Skip to main content
Log in

Abandoned Mine Drainage in the Swatara Creek Basin, Southern Anthracite Coalfield, Pennsylvania, USA: 1. Stream Water Quality Trends Coinciding with the Return of Fish

  • Technical Article
  • Published:
Mine Water and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Acidic mine drainage (AMD) from legacy anthracite mines has contaminated Swatara Creek in eastern Pennsylvania. Intermittently collected base-flow data for 1959–1986 indicate that fish were absent immediately downstream from the mined area where pH ranged from 3.5 to 7.2 and concentrations of sulfate, dissolved iron, and dissolved aluminum were as high as 250, 2.0, and 4.7 mg/L, respectively. However, in the 1990s, fish returned to upper Swatara Creek, coinciding with the implementation of AMD treatment (limestone drains, limestone diversion wells, limestone sand, constructed wetlands) in the watershed. During 1996–2006, as many as 25 species of fish were identified in the reach downstream from the mined area, with base-flow pH from 5.8 to 7.6 and concentrations of sulfate, dissolved iron, and dissolved aluminum as high as 120, 1.2, and 0.43 mg/L, respectively. Several of the fish taxa are intolerant of pollution and low pH, such as river chub (Nocomis micropogon) and longnose dace (Rhinichthys cataractae). Cold-water species such as brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and warm-water species such as rock bass (Ambloplites rupestris) varied in predominance depending on stream flow and stream temperature. Storm flow data for 1996–2007 indicated pH, alkalinity, and sulfate concentrations decreased as the stream flow and associated storm-runoff component increased, whereas iron and other metal concentrations were poorly correlated with stream flow because of hysteresis effects (greater metal concentrations during rising stage than falling stage). Prior to 1999, pH < 5.0 was recorded during several storm events; however, since the implementation of AMD treatments, pH has been maintained near neutral. Flow-adjusted trends for 1997–2006 indicated significant increases in calcium; decreases in hydrogen ion, dissolved aluminum, dissolved and total manganese, and total iron; and no change in sulfate or dissolved iron in Swatara Creek immediately downstream from the mined area. The increased pH and calcium from limestone in treatment systems can be important for mitigating toxic effects of dissolved metals. Thus, treatment of AMD during the 1990s improved pH buffering, reduced metals transport, and helped to decrease metals toxicity to fish.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Public Health Association (1998a) Alkalinity (2320)/Titration method. In: Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, Eaton AD (eds) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, pp 2.26–2.30

  • American Public Health Association (1998b) Acidity (2310)/Titration method. In: Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, Eaton AD (eds) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, pp 2.24–2.26

  • Baker JP, Schofield CL (1982) Aluminum toxicity to fish in acidic waters. Water Air Soil Poll 18:289–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balistrieri LS, Blank RG (2008) Dissolved and labile concentrations of Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn in the South Fork Coeur d’Alene River, Idaho—comparisons among chemical equilibrium models and implications for biotic ligand models. Appl Geochem 23:3355–3371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbour MT, Gerritsen J, Snyder BD, Stribling JB (1999) Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers–periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish. 2nd edn, US EPA 841-B-99-002, www.epa.gov/OWOW/monitoring/techmon.html

  • Berg TM, Barnes JH, Severn WD, Skema VK, Wilshusen JP, Yannaci DS (1989) Physiographic provinces of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Geol Surv Map 13, scale 1:2,000,000, Harrisburg, PA, USA

  • Bigham JM, Nordstrom DK (2000) Iron and aluminum hydroxysulfate minerals from acid sulfate waters. In: Jambor JL, Alpers CN, Nordstrom DK (eds) Sulfate minerals, crystallography, geochemistry and environmental significance, Mineralogical Soc of America Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry 40: 351–403

  • Blowes DW, Ptacek CJ, Jambor JL, Weisener CG (2003) The geochemistry of acid mine drainage. In: Lollar BS (ed) Environmental geochemistry. Elsevier, Treatise on Geochemistry, Holland HD, Turekian KK (eds) vol 9, Elsevier-Pergamon, Oxford, UK, pp 149–204

  • Bowes MJ, House WA, Hodgkinson RA, Leach DV (2005) Phosphorus-discharge hysteresis during storm events along a river catchment: the River Swale, UK. Water Res 39:751–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broshears RE, Runkel RL, Kimball BA, McKnight DM, Bencala KE (1996) Reactive solute transport in an acidic stream—experimental pH increase and simulation of controls on pH, aluminum, and iron. Environ Sci Technol 30:3016–3024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler RL, Cooper EL, Crawford JK, Hales DC, Kimmel WG, Wagner CC (1973) Fish and food organisms in acid mine waters of Pennsylvania. US EPA-R3-73-032, p 158

