Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Radiologist Digital Workspace Use and Preference: a Survey-Based Study

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Literature regarding the heterogeneity of and preferences for radiology workstation design—and, in particular, the digital workspace of the radiology workstation—is scant. The purpose of this study was to determine the nature of the digital environments across the specialty and the degree of satisfaction users associated with the particular facets of those environments. A survey was sent to the membership of the Association of University Radiologists in February 2015. The survey comprised 10 questions establishing demographics, current typical workstation setup, perceived satisfaction with that setup, and preferences for potential altered setups. A total of 336 radiologists responded, with a cross-section similar to that described in the 2015 ACR annual workforce survey (1). Although there was a rough split in the number of radiologists using one or two non-diagnostic monitors (46 vs. 51%, respectively), the strong majority (75%) of radiologists use two diagnostic monitors. Users of two non-diagnostic monitors were more likely to keep open the case info (87 vs. 68%) and EMR (84 vs 68%). More senior radiologists tended to find the current setup easy more frequent than younger radiologists, and the latter group was more likely to believe additional monitors would be helpful. Although many radiologists are comfortable with their computing workflows, a significant number indicate dissatisfaction and may be interested in being able to specify the amount of monitor space with which they can work. Additional monitors may promote improved quality in addition to any potential productivity gains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoffmann JC, et al: Combating the health risks of sedentary behavior in the contemporary radiology reading room. AJR Am J Roentgenol 8:W1-W6, 2016

  2. Pollard BJ, et al: The effects of ambient lighting in chest radiology reading rooms. J Digit Imaging 25(4):520-526, 2012

  3. Zwemer J, et al: Effect of ambient sound masking on the accuracy of computerized speech recognition. Radiology 252(3):691-695, 2009

  4. Van Ooijen PM, Koesoema AP, Oudkerk M: User questionnaire to evaluate the radiological workspace. J Digit Imaging 19 Suppl 1:52-59, 2006

  5. Bennett WF, et al: PACS monitors: an evolution of radiologist's viewing techniques. J Digit Imaging 15 Suppl 1:171-174, 2002

  6. Anderson J, Colvin J, Tobler N: Productivity and multi-screen displays. Print, 2007

  7. The 30-inch Apple Cinema HD display productivity benchmark. Pfeiffer Consulting. Print. Pfeiffer Report, 2005

  8. Microsoft Research: Two screens are better than one. Print, 2003

  9. Richtel M: In Data deluge, multitaskers go to multiscreens. The New York Times. A1. Print, 2012

  10. Manjoo F: Discovering two screens aren’t better than one. The New York Times. Print, 2014

  11. Beale R, Edmondson W: Multiple carets, multiple screens and multi-tasking: new behaviours with multiple computers, Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: HCI...but not as we know it, September 03-07, 2007, University of Lancaster, United Kingdom

  12. Ball R, et al: Evaluating the benefits of tiled displays for navigating maps. Human-Comput Interact, 2005.

  13. Sabri A, Ball R, Bhatia S, Fabian A, North C: High-resolution gaming: interfaces, notifications, and the user experience. Interact Comput J 19(2): 151–166, 2007

  14. Bergen L, Grimes T, Potter D: How attention partitions itself during simultaneous message presentations. Hum Commun Res 31:311 (2005)

  15. Greenfield PM: Technology and informal education: what is taught, what is learned. Science 323(5910):69-71, 2009

  16. Foerde K, Knowlton BJ, Poldrack RA: Modulation of competing memory systems by distraction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:11778, 2006

  17. Hembrooke H, Gay G, J. Comput. The laptop and the lecture: the effects of multitasking in learning environments. High Educ 15:46, 2003

  18. Balint BJ, et al: Do telephone call interruptions have an impact on radiology resident diagnostic accuracy? Acad Radiol 21(12):1623-1628,2014

  19. McEnery KW: Radiology information systems and electronic medical records. Reston, American College of Radiology, 2013. Print. IT Reference Guide for The Practicing Radiologist

  20. Bluth EI, et al: The 2015 ACR Commission on Human Resources Workforce Survey. J Am Coll Radiol 12(11):1137-1141,2015

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL, 60521, USA

    Arjun Sharma

  2. University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore VA Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Kenneth Wang & Eliot Siegel

Authors
  1. Arjun Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kenneth Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eliot Siegel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arjun Sharma.

Ethics declarations

Sources of Support

None.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Appendix

Appendix

figure afigure afigure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, A., Wang, K. & Siegel, E. Radiologist Digital Workspace Use and Preference: a Survey-Based Study. J Digit Imaging 30, 687–694 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-017-9971-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-017-9971-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation