Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multidisciplinary evaluation at baseline and during treatment improves the rate of compliance and efficacy of deferasirox in elderly myelodysplastic patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Deferasirox (DFX) is used to reduce iron levels in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who develop iron overload after chronic red blood cell infusions. However, DFX can be associated with renal and gastrointestinal toxicities, which may cause treatment interruption or discontinuation. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness and safety of DFX in patients with MDS.

Methods

This multicenter, retrospective, observational study was conducted at two hospitals in Italy. Elderly patients with transfusion-dependent MDS received DFX for up to 12 months and were divided into two groups: group A comprised patients who were not under multidisciplinary assessment; group B comprised patients under multidisciplinary control. Treatment effectiveness was estimated by monitoring the serum ferritin (SF) levels throughout the study. Any treatment-related adverse events (AEs), clinically relevant analytical alterations, and reasons for treatment discontinuation were monitored.

Results

The study included 44 patients (13 female, 31 male; median age 77.0 years). At 3 months, SF levels decreased by ≥20 % in 29 and 31 % of patients in groups A and B, respectively, in 17 and 36 % of patients at 6 months, and in 22 and 58 % at 12 months. The most common AEs were diarrhea and increased serum creatinine, which were more frequent in group A. The discontinuation rate after renal AE was 15 and 5 % in groups A and B, respectively.

Conclusion

Multidisciplinary evaluation can be an effective strategy for monitoring renal function in patients on DFX therapy, to improve treatment adherence and overall efficacy in elderly patients with MDS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tefferi A, Vardiman JW (2009) Myelodysplastic syndromes. N Engl J Med 361(19):1872–1885. doi:10.1056/NEJMra0902908

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aul C, Giagounidis A, Germing U (2001) Epidemiological features of myelodysplastic syndromes: results from regional cancer surveys and hospital-based statistics. Int J Hematol 73(4):405–410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cogle CR (2015) Incidence and Burden of the Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Current hematologic malignancy reports 10(3):272–281. doi:10.1007/s11899-015-0269-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ma X, Does M, Raza A et al (2007) Myelodysplastic syndromes: incidence and survival in the United States. Cancer 109(8):1536–1542. doi:10.1002/cncr.22570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Greenberg P, Cox C, LeBeau MM et al (1997) International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 89(6):2079–2088

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Greenberg PL, Tuechler H, Schanz J et al (2012) Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 120(12):2454–2465. doi:10.1182/blood-2012-03-420489

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Malcovati L, Germing U, Kuendgen A et al (2007) Time-dependent prognostic scoring system for predicting survival and leukemic evolution in myelodysplastic syndromes. J Clin Oncol 25(23):3503–3510. doi:10.1200/jco.2006.08.5696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Greenberg PL, Attar E, Bennett JM et al (2013) Myelodysplastic syndromes: clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 11(7):838–874

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Malcovati L, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Bowen D et al (2013) Diagnosis and treatment of primary myelodysplastic syndromes in adults: recommendations from the European LeukemiaNet. Blood 122(17):2943–2964. doi:10.1182/blood-2013-03-492884

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ades L, Santini V (2013) Hypomethylating agents and chemotherapy in MDS. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 26(4):411–419. doi:10.1016/j.beha.2013.09.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brierley CK, Steensma DP (2016) Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in myelodysplastic syndromes: does pretransplant clonal burden matter? Curr Opin Hematol 23(2):167–174. doi:10.1097/moh.0000000000000217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. NCCN (2013) Clinical Practice guidelines in oncology: myelodysplastic syndromes. version. 1

  13. NCCN (2014) Clinical Practice guidelines in oncology: myelodysplastic syndromes. version. 2

  14. Santini V, Alessandrino PE, Angelucci E et al (2010) Clinical management of myelodysplastic syndromes: update of SIE, SIES, GITMO practice guidelines. Leuk Res 34(12):1576–1588. doi:10.1016/j.leukres.2010.01.018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cazzola M, Della Porta MG, Malcovati L (2008) Clinical relevance of anemia and transfusion iron overload in myelodysplastic syndromes. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program, pp 166–175. doi:10.1182/asheducation-2008.1.166

  16. Gattermann N (2012) Pathophysiological and clinical aspects of iron chelation therapy in MDS. Curr Pharm Des 18(22):3222–3234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Leitch HA, Vickars LM (2009) Supportive care and chelation therapy in MDS: are we saving lives or just lowering iron? Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program, pp 664–672. doi:10.1182/asheducation-2009.1.664

  18. Kautz L, Jung G, Valore EV et al (2014) Identification of erythroferrone as an erythroid regulator of iron metabolism. Nat Genet 46(7):678–684. doi:10.1038/ng.2996

