Skip to main content
Log in

MMSA-1 expression pattern in multiple myeloma and its clinical significance

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical and Experimental Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multiple myeloma-associated antigen-1 (MMSA-1) is a novel multiple myeloma (MM)-associated antigen which has been recently identified. Herein, we have tried to examine its clinical significance by studying the relationship between its expression and selected clinicopathological features. We extracted mononuclear cells from the bone marrow of MM patients and healthy donors and compared the MMSA-1 expression by RT-PCR and Western blot analysis. In addition, we also analyzed MMSA-1 expression in patients that were grouped based on selected clinical parameters. Moreover, the impact of MMSA-1 on patients’ survival was also explored. MMSA-1 mRNA and protein were significantly upregulated in MM patients in comparison with healthy donors. Moreover, among the newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory patients, the MMSA-1 expression was higher in relapsed/refractory patients. In addition, MMSA-1 mRNA expression not only showed significantly higher correlation with clinical parameters such as age, Durie and Salmon stage, bone lesion condition, albumin, creatinine and lactate dehydrogenase but also has a close relationship with myeloma bone disease-related cytokines, genetic abnormalities and treatment response. Multivariate COX analysis predicted MMSA-1 and LDH levels to be independently associated with a poor progression-free survival and overall survival in myeloma patients. Our findings provide initial proof of concept that MMSA-1 is a potent gene that is specifically expressed in MM patients and could be a feasible biomarker and independent prognostic factor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mehta GR, Suhail F, Haddad RY, Zalzaleh G, Lerma EV. Multiple myeloma. Dis Mon. 2014;60(10):483–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brioli A, Melchor L, Walker BA, Davies FE, Morgan GJ. Biology and treatment of myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2014;14(Suppl):S65–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ria R, Reale A, Vacca A. Novel agents and new therapeutic approaches for treatment of multiple myeloma. World J Methodol. 2014;4(2):73–90.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Sant M, Minicozzi P, Mounier M, Anderson LA, Brenner H, Holleczek B, Marcos-Gragera R, Maynadié M, Monnereau A, Osca-Gelis G, Visser O, De Angelis R, EUROCARE-5 Working Group. Survival for haematological malignancies in Europe between 1997 and 2008 by region and age: results of EUROCARE-5, a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(9):931–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. King AJ, Gooding S, Ramasamy K. Managing multiple myeloma in the over 70 s: a review. Maturitas. 2015;80(2):148–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hosen N. Multiple myeloma stem cell. Nihon Rinsho. 2015;73(1):47–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Saltarella I, Lamanuzzi A, Reale A, Vacca A, Ria R. Identify multiple myeloma stem cells: utopia? World J Stem Cells. 2015;7(1):84–95.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Biran N, Ely S, Chari A. Controversies in the assessment of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma: clinical significance of minimal residual disease negativity using highly sensitive techniques. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2014;9(4):368–78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kumar SK, Rajkumar S. The current status of minimal residual disease assessment in myeloma. Leukemia. 2014;28(2):239–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Binsfeld M, Fostier K, Muller J, Baron F, Schots R, Beguin Y, Heusschen R, Caers J. Cellular immunotherapy in multiple myeloma: lessons from preclinical models. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1846(2):392–404.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bae J, Munshi N, Anderson KC. Immunotherapy strategies in multiple myeloma. Hematol Oncol Clin N Am. 2014;28(5):927–43.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kotouček PP, Okubote A. Myeloma stem cell concepts, heterogeneity and plasticity of multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2014;166(3):466–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosenblatt J, Bar-Natan M, Munshi NC, Avigan DE. Immunotherapy for multiple myeloma. Expert Rev Hematol. 2014;7(1):91–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou FL, Zhang W, Chen G, Zhao WH, Cao XM, Chen YX, Tian W, Liu J, Liu SH. Serological identification and bioinformatics analysis of immunogenic antigens in multiple myeloma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2006;55(8):910–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou FL, Zhang W, Chen G, Zhao WH, Cao XM, Chen YX, Tian W, Liu SH, Wu MX, Liu M. Immunological screening for multiple myeloma-associated antigens and their bioinformatics analysis. Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2006;14(2):252–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rajkumar SV. Multiple myeloma: 2014 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. 2014;89(10):999–1009.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson TM. Multiple myeloma treatment and management in the elderly. Consult Pharm. 2014;29(7):434–8, 40–44, 46–51.

