Skip to main content
Log in

Vascular development of the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) inflorescence rachis in response to flower number, plant growth regulators and defoliation

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Plant Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The grapevine inflorescence is a determinate panicle and as buds emerge, shoot, flower and rachis development occur simultaneously. The growth and architecture of the rachis is determined by genetic and environmental factors but here we examined the role of flower and leaf number as well as hormones on its elongation and vascular development. The consequences of rachis morphology and vascular area on berry size and composition were also assessed. One week prior to anthesis, Merlot and Cabernet Sauvignon field vines were exposed to manual flower removal, exogenous plant growth regulators or pre-bloom leaf removal. Manual removal of half the flowers along the vertical axis of the inflorescence resulted in a shorter rachis in both cultivars. Conversely, inflorescences treated with gibberellic acid (GA3) and the synthetic cytokinin, 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) resulted in a longer rachis while pre-bloom removal of all leaves on the inflorescence-bearing shoot did not alter rachis length relative to untreated inflorescences. Across the treatments, the cross-sectional areas of the conducting xylem and phloem in the rachis were positively correlated to rachis girth, flower number at anthesis, bunch berry number, bunch berry fresh mass and bunch sugar content at harvest. Conversely, average berry size and sugar content were not linked to rachis vascular area. These data indicate that the morphological and vascular development of the rachis was more responsive to flower number and plant growth regulators than to leaf removal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agüero C, Riquelme C, Tizio R (1995) Embryo rescue from seedless grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.) treated with growth retardants. Vitis 34:73–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander DM, Woodham RC (1962) Premature bursting of Sultana buds. Nature 194:206–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aloni R (1979) Role of auxin and gibberellin in differentiation of primary phloem fibers. Plant Physiol 63:609–614

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Aloni R (1995) The induction of vascular tissues by auxin and cytokinin. In: Davies PJ (ed) Plant hormones. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 531–546

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aloni R, Tollier MT, Monties B (1990) The role of auxin and gibberellin in controlling lignin formation in primary phloem fibers and in xylem of Coleus blumei stems. Plant Physiol 94:1743–1747

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson DR, Dyer DJ, Cotterman CD, Durley RC (1987) The physiological basis for cytokinin induced increases in pod set in IX93–100 soybeans. Plant Physiol 84:233–239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Caspari HW, Lang A, Alspach P (1998) Effects of girdling and leaf removal on fruit set and vegetative growth in grape. Am J Enol Vitic 49:359–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Dal Santo S, Tornielli GB, Zenoni S, Fasoli M, Farina L, Anesi A, Guzzo F, Delledonne M, Pezzotti M (2013) The plasticity of the grapevine berry transcriptome. Genome Biol 14:54–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dražeta L, Lang A, Cappellini C, Hall AJ, Volz RK, Jameson PE (2004) Vessel differentiation in the pedicel of apple and the effects of auxin transport inhibition. Physiol Plantarum 120:162–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fennell A, Hoover E (1991) Photoperiod influences growth, bud dormancy, and cold acclimation in Vitis labruscana and V. riparia. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 116:270–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M (1997) Chemistry, biochemistry, and dietary role of potato polyphenols. A review. J Agr Food Chem 45:1523–1540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldy RG (1988) Variation in some yield determining components in muscadine grapes and their correlation to yield. Euphytica 39:39–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gourieroux AM, McCully ME, Holzapfel BP, Scollary GR, Rogiers SY (2016) Flowers regulate the growth and vascular development of the inflorescence rachis in Vitis vinifera L. Plant Physiol Bioch 108:519–529

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gouthu S, O’Neil ST, Di Y, Ansarolia M, Megraw M, Deluc LG (2014) A comparative study of ripening among berries of the grape cluster reveals an altered transcriptional programme and enhanced ripening rate in delayed berries. J Exp Bot 65:5889–5902

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hagiwara K, Ryugo K, Olmo HP (1980) Comparison between responsiveness of selected grape clones to gibberellin applications and their endogenous levels in breaking buds and maturing berries. Am J Enol Vitic 31:309–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes PA, Sheumack D, Kibby J, Redmond JW (1991) Amino acid analysis using derivatisation with 9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate and reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr 540:177–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda F, Ishikawa K, Yazawa S, Baba T (2004) Induction of compact clusters with large seedless berries in the grape cultivar ‘Fujimori’ by the use of streptomycin. gibberellins and CPPU. Acta Hortic 640:361–368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iland P, Ewart A, Sitters J, Markides A, Bruer N (eds) (2000) Techniques for chemical analysis and quality monitoring during winemaking. Patrick Iland Wine Productions, Campbelltown

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson DI (1968) Gibberellin and the growth of peach and apricot fruits. Aust J Biol Sci 21:209–216

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson DI, Lombard PB (1993) Environmental and management practices affecting grape composition and wine quality–a review. Am J Enol Vitic 44:409–430

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khursid T, Jackson DI, Rowe RN (1992) Effect of plant growth regulators on flower development in the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Cabernet Sauvignon. New Zeal J Crop Hort 20:351–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang A, Ryan KG (1994) Vascular development and sap flow in apple pedicels. Ann Bot Lond 74:381–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebon G, Brun O, Magné C, Clément C (2005) Photosynthesis of the grapevine (Vitis vinifera) inflorescence. Tree Physiol 25:633–639

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan M (1993) Fruit to flower ratios and trade-offs in size and number. Evol Ecol 7:219–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullins MG (1967) Morphogenetic effects of roots and of some synthetic cytokinins in Vitis vinifera L. J Exp Bot 18:206–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mullins MG (1968) Regulation of inflorescence growth in cuttings of the grape vine (Vitis vinifera L.). J Exp Bot 19:532–543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ollat N, Gaudillere J-P (1998) The effect of limiting leaf area during stage I of berry growth on development and composition of berries of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon. Am J Enol Vitic 49:251–258

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palliotti A, Cartechini A (2001) Developmental changes in gas exchange activity in flowers, berries, and tendrils of field-grown Cabernet Sauvignon. Am J Enol Vitic 52:317–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Peppi MC, Fidelibus MW (2008) Effects of forchlorfenuron and abscisic acid on the quality of ‘flame seedless’ grapes. HortScience 43:173–176

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poni S, Casalini L, Bernizzoni F, Civardi S, Intrieri C (2006) Effects of early defoliation on shoot photosynthesis, yield components, and grape composition. Am J Enol Vitic 57:397–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds AG, Wardle DA, Zurowski C, Looney NE (1992) Phenylureas CPPU and Thidiazuron affect yield components, fruit composition, and storage potential of four seedless grape selections. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 117:85–89

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skoog F, Strong FM, Miller CO (1965) Cytokinins. Science 148:532–533

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snow R (1935) Activation of cambial growth by pure hormones. New Phytol 34:347–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan C, Mullins MG (1981) Physiology of flowering in the grapevine—a review. Am J Enol Vitic 32:47–63

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Theiler R (1974) Einfluss von Blüten und Beeren auf das Wachstum der Traubenstiele, deren Abszession und die Stiellähmeanfälligkeit, Vitis vinifera L. Wein Wiss 29:26–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Theiler R, Coombe BG (1985) Influence of berry growth and growth regulators on the development of grape peduncles in Vitis vinifera L. Vitis 24:1–11

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ursache R, Nieminen K, Helariutta Y (2013) Genetic and hormonal regulation of cambial development. Physiol Plantarum 147:36–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Bel AJE, Hafke JB (2005) Physiochemical determinants of phloem transport. Vascular transport in plants. Elsevier Academy Press, Cambridge, pp 19–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal-Lezama E, Holguin R, Diaz DH, Zepeda M, Hernandez A (2005) Effects of the application of cytokinin bioregulators on inflorescence development of table grapes. X international symposium on plant bioregulators in fruit production, pp 295–298

  • Weaver RJ (1975) Effect of time of application of potassium gibberellate on cluster development of Zinfandel grapes. Vitis 14:97–102

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver RJ, van Overbeek J, Pool RM (1966) Effect of kinins on fruit set and development in Vitis vinifera. Hilgardia 37:181–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Werner T, Motyka V, Strnad M, Schmülling T (2001) Regulation of plant growth by cytokinin. Proc Natl A Sci 98:10487–10492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weyand KM, Schultz HR (2005) Physiological responses of minimal pruning to gibberellic acid. Acta Hortic 689:117–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler AJ (1929) The effect of dormant pruning on the carbohydrate metabolism of Vitis vinifera. Hilgardia 4:153–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by a PhD scholarship to A. Gourieroux from Wine Australia. We would like to express our gratitude to Dr John Gray for helpful discussions during the initial stages of the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suzy Y. Rogiers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gourieroux, A.M., Holzapfel, B.P., McCully, M.E. et al. Vascular development of the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) inflorescence rachis in response to flower number, plant growth regulators and defoliation. J Plant Res 130, 873–883 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-017-0944-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-017-0944-2

Keywords

Navigation