Abstract
A grid-based, KIneMatic wave STOrm Runoff Model (KIMSTORM) is described. The model adopts the single flow-path algorithm and routes the water balance during the storm period. Manning’s roughness coefficient adjustment function of the paddy cell was applied to simulate the flood mitigation effect of the paddy fields for the grid-based, distributed rainfall-runoff modeling. The model was tested in 2296 km2 dam watershed in South Korea using six typhoon storm events occurring between 2000 and 2007 with 500 m spatial resolution, and the results were tested through the automatic model evaluation functions in the model. The average values of the Nash–Sutcliffe model efficiency (ME), the volume conservation index (VCI), the relative error of peak runoff rate (EQp), and the absolute error of peak runoff (ETp) were 0.974, 1.016, 0.019, and 0.45 h for calibrated storm events and 0.975, 0.951, 0.029, and 0.50 h for verified storm events, respectively. In the simulation of the flood mitigation effect of the paddy fields, the average values of the percentage changes for peak runoff, total runoff volume, and time to peak runoff were only −1.95, −0.93, and 0.19%, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott MB, Bathurst JC, Cunge JA, O’Connell PE, Rasmussen J (1986a) An introduction to the European Hydrological System—Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, ‘SHE’, 1: history and philosophy of a physically-based, distributed modeling system. J Hydrol 87:45–59
Abbott MB, Bathurst JC, Cunge JA, O’Connell PE, Rasmussen J (1986b) An introduction to the European Hydrological System—Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, ‘SHE’, 2: structure of a physically-based, distributed modeling system. J Hydrol 87:61–77
Beasley DB, Huggins LF, Monke EJ (1980) ANSWERS: a model for watershed planning. Trans ASAE 23(4):938–944
Bell VA, Kay AL, Jones RG, Moore RJ (2007) Development of a high resolution grid-based river flow model for use with regional climate model output. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11:532–549
Beven KJ (1982) On subsurface stormflow: predictions with simple kinematic theory for saturated and unsaturated flows. Water Resour Res 18:1627–1633
Beven KJ (1996) A discussion of distributed modeling, chap 13A. In: Refsgaard JC, Abbott MB (eds) Distributed hydrological modelling. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 255–278
Beven KJ, Kirkby MJ (1979) A physically based variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol Sci Bull 24(1):43–69
Chow VT, Maidment DR, Mays LW (eds) (1988) Applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 20–52
Chung HW, Kim SJ, Choi JY, Kim DS (1995) GIS application model for temporal and spatial simulation of surface runoff from a small watershed. GIS Assoc Korea 3(2):135–146
Downer CW, Ogden FL (2003) Gridded surface subsurface hydrologic analysis user’s manual. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg
Grayson RB, Moore ID, McMahon TA (1992) Physically based hydrological modeling: 1. A terrain-based model for investigative purposes. Water Resour Res 28(10):2639–2658
Grayson RB, Blöschl G, Moore ID (1995) Distributed parameter hydrologic modeling using vector elevation data: THALES and TAPES-C. In: Singh VP (ed) Computer models of watershed hydrology. Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, pp 669–696
Griensven A, Meixner T, Grunwald S, Bishop T, Diluzio M, Srinivasan R (2006) A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models. J Hydrol 324:10–23
Hellweger FL (1997) AGREE-DEM surface reconditioning system. University of Texas. http://www.ce.utexas.edu/prof/maidment/gishydro/ferdi/research/agree/agree.html. Accessed 3 April 2003
Huggins LF, Monke EJ (1968) A mathematical model for simulating the hydrologic response of a watershed. Water Resour Res 4(3):529–539
Jain MK, Kothyari UC, Ranga Raju KG (2004) A GIS based distributed rainfall-runoff model. J Hydrol 299:107–135
Jinkang D, Shunping X, Youpeng X, Chong-yu X, Singh VP (2007) Development and testing of a simple physically-based distributed rainfall-runoff model for storm runoff simulation in humid forested basins. J Hydrol 336:334–346
