti JT, Sheaffer (2004) Effects of predator removal on Mallard duckling survival. J Wildl Manag 68:342–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pehrsson O, Nyström KGK (1988) Growth and movements of Oldsquaw ducklings in relation to food. J Wildl Manage 52:185–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell AN, Cuthbert FJ (1992) Habitat and reproductive success of Piping Plovers nesting on Great Lakes islands. Wilson Bull 104:155–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöysä H, Elmberg J, Sjöberg K, Nummi P (2000) Nesting mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) forecast brood-stage food limitation when selecting habitat: experimental evidence. Oecologia 122:582–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Prindiville Gaines EM, Ryan MR (1988) Piping Plover habitat use and reproductive success in North Dakota. J Wildl Manage 52:266–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Development Core Team R (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Robsertson BA, Hutto RL (2006) A framework for understanding ecological traps and an evaluation of existing evidence. Ecology 87:1075–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roche EA, Gratto-Trevor CL, Goossen JP, White CL (2012) Flooding affects dispersal decisions in Piping Plovers (Charadrius melodus) in prairie Canada. Auk 129:296–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roche EA, Shaffer TL, Anteau MJ, Sherfy MH, Stucker JH, Wiltermuth MT, Dovichin CM (2014) Detection probability of Least Tern and Piping Plover chicks in a large river system. J Wildl Manag 78:709–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotella JJ, Ratti JT (1992) Mallard brood movements and wetland selection in southwestern Manitoba. J Wildl Manag 56:508–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant GA (2011) wild1: R tools for wildlife research and management, R package version 1.09 edn. U.S. Geol Surv Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, Jamestown

  • SAS Institute (2002) SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 9. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Schekkerman H, Visser GH (2001) Prefledging energy requirements in shorebirds: energetic implications of self-feeding precocial development. Auk 118:944–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedinger JS (1992) Ecology of prefledging waterfowl. In: Batt BDJ (ed) Ecology and management of breeding waterfowl. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer TL, Sherfy MH, Anteau MJ, Stucker JH, Sovada MA, Roche EA, Wiltermuth MT, Buhl TK, Dovichin CM (2013) Accuracy of the Missouri River Least Tern and Piping Plover monitoring program: considerations for the future. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 2013–1176

  • Sherfy MH, Stucker JH, Anteau MJ (2009) Missouri River emergent sandbar habitat monitoring plan—a conceptual framework for adaptive management. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008–1223. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston

  • Talent LG, Krapu GL, Jarvis RL (1982) Habitat use by Mallard broods in south central North Dakota. J Wildl Manage 46:629–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson WL, White GC, Gowan C (1998) Monitoring vertebrate populations. Academic Press, Sand Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) (2010) Monthly reservoir summary (0168’s). US Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha

  • US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (1985) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: determination of endangered and threatened status for the Piping Plover; final rule. Fed Reg 50:50726–50734

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson CA, Colwell MA (2010) Movements and fledging success of Snowy Plover (Charadrius alexandrinus) chicks. Waterbirds 33:331–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiltermuth MT, Anteau MJ, Sherfy MH, Shaffer TL (2009) Nest movement by Piping Plovers in response to changing habitat conditions. Condor 111:550–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Missouri River Recovery Program through financial and logistical support from the Corps’ Omaha District Threatened and Endangered Species Section and Garrison Project Office. We are grateful for technical support by the USGS Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Missouri River Least Tern and Piping Plover Research Team, and especially to Melisa Bernard, Betty Euliss, Nickolas Smith, and Larry Strong for assistance with spatial data and remote sensing. We thank Phil Brown, Deb Buhl, Tom Buhl, Colin Dovichin, Anthony Hipp, Coral Huber, Casey Kruse, Michael Morris, Terry Shaffer, Brandi Skone, Nickolas Smith, Marsha Sovada, Jennifer Stucker, and Ryan Williamson for their help with project planning and logistics, and the many field technicians for their assistance with data collection. We thank Juan A. Amat, Glen A. Sargeant, and anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. Our field protocols were approved by the USGS Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Animal Care and Use Committee. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark T. Wiltermuth.

Additional information

Communicated by C. Barbraud.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wiltermuth, M.T., Anteau, M.J., Sherfy, M.H. et al. Habitat selection and movements of Piping Plover broods suggest a tradeoff between breeding stages. J Ornithol 156, 999–1013 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-015-1227-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-015-1227-0

Keywords

Navigation