Skip to main content
Log in

Forest stewardship council certificate for a group of planters in Vietnam: SWOT analysis and implications

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Forest Research

Abstract

A group of smallholders in Vietnam has obtained Forest Stewardship Council certification (FSC) for their Acacia plantation forest. Although the certification aims to improve livelihoods via economic, social, and environmental benefits, there are concerns amongst smallholders regarding the outcomes from their certification decision as well as difficulties in maintaining the certification. This article assesses the benefits and challenges of forest management certification from the perspective of small household groups who have achieved FSC certification. The FSC has brought new opportunities for farmers, such as increased selling price and extended trade networks, but is also associated with significant obstacles such as high initial and annual surveillance audit fees, difficult paper work, and complicated procedures for selling wood. Additionally, the small size of the plantations and low expertise in forest management make it more difficult and costly for farmers to achieve certification. There is a heavy dependency on donors for financial and technical support. Because subsidies from organizations like the World Wide Fund for Nature Vietnam are unlikely to continue indefinitely, the benefit of certification for smallholders is uncertain. Feasible actions to increase the sustainability of the group are suggested, including increasing the responsibility of the group members, enhancing the awareness and capacity of the local people, and searching for additional support from other organizations and wood processing companies. From the macro level, a national forest stewardship council should be established so that the audit cost for certification would be reduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Araujo M, Kant S, Couto L (2009) Why Brazilian companies are certifying their forests? For Policy Econ 11:579–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auer MR (2012) Group forest certification for smallholders in Vietnam: an early test and future prospects. Hum Ecol 40:5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray DB, Pérez LM (2002) The rise of community forestry in Mexico: history, concepts, and lessons learned from twenty-five years of community timber production. Report to the Ford foundation, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashore B, Stone M (2012) Can legality verification rescue global forest governance? Analyzing the potential of public and private policy intersection to ameliorate forest challenges in Southeast Asia. For Policy Econ 18:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cubbage F, Diaz D, Yapura P, Dube F (2010) Impacts of forest management certification in Argentina and Chile. For Policy Econ 12:497–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hain H, Ahas R (2007) Can forest certification improve forest management? Case study of the FSC-certified Estonian state forest management centre. Internat Forestry Rev 9:759–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helms MM, Nixon J (2010) Exploring SWOT analysis—where are we now? A review of academic research from the last decade. J Strategy Manag 3:215–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphries SS, Kainer KA (2006) Local perceptions of forest certification for community-based enterprises. For Ecol Manage 235:30–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koller W, Lagan P (2007) Do certified tropical logs fetch a market premium? A comparative price analysis from Sabah, Malaysia. For Policy Econ 9:862–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler P (1988) Marketing management: analysis, planning, implementation, and control. Prentice-Hall International Edition, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen TQ (2007) Trends in forest ownership, forest resources tenure and institutional arrangements: are they contributing to better forest management and poverty reduction? Forestry Policy and Institutions Working Paper 14

  • Nussbaum R, Simula M (2005) The forest certification handbook. Earthscan, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugiura K, Yoshioka T, Inoue K (2012) Effects of acquiring FSC forest management certification for Japanese enterprises using SmartWood Audits. J Forestry Res 23:165–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tacconi L, Obidzinski K, Agung F (2004) Learning lessons to promote forest certification and control illegal logging in Indonesia. CIFOR publishcation, Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

  • Weihrich H (1999) Analysing the competitive advantages and disadvantages of Germany with the TOWS matrix—an alternative to Porter’s model. Eur Bus Rev 99:9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J, Xie D, Wang D, Deng H (2011) Current status and problems in certification of sustainable forest management in China. Environ Manage 48:1086–1094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to anonymous people in Quang Tri province, the staff of the Department of Forestry, and WWF Vietnam for their assistance in our research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hai Thi Nguyen Hoang.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoang, H.T.N., Hoshino, S. & Hashimoto, S. Forest stewardship council certificate for a group of planters in Vietnam: SWOT analysis and implications. J For Res 20, 35–42 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-014-0472-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-014-0472-z

Keywords

Navigation