Skip to main content
Log in

A defence of subjective fiducial inference

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper defends the fiducial argument. In particular, an interpretation of the fiducial argument is defended in which fiducial probability is treated as being subjective and the role taken by pivots in a more standard interpretation is taken by what are called primary random variables, which in fact form a special class of pivots. The resulting methodology, which is referred to as subjective fiducial inference, is outlined in the first part of the paper. This is followed by a defence of this methodology arranged in a series of criticisms and responses. These criticisms reflect objections that are often raised against standard fiducial inference and incorporate more specific concerns that are likely to exist with respect to subjective fiducial inference. It is hoped that the responses to these criticisms clarify the contribution that a system of fiducial reasoning can make to statistical inference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnard, G.A.: R. A. Fisher: a true Bayesian? Int. Stat. Rev. 55, 183–189 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, G.A.: Pivotal models and the fiducial argument. Int. Stat. Rev. 63, 309–323 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo, J.M.: Reference posterior distributions for Bayesian inference (with discussion). J. Royal Stat. Soc. B 41, 113–147 (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L.: The conditional level of Student’s t test. Ann. Math. Stat. 38, 1068–1071 (1967)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Buehler, R.J., Feddersen, A.P.: Note on a conditional property of Student’s t. Ann. Math. Stat. 34, 1098–1100 (1963)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D.R.: Comments on ‘The Philosophy of Statistics’ by D. V. Lindley. J. Royal Stat. Soc. D 49, 321–324 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawid, A.P., Stone, M., Zidek, J.V.: Marginalization paradoxes in Bayesian and structural inference (with discussion). J. Royal Stat. Soc. B 35, 189–233 (1973)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dawid, A.P., Stone, M.: The functional-model basis of fiducial inference. Ann. Stat. 10, 1054–1067 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A.P.: A generalization of Bayesian inference (with discussion). J. Royal Stat. Soc. B 30, 205–247 (1968)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A.W.F.: Fiducial probability. Statistician 25, 15–35 (1976)

  • Efron, B.: R. A. Fisher in the 21st Century (with discussion). Stat. Sci. 13, 95–122 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • de Finetti, B.: Theory of probability, vol. 1. Wiley, Chichester (1974)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • de Finetti, B.: Theory of probability, vol. 2. Wiley, Chichester (1975)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, T.L.: Theories of probability: an examination of foundations. Academic Press, New York (1973)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A.: Inverse probability. Math. Proceed. Cambridge Philosop. Soc. 26, 528–535 (1930)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A.: Statistical methods and scientific inference, 1st edn. Hafner Press, New York (1956) [2nd edn., 1959; 3rd edn., 1973]

  • Fraser, D.A.S.: On fiducial inference. Ann. Math. Stat. 32, 661–676 (1961)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, D.A.S.: Structural probability and a generalization. Biometrika 53, 1–9 (1966)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, D.A.S.: Events, information processing, and the structured model. In: Godambe, V.P., Sprott, D.A. (eds.) Foundations of Statistical Inference, pp. 32–55. Holt, Renehart and Winston, Toronto (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, M.: Objective priors: an introduction for frequentists (with discussion). Stat. Sci. 26, 187–211 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Good, I.J.: Kinds of probability. Science 129, 443–447 (1959)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Good, I.J.: The interface between statistics and the philosophy of science (with discussion). Stat. Sci. 3, 386–412 (1988)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goutis, C., Casella, G.: Frequentist post-data inference. Int. Stat. Rev. 63, 325–344 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hannig, J.: On generalized fiducial inference. Stat. Sinica 19, 491–544 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hannig, J., Iyer, H., Patterson, P.: Fiducial generalized confidence intervals. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 101, 254–269 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, H.: Theory of probability, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1961)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kass, R.E., Wasserman, L.: The selection of prior distributions by formal rules. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 91, 1343–1370 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, D.: Some comments on ‘Non-informative priors do not exist’. J. Stat. Plan. Infer. 65, 182–184 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, J.G.: Fiducial inference. Int. Stat. Rev. 46, 147–170 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G.K.: Conditional properties of statistical procedures. Ann. Stat. 7, 742–755 (1979a)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G.K.: Conditional properties of statistical procedures for location and scale families. Ann. Stat. 7, 756–771 (1979b)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L.J.: The foundations of statistics. Wiley, New York (1954)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L.J.: The foundations of statistics reconsidered. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol. 1., pp. 575–586, University of California Press, Berkeley (1961)

  • Seidenfeld, T.: Why I am not an objective Bayesian; some reflections prompted by Rosenkrantz. Theory Decision 11, 413–440 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, G.: The unity and diversity of probability (with discussion). Stat Sci 5, 435–462 (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Spetzler, C.S., Stael von Holstein, C.A.S.: Probability encoding in decision analysis. Manag. Sci. 22, 340–358 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M.: Strong inconsistency from uniform priors (with discussion). J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 71, 114–125 (1976)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Taraldsen, G., Lindqvist, B.H.: Fiducial theory and optimal inference. Ann. Stat. 41, 323–341 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C.M., Hannig, J., Iyer, H.K.: Fiducial prediction intervals. J. Stat. Plan. Infer. 142, 1980–1990 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, B.L.: The generalization of ‘Student’s’ problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika 34, 28–35 (1947)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, G.N.: On resolving the controversy in statistical inference (with discussion). J. Royal Stat. Soc. B 39, 119–171 (1977)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yates, F.: Fiducial probability, recognisable sub-sets and Behrens’ test. Biometrics 20, 343–360 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zabell, S.L.: R. A. Fisher and the fiducial argument. Stat. Sci. 7, 369–387 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Russell J. Bowater.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bowater, R.J. A defence of subjective fiducial inference. AStA Adv Stat Anal 101, 177–197 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10182-016-0285-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10182-016-0285-9

Keywords

Navigation