Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of intensity modulated radiotherapy on the skin dose for deep seated tumors

  • Published:
The Chinese-German Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) on surface doses for brain, abdomen and pelvis deep located tumors treated with 6 MV photon and to evaluate the skin dose calculation accuracy of the XIO 4.04 treatment planning system.

Methods

More investigations for the influences of IMRT on skin doses would increase its applications for many treatment sites. Measuring skin doses in real treatment situations would reduce the uncertainty of skin dose prediction. In this work a pediatric human phantom was covered by a layer of 1 mm bolus at three treatment sites and thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) chips were inserted into the bolus at each treatment site before CT scan. Two different treatment plans [three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) and IMRT] for each treatment sites were performed on XIO 4.04 treatment planning system using superposition algorism.

Results

The results showed that the surface doses for 3DCRT were higher than the surface doses in IMRT by 1.6%, 2.5% and 3.2% for brain, abdomen and pelvis sites respectively. There was good agreement between measured and calculated surface doses, where the calculated surface dose was 15.5% for brain tumor calculated with 3DCRT whereas the measured surface dose was 12.1%. For abdomen site the calculated surface dose for IMRT treatment plan was 16.5% whereas the measured surface dose was 12.6%.

Conclusion

The skin dose in IMRT for deep seated tumors is lower than that in 3DCRT which is another advantage for the IMRT. The TLD readings showed that the difference between the calculated and measured point dose is negligible. The superposition calculation algorism of the XIO 4.04 treatment planning system modeled the superficial dose well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Higgins PD, Han EY, Yuan JL, et al. Evaluation of surface and superficial dose for head and neck treatments using conventional or intensity-modulated techniques. Phys Med Biol, 2007, 52: 1135–1146.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shiau AC, Lai PL, Liang JA, et al. Dosimetric verification of surface and superficial doses for head and neck IMRT with different PTV shrinkage margins. Med Phys, 2011, 38: 1435–1443.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chung H, Jin H, Dempsey JF, et al. Evaluation of surface and buildup region dose for intensity-modulated radiation therapy in head and neck cancer. Med Phys, 2005, 32: 2682–2689.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sankar A, Velmurugan J. Different intensity extension methods and their impact on entrance dose in breast radiotherapy: a study. J Med Phys, 2009, 34: 200–205.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Thomas SJ, Hoole AC. The effect of optimization on surface dose in intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Phys Med Biol, 2004, 49: 4919–4928.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry IAEA Tech. Series No. 381. The use of plane parallel ionization chambers in high energy electron and photon beams. Vienna: IAEA. 1997b.

  7. Bilge H, Ozbek N, Okutan M, et al. Surface dose and build-up region measurements with wedge filters for 6 and 18 MV photon beams. Jpn J Radiol, 2010, 28: 110–116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yadav G, Yadav RS, Kumar A. Skin dose estimation for various beam modifiers and source-to-surface distances for 6 MV photons. J Med Phy, 2009, 34: 87–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. ICRP. Reference man: anatomical, physiological and metabolic characteristics. ICRP Publication 23, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  10. ICRP. Principles for handling emergency and accidental exposures of workers. ICRP Publication 28, 1978. Ann. ICRP 2 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  11. ICRP. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60, 1991. Ann. ICRP 21 (1–3).

    Google Scholar 

  12. ICRP. Principles for limiting exposure of the public to natural sources of radiation. ICRP Publication 39, 1984. Ann. ICRP 14 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yokoyama S, Roberson PL, Litzenberg DW, et al. Surface buildup dose dependence on photon field delivery technique for IMRT. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 2004, 5: 71–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Price S, Williams M, Butson M, et al. Comparison of skin dose between conventional radiotherapy and IMRT. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med, 2006, 29: 272–277.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen FQ, Gupta R, Metcalfe P. Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) surface dose measurements using a PTW advanced Markus chamber. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med, 2010, 33: 23–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ehab M. Attalla.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abou-Elenein, H.S., Attalla, E.M., Ammar, H. et al. The impact of intensity modulated radiotherapy on the skin dose for deep seated tumors. Chin. -Ger. J. Clin. Oncol. 12, 194–198 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10330-012-1127-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10330-012-1127-1

Key words

Navigation