  • Cannon WE, Kimmel WG (1992) A comparison of fish and macroinvertebrate communities between an unpolluted stream and the recovery zone of a stream receiving acid mine drainage. J PA Acad Sci 66:58–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Caruso BS (2005) Simulation of metals total maximum daily loads and remediation in a mining-impacted stream. J Environ Eng 131:777–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland L, Buckler DR, Brumbaugh WG (1991) Residue dynamics and effects of aluminum on growth and mortality in brook trout. Environ Toxicol Chem 10:243–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn TA, DeLong LL, Gilroy EJ, Hirsch RM, Wells RM (1989) Estimating constituent loads. Water Resour Res 25:937–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (2002) Chapter 93. Water quality standards. Pennsylvania Code, Title 25. Environmental Protection. Harrisburg, PA. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, pp 93.1–93.226

  • Corbett ES, Lynch JA (1982) Rapid fluctuations in stream flow pH and associated water-quality parameters during a storm flow event. Proceedings of international symposium on hydrometeorology, American Water Resources Association, pp 461–464

  • Courtney LA, Clements WH (2002) Assessing the influence of water and substratum quality on benthic macroinvertebrate communities in a metal-polluted stream—an experimental approach. Freshw Biol 47:1766–1778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cravotta CA III (2000) Relations among sulfate, metals, sediment, and stream flow data for a stream draining a coal-mined watershed in east-central Pennsylvania. Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Acid Rock Drainage (ICARD). Littleton, CO, USA, Soc for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc., vol 1, pp 401–410

  • Cravotta CA III (2005) Effects of abandoned coal-mine drainage on stream flow and water quality in the Mahanoy Creek Basin, Schuylkill, Columbia, and Northumberland Counties, Pennsylvania, 2001. US Geol Surv Scientif Investigat Rept 2004–5291, p 60

  • Cravotta CA III (2008) Dissolved metals and associated constituents in abandoned coal-mine discharges, Pennsylvania, USA: 2. Geochemical controls on constituent concentrations. Appl Geochem 23:203–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cravotta CA III (2010) Abandoned mine drainage in the Swatara Creek Basin, Southern Anthracite Coalfield, Pennsylvania, USA: 2. Performance of passive-treatment systems. Mine Water Environ (this volume)

  • Cravotta CA III, Bilger MD (2001) Water-quality trends for a stream draining the Southern Anthracite Field, Pennsylvania. Geochem Explor Environ Anal 1:33–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Cravotta CA III, Kirby CS (2004) Effects of abandoned coal-mine drainage on stream flow and water quality in the Shamokin Creek Basin, Northumberland and Columbia Counties, Pennsylvania, 1999–2001. US Geol Surv Water-Resour Inv Rep 03-4311, p 58

  • Di Toro DM, Allen HE, Bergman HL, Meyer JS, Paquin PR, Santore RC (2001) A biotic ligand model of the acute toxicity of metals. I. Technical basis. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:2383–2396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dsa JV, Johnson KS, Lopez D, Kanuckel C, Tumulinson J (2008) Residual toxicity of acid mine drainage- contaminated sediment to stream macroinvertebrates—relative contribution of acidity vs. metals. Water Air Soil Pollut 194:185–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggleston JR, Kehn TM, Wood GH Jr (1999) Anthracite. In: Schultz CH (ed) The geology of Pennsylvania. PA Geological Survey. 4th series, Special Publ 1, pp 458–469

  • Fishel DK (1988) Preimpoundment hydrologic conditions in the Swatara Creek (1981–1984) and estimated postimpoundment water quality in and downstream from the planned Swatara State Park reservoir, Lebanon and Schuylkill Counties, PA. US Geol Surv Water-Resour Inv Rept 88-4087, p 108

  • Francis AJ, Dodge DJ (1990) Anaerobic microbial remobilization of toxic metals coprecipitated with iron oxide. Environ Sci Technol 24:373–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis AJ, Dodge DJ, Rose AW, Ramirez AJ (1989) Aerobic and anaerobic microbial dissolution of toxic metals from coal wastes—mechanism of action. Env Sci Technol 23:435–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gammons CH, Milodragovich L, Belanger-Woods J (2007) Influence of diurnal cycles on monitoring of metal concentrations and loads in streams draining abandoned mine lands: an example from High Ore Creek, Montana. Environ Geol 53:611–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gannett Fleming Corddry and Carpenter, Inc. (1972) Swatara Creek mine drainage abatement project, part 1, Operation Scarlift: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania SL-126-1, p 57

  • Growitz DJ, Reed LA, Beard MM (1985) Reconnaissance of mine drainage in the coal fields of eastern Pennsylvanian. US Geol Surv Water-Resour Inv Rept 83-4274, p 54

