Skip to main content
Log in

Sex differences in territorial defense in a shell-breeding cichlid, Neolamprologus multifasciatus

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
acta ethologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most studies of territorial defense focus on responses of either male or female residents but not both. In a laboratory study of Neolamprologus multifasciatus, a territorial, shell-inhabiting cichlid from Lake Tanganyika, we altered the distribution of shells to manipulate defense costs and examined resident pairs’ behavioral responses to intruders. Given that defense costs are lower when territories are separated by visually distinctive structures, we used the presence/absence of a buffer zone, an area of bare sand, to alter defense costs. With a buffer zone, males and females invested 10.4 and 5.4 % of their time in defense, respectively. Without a buffer zone, males increased time in defense (30.1 %) more than did females (6.6 %). Females rarely performed highly aggressive acts; males performed such acts more frequently against male intruders than against female intruders and when there was no buffer zone. Overall, intrasexual aggression was more frequent, and males interacted with a greater proportion of same-sex intruders (71.6 %) than did females (33.4 %). Without a buffer zone, the proportion of intruders with which the males interacted increased with the number of intrusions. This was not the case for females or for either sex when a buffer zone was present. These findings show that males and females responded differently to changes in shell distribution. We interpret this finding as a sex difference in response to altered defense costs. The stronger tendency of males to intrude when a buffer zone was absent indicates that the shell-free area between territories may have acted as a visual landmark that reduced intrusions by neighboring territory holders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akin JA (1998) Intra- and inter-sexual aggression in the ground skink (Scincella lateralis). Can J Zool 76:87–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcock J (1983) Post copulatory mate guarding by males of the damselfly (Hetaerina vulnerata). Anim Behav 30:99–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amundsen T (2000) Why are female birds ornamented? Trends Ecol Evol 15:149–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleby BM, Yamaguchi N, Johnson PJ, MacDonalds DW (1999) Sex-specific territorial responses in tawny owls Strix aluco. Ibis 141:91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnott G, Elwood RW (2009) Gender differences in aggressive behavior in convict cichlids. Anim Behav 78:1221–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balshine-Earn S, McAndrew BJ (1995) Sex-role reversal in the black-chinned tilapia, Sarotherodon melanotheron (Ruppel) (Cichlidae). Behavior 132:861–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bard SC, Hau M, Wikelski M, Wingfield JC (2002) Vocal distinctiveness and response to conspecific playback in the spotted antbird, a Neotropical suboscine. Condor 104:387–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker DG, Murphy JB, Smith KW (1979) Social behavior in a captive group of Indian pythons, Python molurus with formation of a linear social hierarchy. Copeia 1979:466–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergmueller R, Taborsky M (2005) Experimental manipulation of helping in a cooperative breeder: helpers ‘pay to stay’ by pre-emptive appeasement. Anim Behav 69:19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch DS, Wingfield JC, Moore IT (2004) Territorial aggression of a tropical passerine, Zonotrichia capensis, in response to variety of conspecific intruders. Behavior 141:1173–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss DM (2005) The handbook of evolutionary psychology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chellappa S, Huntingford EA, Strang RHC, Thompson RY (1989) Annual variation in energy reserves in male three-spine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus L. J Fish Biol 35:275–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coie JD, Dodge KA (1997) Aggression and antisocial behavior. In: Damon W, Eisenberg N (eds) Handbook of child psychology. Wiley, New York, pp 779–862

