Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Caries diagnosis using light fluorescence devices in comparison with traditional visual and tactile evaluation: a prospective study in 152 patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Odontology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate the in vivo effectiveness of two fluorescence techniques (DIAGNOdent and VistaProof) and of visual and tactile evaluation in the diagnosis of occlusal caries in permanent teeth. A total of 302 teeth (molars and premolars) from 152 patients were studied. The occlusal surfaces were cleaned using pumice mixed with water, followed by application of the diagnostic methods according to the instructions of the manufacturer, and of the visual and tactile methods according to the recommendations. The true extent of the lesions was determined by fissurotomy. The sensitivity and specificity of visual diagnosis were 79 and 72 %, respectively, versus 53 and 98 % in the case of tactile diagnosis. Teeth with caries lesions exhibited significantly higher DIAGNOdent and VistaProof scores than those without caries. Using the optimum cutoff point of 23.5 obtained in our study for DIAGNOdent, sensitivity and specificity were found to be 92.4 and 92.7 %, respectively, while values of 88.1 and 95.1 % were obtained with a cutoff point of 28.5. Sensitivity in the case of the VistaProof system varied between 92.9 % (cutoff point 1.05) and 85.3 % (cutoff point 1.3), with respective specificity values of 95.8 and 88.6 %. The areas under the curve were 0.756, 0.759, 0.954 and 0.965 for the visual and tactile methods and for DIAGNOdent and VistaProof, respectively. The fluorescence-based techniques showed greater internal and external validity than the visual and tactile methods in diagnosing occlusal caries in permanent teeth. VistaProof is the best method for diagnosing caries in its early stages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carvalho JC, Mestrinho HD. Diagnosing non-cavitated lesions in epidemiological studies: practical and scientific considerations. Braz Oral Res. 2014;28:1–7. doi:10.1590/S1806-83242013005000036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Seremidi K, Lagouvardos P, Kavvadia K. Comparative in vitro validation of VistaProof and DIAGNOdent pen for occlusal caries detection in permanent teeth. Oper Dent. 2012;37:234–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rossete Melo R, Rezende JS, Gomes VE, Ferreira EFE, Oliveira AC. Sociodemographic, biological and behavioural risk factors associated with incidence of dental caries in schoolchildren’s first permanent molars: a 3-year follow-up study. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2013;14:8–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Holmgren C, Gaucher C, Decerle N, Doméjean S. Minimal intervention dentistry II: part 3. Management of non-cavitated (initial) occlusal caries lesions—non-invasive approaches through remineralisation and therapeutic sealants. Br Dent J. 2014;216:237–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Attrill DC, Ashley PF. Occlusal caries detection in primary teeth: a comparison of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods. Br Dent J. 2001;190:440–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Diniz MB, Boldieri T, Rodrigues JA, Santos-Pinto L, Lussi A, Cordeiro RC. The performance of conventional and fluorescence-based methods for occlusal caries detection: an in vivo study with histologic validation. J Am Dent Assoc. 2012;143:339–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Angnes V, Angnes G, Batisttella M, Grande RH, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Clinical effectiveness of laser fluorescence, visual inspection and radiography in the detection of occlusal caries. Caries Res. 2005;39:490–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fung L, Smales R, Ngo H, Moun G. Diagnostic comparison of three groups of examiners using visual and laser fluorescence methods to detect occlusal caries in vitro. Aust Dent J. 2004;49:67–71 (quiz 101).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Achilleos EE, Rahiotis C, Kakaboura A, Vougiouklakis G. Evaluation of a new fluorescence-based device in the detection of incipient occlusal caries lesions. Lasers Med Sci. 2013;28:193–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. König K, Flemming G, Hibst R. Laser-induced autofluorescence spectroscopy of dental caries. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 1998;44:1293–300.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lussi A, Hibst R, Paulus R. DIAGNOdent: an optical method for caries detection. J Dent Res. 2004;83 Spec No C:C80-3.