  18. Tan D, Chng W, Chou T, Nawarawong W, Hwang SY, Chim CS, Chen W, Durie BG, Lee JH. Management of multiple myeloma in Asia: resource-stratified guidelines. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(12):e571–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen C, Baldassarre F, Kanjeekal S, Herst J, Hicks L, Cheung M. Lenalidomide in multiple myeloma—a practice guideline. Curr Oncol. 2013;20(2):e136–49.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang H, Zhou L, Peng L, Fu W, Zhang C, Hou J. Bortezomib–thalidomide-based regimens improved clinical outcomes without increasing toxicity as induction treatment for untreated multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis of phase III randomized controlled trials. Leuk Res. 2014;38(9):1048–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Paumgartten FJ. Thalidomide and its analogues: comparative clinical efficacy and safety, and cost-effectiveness. Cad Saude Publica. 2014;30(4):684–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cömert M, Güneş A, Sahin F, Saydam G. Quality of life and supportive care in multiple myeloma. Turk J Haematol. 2013;30(3):234–46.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Shibayama H. Supportive care in multiple myeloma for continuing anti-myeloma therapies. Rinsho Ketsueki. 2014;55(10):1999–2004.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fernández de Larrea D, Delforge M, Davies F, Bladé J. Response evaluation and monitoring of multiple myeloma. Expert Rev Hematol. 2014;7(1):33–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ramos TV, Mathew A, Thompson ML, Ehrhardt RO. Standardized cryopreservation of human primary cells. Curr Protoc Cell Biol. 2014;64(A.31):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Liu N, Zhou H, Yang G, Geng C, Jian Y, Guo H, Chen W. Retrospective analysis of genetic abnormalities and survival in 131 patients with multiple myeloma. Oncol Lett. 2015;9(2):930–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hose D, Seckinger A, Jauch A, Rème T, Moreaux J, Bertsch U, Neben K, Klein B, Goldschmidt H. The role of fluorescence in situ hybridization and gene expression profiling in myeloma risk stratification. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2011;139(Suppl 2):84–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Li QW, Chen H, Li ZY, Shen P, Qu LL, Gong LL, Xu HP, Pang L, Si J. Preparation and characterization of anti-GP73 monoclonal antibodies and development of double-antibody sandwich ELISA. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(5):2043–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Meng S, Zhou F, Zhang WG, Cao XM, Wang BY, Wang Y, Bai GG. The research on the expression and localization of multiple myeloma associated antigen MMSA-1. Xi Bao Yu Fen Zi Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2012;28(1):63–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Qian J, Yi Q. DKK1 as a novel target for myeloma immunotherapy. Oncoimmunology. 2012;1(5):756–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Menezes ME, Devine D, Shevde LA, Samant RS. Dickkopf1: a tumor suppressor or metastasis promoter? Int J Cancer. 2012;130(7):1477–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhou F, Meng S, Song H, Claret FX. Dickkopf-1 is a key regulator of myeloma bone disease: opportunities and challenges for therapeutic intervention. Blood Rev. 2013;27(6):261–7. PubMed PMID: 24054128. Pubmed Central PMCID: 4133945.

