Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamization of retrograde interlocking intramedullary nail for nonunion of distal femoral intercalary allograft reconstruction: a case report and literatures review

  • Published:
The Chinese-German Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Intercalary allograft reconstruction offers a joint-sparing reconstructive option, but nonunion is a devastating complication. In this article, we want to share our experience of proper dynamization of interlocking intramedullary nail for nonunion after proximal femoral intercalary allograft reconstruction. In this report, a 19-year-old girl was diagnosed proximal femoral fibroblast osteosarcoma (Enneking IIb). After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, she underwent proximal femoral intercalary allograft reconstruction fixed by retrograde interlocking intramedullary nail. At her follow-up point of one year postoperatively, nonunion was observed in the proximal host-allograft junction. Therefore she underwent the second surgery of dynamization of the interlocking intramedullary nail. After 12 months’ partial and full weight bearing exercise, bone union occurred. Our early observations show that dynamization of interlocking intramedullary nail can still be a useful means to treat nonunion of hostallograft junction if the local condition of the host and allograft bone are good enough.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Muscolo DL, Ayerza MA, Aponte-Tinao L, et al. Intercalary femur and tibia segmental allografts provide an acceptable alternative in reconstructing tumor resections. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004, (426): 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vander Griend RA. The effect of internal fixation on the healing of large allografts. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1994, 76: 657–663.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang JW, Shih CH. Allograft transplantation in aggressive or malignant bone tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1993, (297): 203–209.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Weiner SD, Scarborough M, Vander Griend RA. Resection arthrodesis of the knee with an intercalary allograft. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1996, 78: 185–192.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kawai A, Muschler GF, Lane JM, et al. Prosthetic knee replacement after resection of a malignant tumor of the distal part of the femur. Medium to long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1998, 80: 636–647.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zeegen EN, Aponte-Tinao LA, Hornicek FJ, et al. Survivorship analysis of 141 modular metallic endoprostheses at early followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004, (420): 239–250.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mankin HJ. The changes in major limb reconstruction as a result of the development of allografts. Chir Organi Mov, 2003, 88: 101–113.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Muscolo DL, Ayerza MA, Aponte-Tinao LA, et al. Partial epiphyseal preservation and intercalary allograft reconstruction in high-grade metaphyseal osteosarcoma of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2004, 86-A: 2686–2693.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mankin HG, Gebhardt MC, Jennings LC, et al. Long-term results of allograft replacement in the management of bone tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1996, (324): 86–97.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Niu XH, Hao L, Zhang Q, et al. Massive allograft replacement in management of bone tumors. Chinese-German J Clin Oncol, 2008, 7: 159–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fuchs B, Ossendorf C, Leerapun T, et al. Intercalary segmental reconstruction after bone tumor resection. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2008, 34: 1271–1276.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Delloye C, Suratwala SJ, Cornu O, et al. Treatment of allograft nonunions with recombinant human bone morphogenetic proteins (rh-BMP). Acta Orthop Belg, 2004, 70: 591–597.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen CF, Chen WM, Cheng YC, et al. Extracorporeally irradiated autograft-prosthetic composite arthroplasty using AML extensively porous-coated stem for proximal femur reconstruction: a clinical analysis of 14 patients. J Surg Oncol, 2009, 100: 418–422.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. DiResta GR, Manoso MW, Naqvi A, et al. Bisphosphonate delivery to tubular bone allografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2008, 466: 1871–1879.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ricci WM, Bellabarba C, Evanoff B, et al. Retrograde versus antegrade nailing of femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma, 2001, 15: 161–169.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Acharya KN, Rao MR. Retrograde nailing for distal third femoral shaft fractures: a prospective study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 2006, 14: 253–258.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Handolin L, Pajarinen J, Lindahl J, et al. Retrograde intramedullary nailing in distal femoral fractures — results in a series of 46 consecutive operations. Injury, 2004, 35: 517–522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller BJ, Virkus WW. Intercalary allograft reconstructions using a compressible intramedullary nail: a preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010, 468: 2507–2513.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tigani D, Moscato E, Sabetta E, et al. Breakage of the Grosse-Kempf nail: causes and remedies. Ital J Orthop Traumatol, 1989, 15: 185–190.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Basumallick MN, Bandopadhyay A. Effect of dynamization in open interlocking nailing of femoral fractures. A prospective randomized comparative study of 50 cases with a 2-year follow-up. Acta Orthop Belg, 2002, 68: 42–48.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Brumback RJ. The rationales of interlocking nailing of the femur, tibia and humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1996, (324): 292–320.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kempf I, Grosse A, Beck G. Closed locked intramedullary nailing. Its application to comminuted fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1985, 67: 709–720.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kempf I, Grosse A, Lafforge D. Combined Kuntscher nailing and screw fixation. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot (French), 1978, 64: 635–651.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Brumback RJ, Uwagie-Ero S, Lakatos RP, et al. Intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. Part II: Fracture-healing with static interlocking fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1988, 70: 1453–1462.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu CC, Chen WJ. Healing of 56 segmental femoral shaft fractures after locked nailing. Poor results of dynamization. Acta Orthop Scand, 1997, 68: 537–540.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Enneking WF, Campanacci DA. Retrieved human allografts: a clinicopathological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2001, 83-A: 971–986.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Dagrenat D, Moncade N, Cordey J, et al. Effects of the dynamization of static bolt nailing. In vivo experimentation. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot, 1988, 74 Suppl 2: 100–104.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gross AE, Hutchison CR. Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision arthroplasty of the hip. Orthop Clin North Am, 1998, 29: 313–317.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chongqi Tu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Min, L., Peng, J., Duan, H. et al. Dynamization of retrograde interlocking intramedullary nail for nonunion of distal femoral intercalary allograft reconstruction: a case report and literatures review. Chin. -Ger. J. Clin. Oncol. 12, 140–143 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10330-012-1121-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10330-012-1121-7

Key words

Navigation