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Leitch HA, Chan C, Leger CS et al (2012) Improved survival with iron chelation therapy for red blood cell transfusion dependent lower IPSS risk MDS may be more significant in patients with a non-RARS diagnosis. Leuk Res 36(11):1380–1386. doi:10.1016/j.leukres.2012.08.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Leitch HA, Leger CS, Goodman TA et al (2008) Improved survival in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome receiving iron chelation therapy. Clin Leuk 2(3):205–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rose C, Brechignac S, Vassilief D et al (2010) Does iron chelation therapy improve survival in regularly transfused lower risk MDS patients? A multicenter study by the GFM (Groupe Francophone des Myelodysplasies). Leuk Res 34(7):864–870. doi:10.1016/j.leukres.2009.12.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang LP, Keam SJ, Keating GM (2007) Deferasirox: a review of its use in the management of transfusional chronic iron overload. Drugs 67(15):2211–2230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tokuhira M, Sagawa M, Watanabe R et al (2011) Management of oral iron chelator deferasirox for transfusion-dependent patients with hematological disorders: 2-year experience at a single institution in Japan. Int J Clin Med 2(03):224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Meerpohl JJ, Schell LK, Rucker G et al (2014) Deferasirox for managing iron overload in people with myelodysplastic syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:CD007461. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007461.pub3

  25. Huang WF, Chou HC, Tsai YW et al (2014) Safety of deferasirox: a retrospective cohort study on the risks of gastrointestinal, liver and renal events. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 23(11):1176–1182. doi:10.1002/pds.3657

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang R, Gross CP, Halene S et al (2009) Comorbidities and survival in a large cohort of patients with newly diagnosed myelodysplastic syndromes. Leuk Res 33(12):1594–1598. doi:10.1016/j.leukres.2009.02.005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Breccia M, Federico V, Latagliata R et al (2011) Evaluation of comorbidities at diagnosis predicts outcome in myelodysplastic syndrome patients. Leuk Res 35(2):159–162. doi:10.1016/j.leukres.2010.06.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Della Porta MG, Malcovati L, Strupp C et al (2011) Risk stratification based on both disease status and extra-hematologic comorbidities in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Haematologica 96(3):441–449. doi:10.3324/haematol.2010.033506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sperr WR, Kundi M, Wimazal F et al (2013) Proposed score for survival of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Eur J Clin Invest 43(11):1120–1128. doi:10.1111/eci.12149

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Diaz-Garcia JD, Gallegos-Villalobos A, Gonzalez-Espinoza L et al (2014) Deferasirox nephrotoxicity-the knowns and unknowns. Nat Rev Nephrol 10(10):574–586. doi:10.1038/nrneph.2014.121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Brosnahan G, Gokden N, Swaminathan S (2008) Acute interstitial nephritis due to deferasirox: a case report. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23(10):3356–3358. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfn423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yew CT, Talaulikar GS, Falk MC et al (2010) Acute interstitial nephritis secondary to deferasirox causing acute renal injury needing short-term dialysis. Nephrology (Carlton) 15(3):377. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1797.2009.01183.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. European Medicines Agency (2013) Assessment report. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Assessment_Report_-_Variation/human/000670/WC500146154.pdf

  34. Food and Drug Administration (2007) New molecular entity (NME)—early safety findings. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/DrugSafetyNewsletter/ucm118813.htm

  35. Gattermann N, Finelli C, Porta MD et al (2010) Deferasirox in iron-overloaded patients with transfusion-dependent myelodysplastic syndromes: results from the large 1-year EPIC study. Leuk Res 34(9):1143–1150. doi:10.1016/j.leukres.2010.03.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Porter J, Galanello R, Saglio G et al (2008) Relative response of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and other transfusion-dependent anaemias to deferasirox (ICL670): a 1-yr prospective study. Eur J Haematol 80(2):168–176. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0609.2007.00985.x

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Ponticelli C, Musallam KM, Cianciulli P et al (2010) Renal complications in transfusion-dependent beta thalassaemia. Blood Rev 24(6):239–244. doi:10.1016/j.blre.2010.08.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Vichinsky E (2008) Clinical application of deferasirox: practical patient management. Am J Hematol 83(5):398–402. doi:10.1002/ajh.21119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Nishad Parkar, PhD, of Springer Healthcare Communications for providing technical and English editing of the manuscript. This medical writing assistance was funded by Novartis, Italy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eleonora Arboscello.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

LDC, LB, ELP, RR, and RF disclosed no conflict of interest. EA received honoraria from Ariad, Celgene, and Novartis for participating in round tables and writing congress reports.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Del Corso, L., Biale, L., Parodi, E.L. et al. Multidisciplinary evaluation at baseline and during treatment improves the rate of compliance and efficacy of deferasirox in elderly myelodysplastic patients. Int J Clin Oncol 22, 380–386 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-016-1042-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-016-1042-5

Keywords

Navigation