Abstract
Immune priming provides protection to repeated encounters against pathogens. Recent studies indicate that invertebrates are capable of immune priming (an adaptive immune response functionally similar to that of vertebrates). These studies have also revealed individual variation in immune priming, and one explanation is that this response has associated energetic costs. Life history traits such as reproduction could influence an organism’s ability to utilize immune priming based on available energy reserves. According to theory, costs of immune priming would impact life history traits of the challenged animal. We investigated whether mating activity impairs immune priming ability using the house cricket, Acheta domesticus. We allowed adults to mate or not, and each group was further divided into two groups: those induced to produce immune priming (using a Lethal Dose 10 (LD10) of the bacteria Serratia marcescens, followed by a LD75 of the same pathogen) and those not induced to produce immune priming (challenged with a LD75 of S. marcescens). Immune priming response was determined by measuring phagocytic activity levels. As supportive of priming, we found that priming elicited higher phagocytic activity. Also, non-mated individuals showed higher phagocytic rates than mated individuals. However, a priming by mating interaction showed similarly intense phagocytic rates among groups. This implies that resources used for biological functions elicited during (e.g. sperm transfer) and after mating (e.g. egg production) are not costly enough to impair immune priming ability based on phagocytic activity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bascuñán-García P, Lara C, Córdoba-Aguilar A (2010) Immune investment impairs growth, female reproduction, and survival in the house cricket, Acheta domesticus. J Insect Physiol 56:204–211
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B (2012) Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999-0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
Cisarovsky G, Schmid-Hempel P, Sadd BM (2012) Robustness of the outcome of adult bumblebee infection with a trypanosome parasite after varied parasite exposures during larval development. J Evol Biol 25:1053–1059
Cong M, Song L, Wang L, Zhao J, Qiu L, Li L, Zhang H (2008) The enhanced immune protection of Zhikong scallop Chlamys farreri on the secondary encounter with Listonella anguillarum. Comp Biochem Physiol B: Biochem Mol Biol 151:191–196
Contreras-Garduño J, Rodriguez MC, Rodriguez MH, Alvarado-Delgado A, Lanz-Mendoza H (2014) Cost of immune priming within generations: trade-off between infection and reproduction. Microbes Infect 16:261–267
Core Development Team R (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna
Daukste J, Kivleniece I, Krama T, Rantala MJ, Krams I (2012) Senescence in immune priming and attractiveness in a beetle. J Evol Biol 25:1298–1304
Folstad I, Karter AJ (1992) Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap. Am Nat 139:603–622
Freitak D, Heckel DG, Vogel H (2009) Dietary-dependent trans-generational immune priming in an insect herbivore. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:2617–2624
González-Tokman DM, González-Santoyo I, Lanz-Mendoza H, Córdoba Aguilar A (2010) Territorial damselflies do not show immunological priming in the wild. Physiol Entomol 35:364–372
Hamilton WD, Zuk M (1982) Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science 218:384–387
Kotiaho JS (2001) Costs of sexual traits: a mismatch between theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Biol Rev 76:365–376
Lawniczak MKN, Barnes AI, Linklater JR, Boone JM, Wigby S, Chapman T (2007) Mating and immunity in invertebrates. Trends Ecol Evol 22:48–55
Lawrence G, Zera AJ (2006) The cost of reproduction: the devil in details. Trends Ecol Evol 22:80–86
Little TJ, Kraaijeveld AR (2004) Ecological and evolutionary implications of immunological priming in invertebrates. Trends Ecol Evol 19:58–60
Longdon B, Cao C, Martinez J, Jiggins FM (2013) Previous exposure to an RNA virus does not protect against subsequent infection in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS ONE 8:e73833
Mills SC, Grapputo A, Jokinen I, Koskela E, Mappes T, Poikonen T (2009) Fitness trade-offs mediated by immunosuppression costs in a small mammal. Evolution 64:166–179
Moret Y (2006) “Trans-generational immune priming”: specific enhancement of the antimicrobial immune response in the mealworm beetle, Tenebrio molitor. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:1399–1405
Moret Y, Schmid-Hempel P (2000) Survival for immunity: the price of immune system activation for bumblebee workers. Science 290:1166–1168
Pham LN, Dionne MS, Shirasu-Hiza M, Schneider DS (2007) A specific primed immune response in Drosophila is dependent on phagocytes. PLoS Pathog 3:1–8
Pope EC, Powell A, Roberts EC, Shields RJ, Wardle R, Rowley AF (2011) Enhanced cellular immunity in shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) after vaccination. PLoS ONE 6:e20960
Reber A, Chapuisat M (2012) No evidence for immune priming in ants exposed to a fungal pathogen. PLoS ONE 7:e35372
Roth O, Kurtz J (2009) Phagocytosis mediates specificity in the immune defence of an invertebrate, the woodlouse Porcellio scaber (Crustacea: Isopoda). Dev Comp Immunol 33:1151–1155
Roth O, Sadd BM, Schmid-Hempel P, Kurtz J (2009) Strain-specific priming of resistance in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:145–151
Rowley AF, Pope EC (2012) Vaccines and crustacean aquaculture—a mechanistic exploration. Aquaculture 334:1–11
Ryder JJ, Siva-Jothy MT (2000) Male calling song provides a reliable signal of immune function in a cricket. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:1171–1175
Sadd BM, Schmid-Hempel P (2009) A distinct infection cost associated with trans-generational priming of antibacterial immunity in bumble-bees. Biol Lett 5:798–801
Sheldon BC, Verhulst S (1996) Ecological immunology: costly parasite defences and trade-offs in evolutionary ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 11:317–321
Stearns SC (1992) The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Strand MR (2008) Insect hemocytes and their role in immunity. In: Beckage NE (ed) Insect Immunology Academic press 25-47
Trauer U, Hilker M (2013) Parental legacy in insects: variation of transgenerational immune priming during offspring development. PLoS ONE 8:e63392
Wolfner MF (2002) The gifts that keep on giving: physiological functions and evolutionary dynamics of male seminal proteins in Drosophila. Heredity 88:85–93
Zanchi C, Troussard JP, Martinaud G, Moreau J, Moret Y (2011) Differential expression and costs between maternally and paternally derived immune priming for offspring in an insect. J Anim Ecol 8:1174–1183
Zera AJ, Harshman LG (2001) The physiology of life history trade-offs in animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:95–126
Zuk M, Mckean KA (1996) Sex differences in parasite infections: patterns and processes. Int J Parasitol 26:1009–1024
Acknowledgments
To PAPIIT project 211506 for financial support. Librado Cordero Méndez (Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala) provided the crickets. Miguel A. Moreno-García and Miguel Tapia R. provided key assistance in the laboratory. Raúl I. Martínez-Becerril provided logistic support. Two reviewers provided key comments that improved a previous version. This work constitutes a partial fulfillment for the PhD degree of Adriana Nava-Sánchez at the graduate program Doctorado en Ciencias Biomédicas of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Conflict of interest
Authors state not to have any conflict of interests.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary material Table 1
(DOCX 11 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nava-Sánchez, A., González-Tokman, D., Munguía-Steyer, R. et al. Does mating activity impair phagocytosis-mediated priming immune response? A test using the house cricket, Acheta domesticus . acta ethol 18, 295–299 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-015-0215-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-015-0215-y