  12. Rodrigues JA, Hug I, Diniz MB, Lussi A. Performance of fluorescence methods, radiographic examination and ICDAS II on occlusal surfaces in vitro. Caries Res. 2008;42:297–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Iwami Y, Shimizu A, Hayashi M, Takeshige F, Ebisu S. Relationship between colors of carious dentin and laser fluorescence evaluations in caries diagnosis. Dent Mater J. 2006;25:584–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pourhashemi SJ, Jafari A, Motahhari P, Panjnoosh M, Kharrazi Fard MJ, Sanati I, Sahadfar M, Pariab M. An in vitro comparison of visual inspection, bite-wing radiography, and laser fluorescence methods for the diagnosis of occlusal caries. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2009;27:90–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rodrigues JA, Hug I, Neuhaus KW, Lussi A. Light-emitting diode and laser fluorescence-based devices in detecting occlusal caries. J Biomed Opt. 2011;16:107003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jablonski-Momeni A, Rosen SM, Schipper HM, Stoll R, Roggendorf MJ, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, Stachniss V, Pieper K. Impact of measuring multiple or single occlusal lesions on estimates of diagnostic accuracy using fluorescence methods. Lasers Med Sci. 2012;27:343–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Novaes TF, Matos R, Gimenez T, Braga MM, De Benedetto MS, Mendes FM. Performance of fluorescence-based and conventional methods of occlusal caries detection in primary molars—an in vitro study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2012;22:459–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Costa AM, Paula LM, Bezerra AC. Use of Diagnodent for diagnosis of non-cavitated occlusal dentin caries. J Appl Oral Sci. 2008;16:18–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Bader JD, Shugars DA. A systematic review of the performance of a laser fluorescence device for detecting caries. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135:1413–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Apostolopoulou D, Lagouvardos P, Kavvadia K, Papagiannoulis L. Histological validation of a laser fluorescence device for occlusal caries detection in primary molars. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2009;10:11–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Alwas-Danowska HM, Plasschaert AJ, Suliborski S, Verdonschot EH. Reliability and validity issues of laser fluorescence measurements in occlusal caries diagnosis. J Dent. 2002;30:129–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Goel A, Chawla HS, Gauba K, Goyal A. Comparison of validity of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods for detection of occlusal caries in primary molars using the histological gold standard: an in vivo study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2009;27:227–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Souza JF, Boldieri T, Diniz MB, Rodrigues JA, Lussi A, Cordeiro RC. Traditional and novel methods for occlusal caries detection: performance on primary teeth. Lasers Med Sci. 2013;28:287–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pereira AC, Eggertsson H, Martinez-Mier EA, Mialhe FL, Eckert GJ, Zero DT. Validity of caries detection on occlusal surfaces and treatment decisions based on results from multiple caries-detection methods. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009;117:51–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Diniz MB, Lima LM, Eckert G, Zandona AG, Cordeiro RC, Pinto LS. In vitro evaluation of ICDAS and radiographic examination of occlusal surfaces and their association with treatment decisions. Oper Dent. 2011;36:133–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ekstrand KR, Ricketts DN, Kidd EA, Qvist V, Schou S. Detection, diagnosing, monitoring and logical treatment of occlusal caries in relation to lesion activity and severity: an in vivo examination with histological validation. Caries Res. 1998;32:247–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Abalos C, Herrera M, Jiménez-Planas A, Llamas R. Performance of laser fluorescence for detection of occlusal dentinal caries lesions in permanent molars: an in vivo study with total validation of the sample. Caries Res. 2009;43:137–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Anttonen V, Seppä L, Hausen H. Clinical study of the use of the laser fluorescence device DIAGNOdent for detection of occlusal caries in children. Caries Res. 2003;37:17–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lussi A, Imwinkelried S, Pitts N, Longbottom C, Reich E. Performance and reproducibility of a laser fluorescence system for detection of occlusal caries in vitro. Caries Res. 1999;33:261–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jablonski-Momeni A, Ricketts DN, Rolfsen S, Stoll R, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, Stachniss V, Pieper K. Performance of laser fluorescence