  • Havas M, Rosseland BO (1995) Response of zooplankton, benthos, and fish to acidification—an overview. Water Air Soil Pollut 85:51–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helsel DR, Hirsch RM (2002) Statistical methods in water resources. US Geol Surv Techniques of Water- Resources Investigations 04-A3, p 523

  • Henry TB, Irwin ER, Grizzle JM, Wildhaber ML, Brumbaugh WG (1999) Acute toxicity of an acid mine drainage mixing zone to juvenile bluegill and largemouth bass. T Am Fish Soc 128:919–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herlihy AT, Kaufmann PR, Mitch ME, Brown DD (1990) Regional estimates of acid mine drainage impact on streams in the mid-Atlantic and southeastern United States. Water Air Soil Pollut 50:91–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herricks EE (1977) Recovery of streams from chronic pollutional stress—acid mine drainage. In: Cairns J Jr, Dickson KL, Herricks EE (eds) Recovery and restoration of damaged ecosystems. Univ Press of Virginia, Charlottesville, pp 43–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson LR (1987) Swatara Creek, subbasin 07, subsubasin D (river miles 58.25 to 4.6). Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission Stream Survey Report, July 15, 1987

  • Johnson DB, Hallberg KB (2005) Acid mine drainage remediation options: a review. Sci Total Environ 338:3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby CS, Cravotta CA III (2005) Net alkalinity and net acidity 2: practical considerations. Appl Geochem 20:1941–1964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langland MJ, Raffensperger JP, Moyer DL, Landwehr JM, Schwarz GE (2006) Changes in stream flow and water quality in selected nontidal basins in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, 1985–2004. US Geol Surv Scientif Investigat Rept 2006-5178, p 75

  • MacDonald DD, Ingersoll CG, Berger TA (2000) Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Arch Environ Con Tox 39:20–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mager EM, Brix KV, Grosell M (2010) Influence of bicarbonate and humic acid on effects of chronic waterborne lead exposure to the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Aquatic Toxicol 96:135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarren EF, Wark JW, George JR (1964) Water quality of the Swatara Creek Basin. US Geol Surv Open-File Rept, Pa, p 88

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteith DT, Hildrew AG, Flower RJ, Raven PJ, Beaumont WRB, Collen P, Kreiser AM, Shilland EM, Winterbottom JH (2005) Biological responses to the chemical recovery of acidified fresh waters in the UK. Environ Pollut 137:83–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson SM, Roline RR (1996) Recovery of a stream macroinvertebrate community from mine drainage disturbance. Hydrobiologia 339:73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordstrom DK (2000) Advances in the hydrochemistry and microbiology of acid mine waters. Int Geol Rev 42:499–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olyphant GA, Bayless ER, Harper D (1991) Seasonal and weather-related controls on solute concentrations and acid drainage from a pyritic coal-refuse deposit in southwestern Indiana, USA. J Contam Hydrol 7:219–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paquin PR, Santore RC, Wu KB, Kavvadas CD, Di Toro DM (2000) The biotic ligand model—a model of the acute toxicity of metals to aquatic life. Environ Sci Policy 3:S175–S182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennsylvania Dept of Environmental Protection (2004) Watershed restoration action strategy (WRAS), State water plan subbasin 07D Swatara Creek watershed, Dauphin, Lebanon, Berks, and Schuylkill Counties. PA Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), Bureau of Watershed Mgmt, Harrisburg, PA, p 47, http://www.depweb.state.pa.us/watershedmgmt/lib/watershedmgmt/nonpoint_source/wras/wras-07d.pdf

  • Pennsylvania Dept of Environmental Protection (2007) 2006 Pennsylvania integrated water quality monitoring and assessment report–clean water act section 305(b) report and 303(d) list. PA DEP, Bureau of Watershed Mgmt, Harrisburg, PA, USA, p 55, http://www.depweb.state.pa.us/watersupply/lib/watersupply/MasterNarrative.pdf

  • Pennsylvania Dept of Environmental Protection (2009) Recreational use loss estimates for PA streams degraded by AMD 2006. Bureau of Abandoned Mine Reclamation acid mine drainage set-aside program–program implementation guidelines, PA DEP Bureau of Abandoned Mine Reclamation, Harrisburg, PA, USA, p C1-C14, http://www.depweb.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt/community/abandoned_mine_reclamation/13961

  • Raymond PA, Oh N-H (2009) Long-term changes of chemical weathering in rivers heavily impacted from acid mine drainage: insights on the impact of coal mining on regional and global carbon and sulfur budgets. Earth Planet Sci Lett 284:50–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge AT (1998) Computer programs for describing the recession of ground-water discharge and for estimating mean ground-water recharge and discharge from stream flow data—update. US Geol Surv Water-Resour Inv Rept 98-4148, p 43