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig JL (1979) Habitat variation in the social organization of a communal gallinule, the pukeko, Porphyrio porphyrio melanotus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:331–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig P (1996) Intertidal territoriality and time-budget of the surgeonfish, Acanthurus lineatus, in American Samoa Environ. Biol Fish 46:27–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB (1978) Territorial defense in the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria): the resident always wins. Anim Behav 26:138–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desjardins JK, Stiver KA, Fitzpatrick JL, Balshine S (2006) Differential responses to territory intrusions in cooperatively breeding fish. Anim Behav 5:595–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Draud M, Lynch PAE (2002) Asymmetric contests for breeding sites between monogamous pairs of convict cichlids (Archocentrus nigrofasciatum, Cichlidae): pair experience pays. Behavior 139:861–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draud M, Macias-Ordonez R, Verga J, Itzkowitzc M (2004) Female and male Texas cichlids (Herichthys cyanoguttatum) do not fight by the same rules. Behav Ecol 2004:102–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eason PK, Cobbs GA, Trinca KG (1999) The use of landmarks to define territorial boundaries. Anim Behav 58:85–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eason PK, Hannon SJ (2003) Effect of pairing status on use of space by territorial willow ptarmigan (Lagopus lagopus): bachelor males choose life on the edge. Auk 120:497–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fedy BC, Stutchbury BJM (2005) Territory defense in tropical birds: females as aggressive as males? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58:414–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ficken MS (1962) Agonistic behavior and territory in the American redstart. Auk 79:607–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster MS (1981) Cooperative behavior and social organization of the swallow-tailed manakin (Chiroxiphia caudate). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9:167–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galeotti P, Sacchi R, Perni E (1997) Cooperative defense and intrasexual aggression in scops owls (Otus scops): responses to playback male and female calls. J Raptor Res 31(4):353–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling LM, Roberts SC (2001) Scent-marking by male mammals: cheat-proof signals to competitors and mates. Adv Stud Behav 30:169–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goubault M, Mack AFS, Hardy ICW (2007) Encountering competitors reduces clutch size and increases offspring size in a parasitoid with female–female fighting. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 274:2571–2577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hack MA (1997) The energetic costs of fighting in the house cricket, Acheta domesticus L. Behav Ecol 8:28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall ML (2000) The function of duetting in magpie-larks: conflict, cooperation, or commitment? Anim Behav 60:667–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamelin F, Lewis MA (2010) A differential game theoretical analysis of mechanistic models for territoriality. J Math Biol 61:665–694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton IM, Heg D, Bender N (2005) Size differences within a dominance hierarchy influence conflict and help in a cooperatively breeding cichlid. Behavior 142:1591–1613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hand JL (1986) Territory defense and associated vocalizations of a western gulls. Field Ornithol 57:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding JA, Almany GR, Houck LD, Hixon MA (2003) Experimental analysis of monogamy in the Caribbean cleaner goby, Gobiosoma evelynae. Anim Behav 65:865–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hixon MA (1981) An experimental analysis of territoriality in the California reef fish Embiotoca jacksoni (Embiotocidae). Copeia 1981:653–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hixon MA, Carpenter FL, Paton DC (1983) Territory area, flower density, and time budgeting in hummingbirds: an experimental and theoretical analysis. Am Nat 122:366–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itzkowitz M, Nyby J (1982) Field observations of parental behavior of the Texas cichlid Cichlasoma cyanoguttatum. Am Midl Nat 108:364–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itzkowitz M (1984) Parental division of labor in a monogamous fish. Behavior 89:251–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itzkowitz M (1985) Sexual differences in offspring defense in a monogamous cichlid fish. Z Tierpsychol 70:247–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itzkowitz M, Santangelo N, Cleveland A, Bockelman A, Richter M (2005) Is the selection of sex-typical parental roles based on an assessment process? A test in the monogamous convict cichlid fish. Anim Behav 69:95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger RG, Nishikawa KCB, Barnard DE (1983) Foraging tactics of a terrestrial salamander: cost of territorial defense. Anim Behav 31:191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenleyside MHA, Bailey RC, Young VH (1990) Variation in the mating system and associated parental behavior of captive and free-living Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum (Pisces, Cichlidae). Behavior 112:202–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluge AG (1981) The life history, social organization and parental behavior of a Hyla rosenbergi a nest-building gladiator frog. Misc Publ Mus Zool Univ Mich 160:1–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler U (1997) Zur struktur und evolution des sozialsystems von Neolamprologus multifasciatus (Cichlidae, Pices), dem kleinsten schneckenbuntbarsch des Tanganjikasees. Disseratation, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

  • LaManna JR, Eason PK (2003) Effects of landmarks on territorial establishment. Anim Behav 65:471–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin RN (1996) Song behavior and reproductive strategies in a duetting wren, Thryothorus nigricapillus: II. Playback experiments. Anim Behav 52:1107–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis M, Moorcroft P (2001) ESS analysis of mechanistic models for territoriality: the value of scent marks in spatial resource partitioning. J Theor Biol 210:449–461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logue DM, Gammon DE (2004) Duet song and sex roles during territory defense in a tropical bird, the black-bellied wren, Thryothorus fasciatoventris. Anim Behav 68:721–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby EE, Jacklin CN (1974) The psychology of sex differences. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Marler CA, Moore CM (1989) Time and energy costs of aggression in testosterone implanted free-living male mountain spiny lizards (Sceloporus jarrovi). Physiol Zool 62:1334–1350

