Skip to main content
Log in

Exploration of individual study paths of successful first-year students: an interview study

  • Published:
European Journal of Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to explore the individual profiles of successful, rapidly progressing first-year university students. The participants numbered 38 humanities and law students, who volunteered to be interviewed. The interview data were analysed using abductive content analysis. Two student profiles were distinguished: strenuously progressing students, who were interested and motivated but had to work hard to meet their deadlines and maintain a rapid study pace (applying a defensive pessimism cognitive strategy), and effortlessly progressing students, who had very good self-regulation skills, strong self-efficacy for self-regulation and the most positive experiences of their learning environment. These students applied a deep approach to learning and an optimistic cognitive strategy. The results highlight the complex interplay between motivational and volitional factors, the approaches to learning and the cognitive attributional strategies affecting individual study paths.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, E., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2007). Academic procrastination and the role of hope as a coping strategy. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1301–1310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amirali, M., Huon, G., & Kevin, B. (2004). Approaches to studying and academic performance in short-essay exams. Higher Education, 47, 161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asikainen, H., Parpala, A., Virtanen, V., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2013). The relationship between student learning process, study success and the nature of assessment. A qualitative study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39, 211–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (1979). Individual differences in study processes and the quality of learning outcomes. Higher Education, 8, 381–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bound, J., Lovenheim, M., & Turner, S. (2007). Understanding the decrease in college completion rates and the increased time to the baccalaureate degree. Population Studies Center Research Report, 2007, 07–626.

  • Brunello, G., & WInter-Ebmer, R. (2003). Why do students expect to stay longer in college? Evidence from Europe. Economics Letters, 80, 247–253.

  • Cantor, N., & Norem, J. (1989). Defensive pessimism and stress and coping. Social Cognition, 7, 92–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, P. Y., & Chiou, W.-B. (2010). Achievement, attributions, self-efficacy, and goal setting by accounting undergraduates. Psychological Reports, 106(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewitte, S., & Lens, W. (2000). Exploring volitional problems in academic procrastinators. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 733–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duff, A. (2004). Understanding academic performance and progression of first-year accounting and business economics graduates: the role of approaches to learning and prior academic achievement. Accounting Education, 13, 409–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J. (2009). Teaching for understanding at university: deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual base of study strategies inventories in higher education. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 325–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (2013). The disposition to understand for oneself at university. Integrating learning processes with motivation and metacognition. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 267–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eronen, S., Nurmi, J.-E., & Salmela-Aro, K. (1998). Optimistic, defensive-pessimistic, impulsive and self-handicapping strategies in university environments. Learning and Instruction, 8(2), 159–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gale, T., & Parker, S. (2014). Navigating change: a typology of student transitions in Australian higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 39(5), 734–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heikkilä, A., & Lonka, K. (2006). Studying in higher education: students’ approaches to learning, self-regulation, and cognitive strategies. Studies in Higher Education, 31(1), 99–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heikkilä, A., Lonka, K., Nieminen, J., & Niemivirta, M. (2012). Relations between teacher students’ approaches to learning, cognitive and attributional strategies, well-being, and study success. Higher Education, 64, 455–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E., & Berglas, S. (1978). Control of attributions about the self through self-handicapping strategies: the appeal of alcohol and the role of underachievement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4(2), 200–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, M., Krawchuk, L., & Rajani, S. (2008). Academic procrastination of undergraduates: low self-efficacy to self-regulate predicts higher levels of procrastination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 915–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klingsieck, K. (2013). Procrastination. When good things don’t come to those who wait. European Psychologist, 18(1), 24–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kota Database (2004). A statistical database maintained by the Finnish Ministry of Education containing data on universities. http://e.finland.fi/netcomm/news/showarticle821b.html?intNWSAID=1975.

  • Krapp, A. (2005). Basic needs and the development of interest and intrinsic motivational orientations. Learning and Instruction, 15, 381–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12, 383–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J., Bridges, B., & Hayek, J. (2006). What matters to student success: a review of the literature. Commissioned report for the national symposium on postsecondary student success: spearheading a dialog on student success. NPEC (National Postsecondary Education Cooperative), July 2006.

  • Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2004). Raising students’ awareness of their approaches to study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(4), 405–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Lonka, K. (1999). Individual ways of interacting with the learning environment—are they related to study success? Learning and Instruction, 9, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Saariaho, E., Inkinen, M., Haarala-Muhonen, A., & Hailikari, T. (2015). Academic procrastinators, strategic delayers and something betwixt and between: an interview study. Frontline Learning Research, 3(2), 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A., Marsh, H., & Debus, R. (2003). Self-handicapping and defensive pessimism: a model of self-protection from a longitudinal perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1997). Approaches to learning. In: F. Marton, D. Hounsell & N. Entwistle (Eds.) The experience of learning. Implications for teaching and studying in higher education (2nd ed., pp. 39–59). Edinburg: Scottish Academic Press.

  • Mikkonen, J., Heikkilä, A., Ruohoniemi, M., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2009). "I study because I’m interested" university students’ explanations for their educational choices. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(3), 229–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijen, C., Jones, M., McCarthy, P., Sheffield, D., & Allen, M. (2013). Cognitive and affective components of challenge and threat states. Journal of Sports Sciences, 31(8), 847–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikkonen, J., & Ruohoniemi, M. (2011). How do veterinary students’ motivation and study practices related to academic success? Journal of Veterinary Education, 38, 298–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norem, J., & Cantor, N. (1986). Defensive pessimism: harnessing anxiety as motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1208–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nurmi, J.-E., Aunola, K., Salmela-Aro, K., & Lindroos, M. (2003). The role of success expectation and task-avoidance in academic performance and satisfaction: three studies on antecedents, consequences and correlates. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 59–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parpala, A., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Komulainen, E., Litmanen, T., & Hirsto, L. (2010). Students’ approaches to learning and their experiences of the teaching-learning environment in different disciplines. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 269–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postareff, L., Mattsson, M., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Hailikari, T. (2016). Complex relationship between emotions, approaches to learning, study success and study progress during the transition to university. Higher Education, in press.