  33. Rachner TD, Göbel A, Benad-Mehner P, Hofbauer LC, Rauner M. Dickkopf-1 as a mediator and novel target in malignant bone disease. Cancer Lett. 2014;346(2):172–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tarkun P, Atalay F, Atesoglu EB, Mehtap O, Simsek M, Terzi E, Geduk A, Balli F, Batman A, Baydemir C, Hacihanefioglu A. Treatment of patients with multiple myeloma over 65 yr: more tolerability or better response? Eur J Haematol. 2015;94(5):424–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. El Husseiny NM, Kasem N, El Azeeim HA, Mattar MW. Multiple myeloma: a descriptive study of 217 Egyptian patients. Ann Hematol. 2014;93(1):141–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. van de Donk NW, Sonneveld P. Diagnosis and risk stratification in multiple myeloma. Hematol Oncol Clin N Am. 2014;28(5):791–813.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chim CS, Sim J, Tam S, Tse E, Lie AK, Kwong YL. LDH is an adverse prognostic factor independent of ISS in transplant-eligible myeloma patients receiving bortezomib-based induction regimens. Eur J Haematol 2015;94(4):330–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kiba T, Ito T, Nakashima T, Okikawa Y, Kido M, Kimura A, Kameda K, Miyamae F, Tanaka S, Atsumi M, Sumitani Y, Shitakubo Y, Niimi H. Bortezomib and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma: higher AST and LDH levels associated with a worse prognosis on overall survival. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:462.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Basit A, Siddiqui N, Hameed A, Muzaffar N, Athar S. Factors affecting outcome of patients with multiple myeloma. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2014;26(3):376–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hameed A, Brady J, Dowling P, Clynes M, O’Gorman P. Bone disease in multiple myeloma: pathophysiology and management. Cancer Growth Metastasis. 2014;7:33–42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Kyrtsonis MC, Maltezas D, Tzenou T, Koulieris E, Bradwell AR. Staging systems and prognostic factors as a guide to therapeutic decisions in multiple myeloma. Semin Hematol. 2009;46(2):110–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Younes M, Hachfi H, Hammouda F, Younes K, Ben Hammouda S, Jguirim M, Zrour S, Béjia I, Touzi M, Bergaoui N. Survival prognosis factors in multiple myeloma. Tunis Med. 2014;92(6):399–405.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. de Mel S, Lim S, Tung ML, Chng WJ. Implications of heterogeneity in multiple myeloma. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:232546.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Lohr JG, Stojanov P, Carter SL, Cruz-Gordillo P, Lawrence MS, Auclair D, Sougnez C, Knoechel B, Gould J, Saksena G, Cibulskis K, McKenna A, Chapman MA, Straussman R, Levy J, Perkins LM, Keats JJ, Schumacher SE, Rosenberg M, Multiple Myeloma Research Consortium, Getz G, Golub TR. Widespread genetic heterogeneity in multiple myeloma: implications for targeted therapy. Cancer Cell. 2014;25(1):91–101.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Abe M. Cytokines and myeloma bone disease. Clin Calcium. 2014;24(6):871–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Biran N, Jagannath S, Chari A. Risk stratification in multiple myeloma, part 2: the significance of genetic risk factors in the era of currently available therapies. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2013;11(9):578–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Braggio E. Incidence and prognostic value of recurrent chromosomal abnormalities in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. Future Oncol. 2013;9(12):1805–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Oh S, Koo D, Kwon MJ, Kim K, Suh C, Min CK, Yoon SS, Shin HJ, Jo DY, Kwak JY, Kim JS, Sohn SK, Joo YD, Eom HS, Kim SH, Kim YS, Kim C, Mun YC, Kim H, Lee DS, Lee JH, Korean Multiple Myeloma Working Party (KMMWP). Chromosome 13 deletion and hypodiploidy on conventional cytogenetics are robust prognostic factors in Korean multiple myeloma patients: web-based multicenter registry study. Ann Hematol. 2014;93(8):1353–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lai YY, Huang X, Cai Z, Cao XS, Chen FP, Chen XQ, Chen BA, Fang MY, Feng JF, Fu WL, Guo HY, Hou M, Hou J, Hu Y, Hu XT, Hu XM, Huang LQ, Jin J, Li JY, Li J, Li W, Liang YM, Liu T, Liu QF, Liu YH, Mao P, Ouyang J, Qiu LG, Qiu L, Shao CK, Shi B, Song YP, Sun ZM, Wang QS, Wang C, Wang JM, Wang YS, Wang Z, Wu JB, Wu YX, Xia RX, Xue YQ, Yang BZ, Yang G, Yang ZL, Yu L, Yuan Z, Zhang S, Zhang Y, Zhao HG, Zhao L, Zhou DB, Zou SH, Zhu YF. Prognostic power of abnormal cytogenetics for multiple myeloma: a multicenter study in China. Chin Med J (Engl). 2012;125(15):2663–70.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Terpos E, Katodritou E, Roussou M, Pouli A, Michalis E, Delimpasi S, Parcharidou A, Kartasis Z, Zomas A, Symeonidis A, Viniou NA, Anagnostopoulos N, Economopoulos T, Zervas K, Dimopoulos MA, Greek Myeloma Study Group, Greece. High serum lactate dehydrogenase adds prognostic value to the international myeloma staging system even in the era of novel agents. Eur J Haematol. 2010;85(2):114–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Erez A, Shental O, Tchebiner JZ, Laufer-Perl M, Wasserman A, Sella T, Guzner-Gur H. Diagnostic and prognostic value of very high serum lactate dehydrogenase in admitted medical patients. Isr Med Assoc J. 2014;16(7):439–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Augoff K, Hryniewicz-Jankowska A, Tabola R. Lactate dehydrogenase 5: an old friend and a new hope in the war on cancer. Cancer Lett. 2015;358(1):1–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by Grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81172257) and Science and Technology Project of Xi’an Municipality (HM1117(4)) for the research of vaccine in multiple myeloma.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wanggang Zhang or Fuling Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval and Informed consent

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the ethics committees of School of Medicine, Xi’an Jiaotong University. After ethical approval and informed consent, 94 MM patients (n = 70, newly diagnosed and n = 24, relapsed/refractory) were evaluated.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meng, S., Lu, C., Zhang, W. et al. MMSA-1 expression pattern in multiple myeloma and its clinical significance. Clin Exp Med 16, 599–609 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-015-0393-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-015-0393-y

Keywords

Navigation