Skip to main content
Log in

Prostate-specific antigen measured 3 months after radical prostatectomy as a new predictor of biochemical recurrence

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study was undertaken to investigate if the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level measured 3 months after radical prostatectomy (RP) is a predictor of biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the clinicopathologic data of 174 patients with a follow-up of at least 3 years after RP for clinically localized prostate cancer. None of the patients received neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy. Subjects were categorized according to PSA level 3 months after RP (3M-PSA): <0.010 ng/mL (group 1; n = 119) or 0.010–0.100 ng/mL (group 2; n = 55). BCR was defined as two consecutive rises in PSA level ≥0.2 ng/mL.

Results

At a median follow-up of 69.5 months (range 36–113 months), 32 (18.4 %) patients experienced BCR. The median time to BCR was 16 months (range 4–98 months) after RP. The 5-year BCR-free survival rate was 92.6 and 57.4 % in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Patients in group 1 had a significantly higher BCR-free survival rate than those in group 2 (log-rank P < 0.001). According to the Cox proportional hazards model, patients with a 3M-PSA level of <0.010 ng/mL were at lower risk for BCR (P < 0.001), along with pathologic Gleason sum 6 (P = 0.028). PSA nadir level after RP was also a risk factor for BCR (log-rank P < 0.001). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for 3M-PSA to predict BCR was almost equivalent to that for the PSA nadir level (0.855 vs. 0.849).

Conclusions

3M-PSA is an independent predictor of BCR-free survival. Our findings might be used for a risk-adjusted follow-up protocol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ward JF, Blute ML, Slezak J et al (2003) The long-term clinical impact of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer 5 or more years after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 170:1872–1876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Han M, Partin AW, Pound CR et al (2001) Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience. Urol Clin N Am 28:555–565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Roehl KA, Han M, Ramos CG et al (2004) Cancer progression and survival rates following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy in 3478 consecutive patients: long-term results. J Urol 172:910–914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Freedland SJ, Humphreys EB, Mangold LA et al (2005) Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JAMA 294:433–439

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vesely S, Jarolim L, Schmidt M et al (2013) Parameters derived from the postoperative decline in ultrasensitive PSA improve the prediction of radical prostatectomy outcome. World J Urol 31:299–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hong SK, Park HZ, Lee WK et al (2010) Prognostic significance of undetectable ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen nadir after radical prostatectomy. Urology 76:723–727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kinoshita H, Kamoto T, Nishiyama H et al (2007) Prostate specific antigen nadir determined using ultra-sensitive prostate specific antigen as a predictor of biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy in Japanese males. Int J Urol 14:930–934

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Doherty AP, Bower M, Smith GL et al (2000) Undetectable ultrasensitive PSA after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer predicts relapse-free survival. Br J Cancer 83:1432–1436

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shen S, Lepor H, Yaffee R et al (2005) Ultrasensitive serum prostate specific antigen nadir accurately predicts the risk of early relapse after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 173:777–780

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Haese A, Huland E, Graefen M et al (1999) Ultrasensitive detection of prostate specific antigen in the followup of 422 patients after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 161:1206–1211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Eisenberg ML, Davies BJ, Cooperberg MR et al (2010) Prognostic implications of an undetectable ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen level after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 57:622–629

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Simmons MN, Stephenson AJ, Klein EA (2007) Natural history of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: risk assessment for secondary therapy. Eur Urol 51:1175–1184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou P, Chen MH, McLeod D et al (2005) Predictors of prostate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol 23:6992–6998

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. D’Amico AV, Chen MH, Roehl KA et al (2005) Identifying patients at risk for significant versus clinically insignificant postoperative prostate-specific antigen failure. J Clin Oncol 23:4975–4979

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Antonarakis ES, Feng Z, Trock BJ et al (2012) The natural history of metastatic progression in men with prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: long-term follow-up. BJU Int 109:32–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Oesterling JE, Chan DW, Epstein JI et al (1988) Prostate specific antigen in the preoperative and postoperative evaluation of localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. J Urol 139:766–772

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Partin AW, Oesterling JE (1994) The clinical usefulness of prostate specific antigen: update 1994. J Urol 152:1358–1368

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Thompson IM Jr, Tangen CM, Paradelo J et al (2006) Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathologically advanced prostate cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 296:2329–2335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bolla M, van Poppel H, Collette L et al (2005) Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911). Lancet 366:572–578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ganswindt U, Stenzl A, Bamberg M et al (2008) Adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer—a new standard? Eur Urol 54:528–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Briganti A, Wiegel T, Joniau S et al (2012) Early salvage radiation therapy does not compromise cancer control in patients with pT3N0 prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: results of a match-controlled multi-institutional analysis. Eur Urol 62:472–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Roberts SG, Blute ML, Bergstralh EJ et al (2001) PSA doubling time as a predictor of clinical progression after biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Mayo Clin Proc 76:576–581

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Boorjian SA, Thompson RH, Tollefson MK et al (2011) Long-term risk of clinical progression after biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy: the impact of time from surgery to recurrence. Eur Urol 59:893–899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hitoshi Inoue.

About this article

Cite this article

Inoue, H., Nishimura, K., Yamaguchi, S. et al. Prostate-specific antigen measured 3 months after radical prostatectomy as a new predictor of biochemical recurrence. Int J Clin Oncol 20, 171–175 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-014-0681-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-014-0681-7

Keywords

Navigation