Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Values for health states with different life durations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The European Journal of Health Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Recent research suggests that the value of health states may depend on their duration, implying a more complex relationship between quality and quantity of life than the standard linear relationship assumed in the quality-adjusted life years (QALY) model.

Objective

This study models how duration affects the value of health states, using discrete choice data.

Methods

A study was conducted comprising health profiles including various durations. Health states were described with the EQ-5D. Duration was introduced as a sixth domain with six levels (1, 5, 10, 15, 30, 50 years). Sixty pairs of health profiles were selected, applying a Bayesian approach. Two hundred eight university students self-completed the computerized response tasks. Data were analyzed with a conditional logistic regression model.

Results

There is clear evidence for non-linear values for duration, that is, preferences for duration are more accurately described by a logarithmic function.

Conclusions

In discrete choice experiments using health states with different durations, these data present the first evidence for decreasing marginal utility for duration. Our results suggest that refinement of the standard QALY framework may be needed for states with a long duration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fanshel, S., Bush, J.W.: A health-status index and its application to health-services outcomes. Oper. Res. 18, 1021–1066 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sackett, D.L., Torrance, G.W.: The utility of different health states as perceived by the general public. J. Chronic. Dis. 31, 697–704 (1978)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pliskin, J.S., Shepard, D.S., Weinstein, M.C.: Utility functions for life years and health status. Oper. Res. 28, 206–224 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stalmeier, P.F.M., Wakker, P.P., Bezembinder, T.G.G.: Preference reversals: violations of unidimensional procedure invariance. J. Experimental Psychology-Human Percept. Perform. 23(4), 1196–1205 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Krabbe, P.F.M., Bonsel, G.J.: Sequence effects; health profiles, and the QALY model. In search of realistic modeling. Med. Decis. Mak. 18, 178–188 (1998)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dolan, P., Stalmeier, P.: The validity of time trade-off values in calculating QALYs: constant proportional time trade-off versus the proportional heuristic. J. Health Economics 22(3), 445–458 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Spencer, A.: A test of the QALY model when health varies over time. Soc. Sci. Med. 57, 1697–1706 (2003)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ryan, M., Gerard, K., Amaya-Amaya, M. (eds.) Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Value Health and Health Care. Springer, Berlin (2008)

  9. Hakim, Z., Pathak, D.S.: Modelling the Euroqol data: a comparison of discrete choice conjoint and conditional preference modelling. Health. Econ. 8, 103–116 (1999)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Szeinbach, S.L., Barnes, J.H., McGhan, W.F., et al.: Using conjoint analysis to evaluate health state preferences. Drug. Inf. J. 33, 849–858 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. McKenzie, L., Cairns, J., Osman, L.: Symptom-based outcome measures for asthma: the use of discrete choice methods to assess patient preferences. Health. Policy. 57, 193–204 (2001)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McCabe, C., Brazier, J., Gilks, P., et al.: Using rank data to estimate health state utility models. J. Health. Econ. 25, 418–431 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ratcliffe, J., Brazier, J., Tsuchiya, A., et al.: Using DCE and ranking data to estimate cardinal values for health states for deriving a preference-based single index from the sexual quality of life questionnaire. Health. Econ. 18, 1261–1276 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stolk, E., Oppe, M., Scalone, L., Krabbe, P.F.M.: Discrete choice modeling for the quantification of health states: the case of the EQ-5D. Value in Health. 13(8), 1005–1013 (2010)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brazier, J., Rowen, D., Yang, Y., Tsuchiya, A.: Comparison of health state utility values derived using time trade-off, rank and discrete choice data anchored on the full health-dead scale. Eur. J. Health. Econ. 13(5), 575–587 (2012)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bansback, N., Brazier, J., Tsuchiya, A., Anis, A.: Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate health state utility values. J. Health. Econ. 31(1), 306–318 (2012)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rabin, R., de Charro, F.: EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann. Med. 33, 337–343 (2001)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rose, J.M., Bliemer, M.C.J.: Stated preference experimental design strategies. In: Hensher, D.A., Button, K. (eds.) Transport modeling (2nd ed.). Handbooks in transport, 1st edn. Elsevier, Oxford (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shaw, J.W., Johnson, J.A., Coons, S.J.: US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med. Care. 43, 203–220 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lamers, L.M., McDonnell, J., Stalmeier, P.F.M., et al.: The Dutch tariff: results and arguments for an effective design for national EQ-5D valuation studies. Health. Econ. 15, 1121–1132 (2006)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dolan, P.: Modeling valuations for the EuroQoL health states. Med. Care. 35, 1095–1108 (1997)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Huber, W., Zwerina, K.: The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs. J Marketing Research. 33, 307–317 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Louviere, J.J., Hensher, D.A., Swait, J.D.: Stated choice methods: analysis and application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Manski, C.: The structure of random utility models. Theor. Decis. 8, 229–254 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Train, K.E.: Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Sutherland, H.J., Llewellyn-Thomas, H., Boyd, N.F., Till, J.E.: Attitudes towards quality of survival: the concept of maximum endurable time. Med. Decis. Making. 2, 299–309 (1982)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Stalmeier, P.F.M., Chapman, G.B., de Boer, A.G.E.M., et al.: A fallacy of the multiplicative QALY model for low quality weights in students and patients judging hypothetical health states. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health. Care. 17, 488–496 (2001)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Robinson, A., Spencer, A.: Exploring challenges to TTO utilities: valuing states worse than dead. Health. Econ. 15, 393–402 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Stalmeier, P.F.M., Lamers, L.M., Busschbach, J.J.V., Krabbe, P.F.M.: On the assessment of preferences for health and duration maximal endurable time and better than dead preferences. Med. Care. 45, 835–841 (2007)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Loewenstein, G.F., Prelec, D.: Preferences for sequences of outcomes. Psychol. Rev. 100(1), 91–108 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. van der Pol, M., Cairns, J.: Estimating time preferences for health using discrete choice experiments. Soc. Sci. Med. 52, 1459–1470 (2001)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially based on our inspiring discussions and reflections during several meetings of the EuroQol Valuation Task Force. Therefore, we wish to express our thanks in particular to Frank de Charro, Nancy Devlin, Ben van Hout, Paul Kind, and David Parkin. A special thank you to Elly Stolk and Mark Oppe for their precious contributions to the study design and data collection. We thank also Eva de Vries, Anke Naaborgh, and Mark Huijsman for their assistance in the data collection, and Roberta Ciampichini for her assistance in data management. Everyone who contributed significantly to the work has been listed in the acknowledgements. This research was made possible by a grant provided by the EuroQoL Group. It was presented at the ISPOR 13th Annual European Congress in Prague, November 2010, and was a candidate for receiving the best poster research presentation award.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript have no conflict of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luciana Scalone.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scalone, L., Stalmeier, P.F.M., Milani, S. et al. Values for health states with different life durations. Eur J Health Econ 16, 917–925 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-014-0634-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-014-0634-0

Keywords

Navigation