  • Román, S., Cuestas, P., & Fenollar, P. (2008). An examination of the interrelationships between self-esteem, others’ expectations, family support, learning approaches and academic achievement. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothblum, E., Solomon, L., & Murakami, J. (1986). Affective, cognitive and behavioural differences between high and low procrastinators. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 33(4), 387–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rytkönen, H., Parpala, A., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Postareff, L. (2012). Factors influencing bioscience students’ academic achievement. Instructional Science, 40, 241–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segers, M., Dochy, F., & Cascallar, E. (Eds.). (2003). Optimising new modes of assessment: in search of qualities and standards. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2005). Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: a review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 325–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L., & Hovdhaugen, E. (2014). Complexities and challenges of researching student completion and non-completion of HE programmes in Europe: a comparative analysis between England and Norway. European Journal of Education, 49(4), 457–470.

  • Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: from grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., Ellis, R. A., & Han, F. (2012). Relations between students’ approaches to learning, experienced emotions and outcomes of learning. Studies in Higher Education, 37, 811–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J. D. (2005). Relations between student learning patterns and personal and contextual factors and academic performance. Higher Education, 49, 205–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sari Lindblom-Ylänne.

Additional information

Sari Lindblom-Ylänne, Centre for Research and Development of Higher Education, University of Helsinki

P.O. Box 9, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland, sari.lindblom@helsinki.fi, www.helsinki.fi/yty/

Current themes of research:

Student learning at university. Academic emotions. Procrastination. Approaches to learning. Motivation and self-efficacy beliefs. Regulation of learning.

Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:

1. Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Saariaho, E., Inkinen, M., Haarala-Muhonen, A. & Hailikari, T. (2015) Academic procrastinators, strategic delayers and something betwixt and between: an interview study. Frontline Learning Research, 3(2), 27–42.

2. Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Parpala, A. & Postareff, L. (2013). Challenges in analysing change in students’ approaches to learning. In: D. Gjjbels, V. Donche, J. Richardson, & J. Vermunt (Eds), Learning patterns in higher education: dimensions and research perspective. New York, US: Routledge (Book series New Perspectives on Learning and Instruction), pp. 232–248.

3. Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Parpala, A., & Postareff, L. (2015). Methodological challenges in measuring change in students’ learning processes. In: L. Hill & F. Levine (Eds.). World Education Research Yearbook 2015. Routledge, pp. 160–180.

Anne Haarala-Muhonen, Faculty of Law, University of Helsinki

P.O. Box 4, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland, anne.haarala-muhonen@helsinki.fi

Current themes of research:

Student learning at university. Procrastination. Approaches to learning. Motivation and self-efficacy beliefs. Regulation of learning.

Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:

4. Haarala-Muhonen, A., Ruohoniemi, M., Katajavuori, N. & Lindblom-Ylänne S. (2011). Comparison of students’ perceptions of their teaching-learning environments in three professional academic disciplines—a valuable tool for quality enhancement. Learning Environments Research, 14(2), 155–169.

5. Haarala-Muhonen, A., Ruohoniemi, M. & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2011) Factors affecting the study pace of first-year law students—in search of study counselling tools. Studies in Higher Education, 36(8), 911–922.

6. Haarala-Muhonen, A., Lindblom-Ylänne, S. & Ruohoniemi, M. (2013). Successful law students as models for beginner students? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50(3), 261–271.

Liisa Postareff, Centre for Research and Development of Higher Education, University of Helsinki

P.O. Box 9, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland, sari.lindblom@helsinki.fi, www.helsinki.fi/yty/

Current themes of research:

Student learning at university. Academic emotions. Procrastination. Approaches to learning. Motivation and self-efficacy beliefs. Regulation of learning.

Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:

1. Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Parpala, A. (2014). Explaining university students’ strong commitment to understand through individual and contextual elements. Frontline Learning Research 3, 31–49.

2. Postareff, L., Parpala, A., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2015). Factors contributing to changes in a deep approach to learning in different learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 18, 313–333.

3. Postareff, L. & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2008). Variation in teachers’ descriptions of their teaching—broadening the understanding of teaching in higher education. Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 109–120.

4. Postareff, L. & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2011). Emotions and confidence within teaching in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 36(7), 799–813.

Telle Hailikari, Centre for Research and Development of Higher Education, University of Helsinki

P.O. Box 9, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland, sari.lindblom@helsinki.fi, www.helsinki.fi/yty/

Current themes of research:

Student learning at university. Academic emotions. Procrastination. Approaches to learning. Motivation and self-efficacy beliefs.

Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:

1. Hailikari, T., Katajavuori, N. & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2008). The relevance of prior knowledge in learning and instructional design. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72(5), article 113 (8 pages).

2. Hailikari, T., Nevgi, A. & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2007). Exploring alternative ways of assessing prior knowledge, its components and their relation to learning outcomes. A mathematics-based case study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33(3–4), 320–337.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Haarala-Muhonen, A., Postareff, L. et al. Exploration of individual study paths of successful first-year students: an interview study. Eur J Psychol Educ 32, 687–701 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-016-0315-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-016-0315-8

Keywords

Navigation