Skip to main content
Log in

Towards a More Cloud-Friendly Medical Imaging Applications Architecture: A Modest Proposal

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent information technology literature, in general, and radiology trade journals, in particular, are rife with allusions to the “cloud” suggesting that moving one’s compute and storage assets into someone else’s data center magically solves cost, performance, and elasticity problems. More likely, one is only trading one set of problems for another, including greater latency (aka slower turnaround times) since the image data must now leave the local area network and travel longer paths via encrypted tunnels. To offset this, an imaging system design is needed that reduces the number of high-latency image transmissions, yet can still leverage cloud strengths. This work explores the requirements for such a design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Philbin J, Prior F, Nagy P: Will the next generation of PACS be sitting on the cloud? JDI 24(2):179–183,2011

    Google Scholar 

  2. Langer SG, French T, Segovis C: TCP/IP optimization over wide area networks: implications for teleradiology. J Digit Imaging 24(2):314–321,2011. PMID:20544373. PMCID:3056981. DOI:10.1007/s10278-010-9309-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Hooper FJ, Siddiqui KM, Musk A, Walker L, Chacko A: Multi-institutional analysis of computed and direct radiography part I. Technologist productivity. Radiology 236:413–419,2005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Andriole KP, Morin RL, Arenson RL, Carrino JA, Erickson BJ, Horii SC, Piraino DW, Reiner BI, Siebert JA, Siegel E: Addressing the coming radiology crisis: The society for computer applications in radiology Transforming the Radiological Interpretation Process (TRIP) initiative. JDI 17(4):235–243,2004

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blezek D, Ryan W, Yang X, Langer S, Erickson B, Stevens R, Glowacki R, Rapp W: Image workflow management using the Advanced Medical Imaging Solution. CARS Geneva, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yang X, Blezek DJ, Cheng LT, Ryan WJ, Kallmes DF, Erickson BJ: Computer aided detection of intracranial aneurysms in MR angiography. JDI 24(1):86–95, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  7. IHE Scheduled Workflow, see Figure 3.1-1 at http://ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/IHE_RAD_TF_Rev10-0_Vol1_2011-02-18.pdf. Last viewed August 2012

  8. IHE Transactions http://ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/IHE_RAD_TF_Rev10-0_Vol2_2011-02-18.pdf. Last viewed August 2012

  9. Le TH, Malhi N: Thin client (web browser)-based collaboration for medical imaging and web-enabled data. J Digit Imaging 15(Suppl 1):261–263,2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Endianess http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endianness. Last viewed August 2012

  11. Toland C, Meenan C, Toland M, Safdar N, Vandermeer P, Nagy P: A suggested classification guide for PACS client applications: the five degrees of thickness. J Digit Imaging 19(Suppl 1):78–83,2006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author wishes to express his thanks to Jonathan Swift for the title inspiration.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steve G. Langer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Langer, S.G., Persons, K., Erickson, B.J. et al. Towards a More Cloud-Friendly Medical Imaging Applications Architecture: A Modest Proposal. J Digit Imaging 26, 58–64 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-012-9545-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-012-9545-8

Keywords

Navigation