  • Schemel LE, Kimball BA, Bencala KE (2000) Colloid formation and metal transport through two mixing zones affected by acid mine drainage near Silverton, Colorado. Appl Geochem 15:1003–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker ME (1932) Swatara Creek, Schuylkill County. Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission Stream Survey Report, Harrisburg

  • Short TM, Black JA, Birge WJ (1990) Effects of acid-mine drainage on the chemical and biological character of an alkaline headwater stream. Arch Environ Con Tox 19:241–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snucins E, Gunn JM (2003) Use of rehabilitation experiments to understand the recovery dynamics of acid-stressed fish populations. Ambio 32:240–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner L (2000) Pennsylvania fishes. Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission, Harrisburg, 170 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart WT, Schneider WJ, Crooks JW (1967) Swatara Creek Basin of southeastern Pennsylvania—an evaluation of its hydrologic system. USGS Water-Supply Paper 1829, p 79

  • U.S. EPA (2002) National recommended water quality criteria–2002. US Environmental Protection Agency 822-R-02-047, p 33

  • U.S. EPA (2007) Section 319 nonpoint source success stories—Pennsylvania: Swatara Creek. US Environmental Protection Agency 841-F-07-001P, p 2, http://www.epa.gov/owow/nps/Success319/state/pdf/pa_swatara.pdf

  • USGS (variously dated) USGS annual hydrologic data reports of Pennsylvania–Swatara Creek Basin and Swatara Creek project. US Geological Survey PA Water Science Center, http://pa.water.usgs.gov/ar/index.html

  • Vannote RL, Minshall GW, Cummins KW, Sedell JR, Cushing CE (1980) The river continuum concept. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 37:130–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrba J, Kopacek J, Fott J, Kohout L, Nedbalova L, Prazakova M, Soldan T, Schaumburg J (2003) Long- term studies (1871–2000) on acidification and recovery of lakes in the Bohemian Forest (central Europe). Sci Total Environ 310:73–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster JG, Swedlund PJ, Webster KS (1998) Trace metal adsorption onto an acid mine drainage iron(III) oxy hydroxy sulfate. Environ Sci Tech 32:1361–1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winland RL, Traina SJ, Bigham JM (1991) Chemical composition of ochreous precipitates from Ohio coal mine drainage. J Environ Qual 20:452–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolkersdorfer C, Bowell RJ (eds) (2004) Contemporary reviews of mine water studies in Europe, part 1. Mine Water Environ 23: 162–182

  • Wood CR (1996) Water quality of large discharges from mines in the anthracite region of eastern Pennsylvania. USGS Water-Resour Inv Rept 95-4243, p 69

  • Wood GH Jr, Kehn TM, Eggleston JR (1986) Deposition and structural history of the Pennsylvania Anthracite region. In: Lyons, PC, Rice, CL (eds) Paleoenvironmental and Tectonic Controls in Coal-forming Basins of the United States. Geol Soc America Special Paper 210: 31–47

  • Yan ND, Leung B, Keller W, Arnott SE, Gunn JM, Raddum GG (2003) Developing conceptual frameworks for the recovery of aquatic biota from acidification. Ambio 32:165–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziemkiewicz PF, Skousen JG, Simmons J (2003) Long-term performance of passive acid mine drainage treatment systems. Mine Water Environ 22:118–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the PaDEP and the Schuylkill Conservation District with funding through the US EPA Non-point Point Source National Monitoring Program, the US DOE, and the USGS Cooperative Water-Resources Program. The first author is grateful to Roger J. Hornberger and Daniel J. Koury of PaDEP for their sustained support. Jeffrey J. Chaplin, Emily Eggler, Heather Eggleston, Katherine Tuers Brayton, Suzanne J. Ward, Jeffrey B. Weitzel, Kovaldas “KB” Balciauskas, Michael D. Bilger, and John Rote, presently or formerly at USGS, are acknowledged for critical assistance with field work and data processing. Although many individuals assisted during annual fish surveys, Robert Schott of PaDEP warrants special thanks for providing vital expertise and equipment for fish capture and identification during several years of the study. The authors also wish to acknowledge constructive reviews of the manuscript by Kevin J. Breen and Robert Runkel of USGS, John Arway of the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission, Christopher H. Gammons of Montana Tech, and an anonymous reviewer. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles A. Cravotta III.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cravotta III, C.A., Brightbill, R.A. & Langland, M.J. Abandoned Mine Drainage in the Swatara Creek Basin, Southern Anthracite Coalfield, Pennsylvania, USA: 1. Stream Water Quality Trends Coinciding with the Return of Fish. Mine Water Environ 29, 176–199 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-010-0112-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-010-0112-6

Keywords

Navigation