Skip to main content
Log in

DICOM Data Warehouse: Part 2

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 2010, the DICOM Data Warehouse (DDW) was launched as a data warehouse for DICOM meta-data. Its chief design goals were to have a flexible database schema that enabled it to index standard patient and study information, modality specific tags (public and private), and create a framework to derive computable information (derived tags) from the former items. Furthermore, it was to map the above information to an internally standard lexicon that enables a non-DICOM savvy programmer to write standard SQL queries and retrieve the equivalent data from a cohort of scanners, regardless of what tag that data element was found in over the changing epochs of DICOM and ensuing migration of elements from private to public tags. After 5 years, the original design has scaled astonishingly well. Very little has changed in the database schema. The knowledge base is now fluent in over 90 device types. Also, additional stored procedures have been written to compute data that is derivable from standard or mapped tags. Finally, an early concern is that the system would not be able to address the variability DICOM-SR objects has been addressed. As of this writing the system is indexing 300 MR, 600 CT, and 2000 other (XA, DR, CR, MG) imaging studies per day. The only remaining issue to be solved is the case for tags that were not prospectively indexed—and indeed, this final challenge may lead to a noSQL, big data, approach in a subsequent version.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Langer SG: A flexible database architecture for mining DICOM objects: the DICOM data warehouse”. JDI 25(2):206–212, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang S, Pavlicek W, Roberts CC, Langer SG, Zhang M, Hu M, Morin RL, Schueler BA, Wellnitz CV, Wu T: An automated DICOM database capable of arbitrary data mining (including radiation dose indicators) for quality monitoring. JDI 24(2):223–33, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  3. Langer SG, Tellis W, Carr C, Daly M, Erickson BJ, Mendelson D, Moore S, Perry J, Shastri K, Warnock M, Zhu W: The RSNA image sharing network. JDI 28(1):53–61, 2015. doi:10.1007/s10278-014-9714-z

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. DDW at https://github.com/sglanger/ddw . last viewed June 2015.

  5. Langer SG: Challenges for data storage in medical imaging research. J Digit Imaging 24(2):203–7, 2011. doi:10.1007/s10278-010-9311-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Rascovsky SJ, Delgado JA, Sanz A, Calvo VD: Castrillón G. Informatics in radiology: use of CouchDB for document-based storage of DICOM objects. Radiographics 32(3):913–27, 2012. doi:10.1148/rg.323115049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steve G. Langer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Langer, S.G. DICOM Data Warehouse: Part 2. J Digit Imaging 29, 309–313 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-015-9830-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-015-9830-4

Keywords

Navigation