Skip to main content
Log in

A grid-based rainfall-runoff model for flood simulation including paddy fields

  • Article
  • Published:
Paddy and Water Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A grid-based, KIneMatic wave STOrm Runoff Model (KIMSTORM) is described. The model adopts the single flow-path algorithm and routes the water balance during the storm period. Manning’s roughness coefficient adjustment function of the paddy cell was applied to simulate the flood mitigation effect of the paddy fields for the grid-based, distributed rainfall-runoff modeling. The model was tested in 2296 km2 dam watershed in South Korea using six typhoon storm events occurring between 2000 and 2007 with 500 m spatial resolution, and the results were tested through the automatic model evaluation functions in the model. The average values of the Nash–Sutcliffe model efficiency (ME), the volume conservation index (VCI), the relative error of peak runoff rate (EQp), and the absolute error of peak runoff (ETp) were 0.974, 1.016, 0.019, and 0.45 h for calibrated storm events and 0.975, 0.951, 0.029, and 0.50 h for verified storm events, respectively. In the simulation of the flood mitigation effect of the paddy fields, the average values of the percentage changes for peak runoff, total runoff volume, and time to peak runoff were only −1.95, −0.93, and 0.19%, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott MB, Bathurst JC, Cunge JA, O’Connell PE, Rasmussen J (1986a) An introduction to the European Hydrological System—Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, ‘SHE’, 1: history and philosophy of a physically-based, distributed modeling system. J Hydrol 87:45–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott MB, Bathurst JC, Cunge JA, O’Connell PE, Rasmussen J (1986b) An introduction to the European Hydrological System—Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, ‘SHE’, 2: structure of a physically-based, distributed modeling system. J Hydrol 87:61–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beasley DB, Huggins LF, Monke EJ (1980) ANSWERS: a model for watershed planning. Trans ASAE 23(4):938–944

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell VA, Kay AL, Jones RG, Moore RJ (2007) Development of a high resolution grid-based river flow model for use with regional climate model output. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11:532–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven KJ (1982) On subsurface stormflow: predictions with simple kinematic theory for saturated and unsaturated flows. Water Resour Res 18:1627–1633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven KJ (1996) A discussion of distributed modeling, chap 13A. In: Refsgaard JC, Abbott MB (eds) Distributed hydrological modelling. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 255–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Beven KJ, Kirkby MJ (1979) A physically based variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol Sci Bull 24(1):43–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow VT, Maidment DR, Mays LW (eds) (1988) Applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 20–52

  • Chung HW, Kim SJ, Choi JY, Kim DS (1995) GIS application model for temporal and spatial simulation of surface runoff from a small watershed. GIS Assoc Korea 3(2):135–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Downer CW, Ogden FL (2003) Gridded surface subsurface hydrologic analysis user’s manual. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson RB, Moore ID, McMahon TA (1992) Physically based hydrological modeling: 1. A terrain-based model for investigative purposes. Water Resour Res 28(10):2639–2658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grayson RB, Blöschl G, Moore ID (1995) Distributed parameter hydrologic modeling using vector elevation data: THALES and TAPES-C. In: Singh VP (ed) Computer models of watershed hydrology. Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, pp 669–696

    Google Scholar 

  • Griensven A, Meixner T, Grunwald S, Bishop T, Diluzio M, Srinivasan R (2006) A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models. J Hydrol 324:10–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellweger FL (1997) AGREE-DEM surface reconditioning system. University of Texas. http://www.ce.utexas.edu/prof/maidment/gishydro/ferdi/research/agree/agree.html. Accessed 3 April 2003

  • Huggins LF, Monke EJ (1968) A mathematical model for simulating the hydrologic response of a watershed. Water Resour Res 4(3):529–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain MK, Kothyari UC, Ranga Raju KG (2004) A GIS based distributed rainfall-runoff model. J Hydrol 299:107–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jinkang D, Shunping X, Youpeng X, Chong-yu X, Singh VP (2007) Development and testing of a simple physically-based distributed rainfall-runoff model for storm runoff simulation in humid forested basins. J Hydrol 336:334–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julien PY, Saghafian B, Ogden FL (1995) Raster based hydrological modeling of spatially-varied surface runoff. Water Resour Bull AWRA 31(3):523–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung IK, Kim SJ (2003) Comparison of DEM preprocessing method for efficient watershed and stream network extraction. KSCE J Civ Eng 23(3):393–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung IK, Lee MS, Park JY, Kim SJ (2008) A Modified grid-based KIneMatic wave STOrm Runoff Model (ModKIMSTORM), I. Theory and model. KSCE J Civ Eng 28(6):697–707

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim SJ (1998) Grid-based KIneMatic Wave STOrm Runoff Model (KIMSTORM), I. Theory and model. J Korea Water Resour Assoc 30(3):303–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim SJ (2001) GIS-based water resources management information system (WAMIS) in Korea. Korean J Limnol 34(4):349–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim SJ, Steenhuis TS (2001) GRISTORM: grid-based variable source area storm runoff model. Trans ASAE 44(4):863–875

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim SJ, Chae HS, Shin SC (1998) Grid-based KIneMatic Wave STOrm Runoff Model (KIMSTORM), II. Application—applied to Yoncheon Dam watershed. J Korea Water Resour Assoc 30(3):309–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim SJ, Kwon HJ, Jung IK, Park GA (2003) A comparative study on grid-based storm runoff prediction using Thiessen and spatially distributed rainfall. Paddy Water Environ 1(3):149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King KW, Arnold JG, Bingner RL (1999) Comparison of Green-Ampt and curve number methods on Goodwin creek watershed using SWAT. Trans ASAE 42(4):919–925

    Google Scholar 

  • Kojiri T, Tokai A, Kinai Y (1998) Assessment of river basin environment though simulation with water quality and quantity. Annu Disaster Prev Res Inst Kyoto Univ 41(B2):119–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo Q (2007) A distributed surface flow model for watersheds with large water bodies and channel loops. J Hydrol 337:172–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mein RG, Larson CL (1973) Modeling infiltration during a steady rain. Water Resour Res 9(2):384–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models, Part I—a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:283–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden FL (1998) CASC2D version 1.18 user’s manual. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering U-37, University of Connecticut, Storrs

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls WJ, Brakensiek DL, Saxton KE (1982) Estimation of soil water properties. Trans ASAE 25:1316–1320, 1328

    Google Scholar 

  • Refsgaard JC (1997) Parameterisation, calibration and verification of distributed hydrological models. J Hydrol 198:69–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Refsgaard JC, Storm B (1995) MIKE SHE. In: Singh VP (ed) Computer models of watershed hydrology. Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, pp 809–846

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard D (1968) A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-spaced data. In: Proceedings of the 1968 ACM national conference, pp 517–524

  • Sloan PG, Moore ID (1984) Modeling subsurface stormflow on steeply sloping forested watersheds. Water Resour Res 20(12):1815–1822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi J, Kawachi T, Unami K, Maeda S, Izumi T (2009) A distributed hydro-environmental watershed model with three-zoned cell profiling. Paddy Water Environ 7:33–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieux BE (2004) Distributed hydrologic modeling using GIS, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 91–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieux BE, Vieux JE (2002) Vflo TM: a real-time distributed hydrologic model. In: Proceedings of the second federal interagency hydrologic modeling conference, 28 July–1 Aug 2002, Las Vegas

  • Young RA, Onstad CA, Bosch DD, Anderson WP (1989) AGNPS: a nonpoint-source pollution model for evaluating agricultural watersheds. J Soil Water Conserv 44(2):168–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Young RA, Onstad CA, Bosch DD (1995) AGNPS: an agricultural non-point source model. In: Singh VP (ed) Computer models of watershed hydrology. Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, pp 1001–1020

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) Natural Hazard Mitigation Research [Nema-09-NH-05] and the consortium partner, Korea Rural Community Corporation (KRC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seong-Joon Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jung, IK., Park, JY., Park, GA. et al. A grid-based rainfall-runoff model for flood simulation including paddy fields. Paddy Water Environ 9, 275–290 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-010-0232-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-010-0232-4

Keywords

Navigation