Julien PY, Saghafian B, Ogden FL (1995) Raster based hydrological modeling of spatially-varied surface runoff. Water Resour Bull AWRA 31(3):523–536
Jung IK, Kim SJ (2003) Comparison of DEM preprocessing method for efficient watershed and stream network extraction. KSCE J Civ Eng 23(3):393–400
Jung IK, Lee MS, Park JY, Kim SJ (2008) A Modified grid-based KIneMatic wave STOrm Runoff Model (ModKIMSTORM), I. Theory and model. KSCE J Civ Eng 28(6):697–707
Kim SJ (1998) Grid-based KIneMatic Wave STOrm Runoff Model (KIMSTORM), I. Theory and model. J Korea Water Resour Assoc 30(3):303–308
Kim SJ (2001) GIS-based water resources management information system (WAMIS) in Korea. Korean J Limnol 34(4):349–356
Kim SJ, Steenhuis TS (2001) GRISTORM: grid-based variable source area storm runoff model. Trans ASAE 44(4):863–875
Kim SJ, Chae HS, Shin SC (1998) Grid-based KIneMatic Wave STOrm Runoff Model (KIMSTORM), II. Application—applied to Yoncheon Dam watershed. J Korea Water Resour Assoc 30(3):309–316
Kim SJ, Kwon HJ, Jung IK, Park GA (2003) A comparative study on grid-based storm runoff prediction using Thiessen and spatially distributed rainfall. Paddy Water Environ 1(3):149–155
King KW, Arnold JG, Bingner RL (1999) Comparison of Green-Ampt and curve number methods on Goodwin creek watershed using SWAT. Trans ASAE 42(4):919–925
Kojiri T, Tokai A, Kinai Y (1998) Assessment of river basin environment though simulation with water quality and quantity. Annu Disaster Prev Res Inst Kyoto Univ 41(B2):119–134
Luo Q (2007) A distributed surface flow model for watersheds with large water bodies and channel loops. J Hydrol 337:172–186
Mein RG, Larson CL (1973) Modeling infiltration during a steady rain. Water Resour Res 9(2):384–394
Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models, Part I—a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:283–290
Ogden FL (1998) CASC2D version 1.18 user’s manual. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering U-37, University of Connecticut, Storrs
Rawls WJ, Brakensiek DL, Saxton KE (1982) Estimation of soil water properties. Trans ASAE 25:1316–1320, 1328
Refsgaard JC (1997) Parameterisation, calibration and verification of distributed hydrological models. J Hydrol 198:69–97
Refsgaard JC, Storm B (1995) MIKE SHE. In: Singh VP (ed) Computer models of watershed hydrology. Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, pp 809–846
Shepard D (1968) A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-spaced data. In: Proceedings of the 1968 ACM national conference, pp 517–524
Sloan PG, Moore ID (1984) Modeling subsurface stormflow on steeply sloping forested watersheds. Water Resour Res 20(12):1815–1822
Takeuchi J, Kawachi T, Unami K, Maeda S, Izumi T (2009) A distributed hydro-environmental watershed model with three-zoned cell profiling. Paddy Water Environ 7:33–43
Vieux BE (2004) Distributed hydrologic modeling using GIS, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 91–128
Vieux BE, Vieux JE (2002) Vflo TM: a real-time distributed hydrologic model. In: Proceedings of the second federal interagency hydrologic modeling conference, 28 July–1 Aug 2002, Las Vegas
Young RA, Onstad CA, Bosch DD, Anderson WP (1989) AGNPS: a nonpoint-source pollution model for evaluating agricultural watersheds. J Soil Water Conserv 44(2):168–173
Young RA, Onstad CA, Bosch DD (1995) AGNPS: an agricultural non-point source model. In: Singh VP (ed) Computer models of watershed hydrology. Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, pp 1001–1020
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) Natural Hazard Mitigation Research [Nema-09-NH-05] and the consortium partner, Korea Rural Community Corporation (KRC).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jung, IK., Park, JY., Park, GA. et al. A grid-based rainfall-runoff model for flood simulation including paddy fields. Paddy Water Environ 9, 275–290 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-010-0232-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-010-0232-4