at tooth surface and histological section. Lasers Med Sci. 2011;26:171–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. ten Bosch JJ, Angmar-Månsson B. Characterization and validation of diagnostic methods. Monogr Oral Sci. 2000;17:174–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ekstrand KR. Improving clinical visual detection–potential for caries clinical trials. J Dent Res. 2004;83:C67–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jablonski-Momeni A, Stachniss V, Ricketts DN, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, Pieper K. Reproducibility and accuracy of the ICDAS-II for detection of occlusal caries in vitro. Caries Res. 2008;42:79–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ekstrand KR, Martignon S, Ricketts DJ, Qvist V. Detection and activity assessment of primary coronal caries lesions: a methodologic study. Oper Dent. 2007;32:225–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Varma S, Banerjee A, Bartlett D. An in vivo investigation of associations between saliva properties, caries prevalence and potential lesion activity in an adult UK population. J Dent. 2008;36:294–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lussi A, Megert B, Longbottom C, Reich E, Francescut P. Clinical performance of a laser fluorescence device for detection of occlusal caries lesions. Eur J Oral Sci. 2001;109:14–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lussi A. Comparison of different methods for the diagnosis of fissure caries without cavitation. Caries Res. 1993;27:409–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Penning C, van Amerongen JP, Seef RE, ten Cate JM. Validity of probing for fissure caries diagnosis. Caries Res. 1992;26:445–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Neuhaus K, Ellwood R, Lussi A, Pitts NB. Traditional lesion detection aids. Monogr Oral Sci. 2009;21:42–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kuhnisch J, Dietz W, Stosser L, Hickel R, Heinrich-Weltzien R. Effects of dental probing on occlusal surfaces—a scanning electron microscopy evaluation. Caries Res. 2007;41:43–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Astvaldsdóttir A, Tranæus S, Karlsson L. Peter Holbrook W. DIAGNOdent measurements of cultures of selected oral bacteria and demineralized enamel. Acta Odontol Scand. 2010;68:148–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Pinelli C. Loffredo Lde C, Serra MC. Effect of drying on the reproducibility of DIAGNOdent to detect caries-like lesions. Braz Dent J. 2010;21:405–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Rechmann P, Charland D, Rechmann BM, Featherstone JD. Performance of laser fluorescence devices and visual examination for the detection of occlusal caries in permanent molars. J Biomed Opt. 2012;17:036006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Francescut P, Zimmerli B, Lussi A. Influence of different storage methods on laser fluorescence values: a two-year study. Caries Res. 2006;40:181–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Jablonski-Momeni A, Schipper HM, Rosen SM, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, Roggendorf MJ, Stoll R, Stachniss V, Pieper K. Performance of a fluorescence camera for detection of occlusal caries in vitro. Odontology. 2011;99:55–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Betrisey E, Rizcalla N, Krejci I, Ardu S. Caries diagnosis using light fluorescence devices: VistaProof and DIAGNOdent. Odontology. 2014;102:330–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ferreira Zandoná A, Santiago E, Eckert G, Fontana M, Ando M, Zero DT. Use of ICDAS combined with quantitative lightinduced fluorescence as a caries detection method. Caries Res. 2010;44:317–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Valencia University Medical and Dental School, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain

    María Melo, Agustín Pascual & Isabel Camps

  2. European University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain

    Ángel del Campo & Javier Ata-Ali

  3. Public Dental Health Service, Arnau de Vilanova Hospital, San Clemente 12, 46015, Valencia, Spain

    Javier Ata-Ali

Authors
  1. María Melo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Agustín Pascual
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Isabel Camps
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ángel del Campo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Javier Ata-Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javier Ata-Ali.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Melo, M., Pascual, A., Camps, I. et al. Caries diagnosis using light fluorescence devices in comparison with traditional visual and tactile evaluation: a prospective study in 152 patients. Odontology 105, 283–290 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-016-0272-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-016-0272-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation