Skip to main content
Log in

An analysis of two variational models for speckle reduction of ultrasound images

  • Published:
Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica, English Series Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we consider two variational models for speckle reduction of ultrasound images. By employing the G-convergence argument we show that the solution of the SO model coincides with the minimizer of the JY model. Furthermore, we incorporate the split Bregman technique to propose a fast alterative algorithm to solve the JY model. Some numerical experiments are presented to illustrate the efficiency of the proposed algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aubert, G., Aujol, J.F. A variational approach to removing multiplicative noise. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 68: 925–946 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bioucas-Dias, J.M. Figueiredo. Multiplicative Noise Removal Using Variable Splitting and Constrained Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 19(7): 1720–1730, (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Darbon, J., Sigelle, M., Tupin, F. A Note on Nice-Levelable MRFs for SAR Image Denoising with Contrast Preservation. Technical Report, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dutt, V., Greenleaf, J. Statistics of the Log-Compression Envelope. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 99(6): 3817–3825 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ekeland, I., Témam, R. Convex Analysis and Variational Problems. SIAM, Philadelphia, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  6. Maso, G.D. An introduction to G-convergence. Birkhäuser, Boston, 1993

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Evans, L.C. Partial differential equations. American Mathematical Society, 1998

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Evans, L.C., Gariepy, R.F. Measure Thoery and Fine Properties of Functions. CRC Press, 1992

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Giusti, F. Minimal Surfaces and Functions of Bounded Variation, Monographs in Math., Vol. 80, Brikhäuser, Basel, 1984

  10. Goldstein, T., Osher, S. The split Bregman method for L1 regularized problems. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 2(2): 323–343 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang, Y., Ng, M., Wen, Y. A new total variation method for multiplicative noise removal. SIAM Journal on Imaging Science, 2(1): 20–40 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Jin, Z.M., Yang, X.P. A Variational Model to Remove the Multiplicative Noise in Ultrasound Images. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 39: 62–74 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaplan, D., Ma, Q. On the statistical characteristics of the log-compressed rayleigh signals: Theorical formulation and experimental results. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 95: 1396–1400 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin, F.H., Yang, X.P. Geometric measure theory-an introduction. Science Press and International Press, Beijing, Boston, 2002

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Loupas, A. Digital image processing for noise reduction in medical ultrasonics. PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh, UK, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rudin, L., Lions, P.L., Osher, S. Multiplicative denoising and deblurring: Theory and algorithms. In: S. Osher and N. Paragios, editors, Geometric Level Sets in Imaging, Vision, and Graphics, Springer-Verlag, 2003, 103–119

  17. Rudin, L., Osher, S., Fatemi, E. Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Physica D, 60: 259–268 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Shi, J., Osher, S. A nonlinear inverse scale space method for a convex multiplicative noise model. SIAM J. Imaging Sciences, 1: 294–321 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Steidl, G., Teuber, T. Removing multiplicative noise by Douglas-Rachford splitting methods. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 36: 168–184 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Thijssen, J.M., Oosterveld, B.J., Wanger, R.F. Gray level transforms and lesion detectabivity in echographic images. Utrason. Imag., 10: 171–195 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tuthill, T.A., Sperry, R.H., Parker, K.J. Deviation from Rayleigh statistics in ultrasonic spekle. Ultrason. Imag., 10: 81–90 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants No. 11671004 and 91330101, and Natural Science Foundation for Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province under Grants No. 15KJB110018 and 14KJB110020.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jin, Zm., Yang, Xp. An analysis of two variational models for speckle reduction of ultrasound images. Acta Math. Appl. Sin. Engl. Ser. 32, 969–982 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10255-016-0618-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10255-016-0618-1

Keywords

2000 MR Subject Classification

Navigation