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller EH (1974) Walrus ethology I. The social role of tusks and applications of mutidimentional scaling. Can J Zool 53:590–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorcroft PR, Lewis MA (2006) Mechanistic home range analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton ES, Derrickson KC (1996) Song ranging by the dusky antbird., Cercomarca tyrannia: ranging without song learning. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 39:195–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier T (2008) Development of a new model system for studies of the economic theory of territoriality: Neolamprologus multifasciatus. MS Thesis, University of Louisville

  • Petersen G, Hardy ICW (1996) The importance of being larger: parasitoid intruder–owner contests and their implications for clutch size. Anim Behav 51:1363–1373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter PE (1972) Territorial behavior in Savannah sparrows in southeastern Michigan. Wilson Bull 84:48–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinard A, Cezilly F (2012) Sex roles during conspecific territorial defense in Zenaida dove, Zenaida aurita. Anim Behav 83:47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid ML, Weatherhead PJ (1988) Topographical constraints on competition for territories. Oikos 51:115–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riechert SE (1988) The energetic costs of fighting. Am Zool 28:877–884

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollo LD, Wellington WG (1979) Intra- and inter-specific agonistic behavior among terrestrial slugs (Pulmonata, Stylommatophora). Can J Zool 57:846–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato T, Gashagaza MM (1997) Shell-brooding cichlid fishes of Lake Tanganyika: their habitats and mating systems. In: Kawanabe H, Hori M, Nagoshi M (eds) Fish communities in Lake Tanganyika. Kyoto University Press, Kyoto, pp 221–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomonson MG, Balda RP (1977) Winter territoriality of Townsend's Solitaires (Myadestes townsendi) in a pinon-juniper-ponderosa pine ecotone. Condor 79:148–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith CC (1968) The adaptive nature of social organization in the genus of three squirrels Taniiasciiirus. Ecol Monog 38:31–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schradin C, Lamprecht J (2000) Female-biased immigration and male peace-keeping in groups of the shell-dwelling cichlid fish Neolamprologus multifasciatus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48(3):236–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schradin C, Lamprecht J (2002) Causes of female emigration in the group-living cichlid fish Neolamprologus multifasciatus. Ethology 108(3):237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith C, Wootton RJ (1995) The costs of parental care in teleost fishes. Rev Fish Biol Fish 5:7–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith C, Wootton RJ (1999) Parental energy expenditure of the male three-spined stickleback. J Fish Biol 54:1132–1136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Grayton PK, Keenleyside MHA (1978) Male–female roles in Heterotilapia multispinosa (Pisces: Cichlidae). Anim Behav 26:520–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sogge MK, Koronkiewiczi TJ, Van Riper C III, Durst SL (2007) Willow flycatcher nonbreeding territory defense behavior in Cost Rica. Condor 109:475–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence R, Smith C (2006) Female mate preferences in the zebrafish (Danio rerio). Behav Ecol 17:779–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamps JA (1998) Territoriality. In: Greenburg G, Haraway MM (eds) Comparative psychology: a handbook. Garland Publishing, New York, pp 761–770

    Google Scholar 

  • Thresher RE (1979) Field analysis of territoriality of three-spot damselfish Eupomacentrus planifrons. Copeia 266–75

  • van den Assem J (1967) Territory in the Three-Spined Stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus. An experimental study in intra-specific competition. Behav 16: III-164

  • Welsh DA (1975) Savannah sparrow breeding and territoriality on a Nova Scotia dune beach. Auk 92:235–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisenden BD (1994) Factors affecting mate desertion by males in free-ranging convict cichlids (Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum). Behav Ecol 5:439–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zegers DA (1981) Time budgets of Wyoming ground squirrels, Spermophilus elegans. Great Basin Nat 41:221–228

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank Kenneth McKaye, Katharina Hirschenhauser, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piyumika S. Suriyampola.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suriyampola, P.S., Eason, P.K. Sex differences in territorial defense in a shell-breeding cichlid, Neolamprologus multifasciatus . acta ethol 18, 59–68 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-014-0182-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-014-0182-8

Keywords

Navigation