Abstract
The objectives of this study were to document the utilization of MRI compared with CT in pregnant patients presenting with acute nontraumatic abdominal pain at our institution and to compare the diagnostic performance of the two modalities. A retrospective review identified all pregnant patients at our institution who had MRI or CT exams of the abdomen and/or pelvis for acute nontraumatic abdominal pain over a 3-year period from January 2008 through December 2010. The imaging diagnoses were compared with pathologic data or operative findings as the primary reference standard or with clinical follow-up and laboratory data as the secondary reference standard. Patients without surgically proven diagnoses were followed clinically until delivery, when possible. Ninety-four pregnant patients were included in this study: 61 MRI exams were performed in 57 patients, 44 CT exams were performed in 43 patients (including six patients who had both), and 72 patients (77 %) had ultrasound prior to cross-sectional imaging, with the appendix specifically assessed in 25 patients but visualized in only two of them. Of 61 MRI exams, 24 were considered positive for imaging diagnoses, 33 were negative, and 4 were equivocal. Of 44 CT exams, 24 were positive and 20 were negative. The test characteristics for MRI and CT in the diagnosis of acute abdominal pain were as follows: sensitivity 91 and 88 %, specificity 85 and 90 %, positive predictive value 81 and 91 %, negative predictive value 94 and 8 5 %, and diagnostic accuracy 88 and 88 %, respectively. Differences were not statistically significant (p value = 1). The majority of MRIs (34/61 = 56 %) were read by emergency radiologists. MRI and CT performed equally well in the evaluation of acute nontraumatic abdominal pain during pregnancy. Given its lack of ionizing radiation, MRI may be preferable. Given that the majority of MRIs were read by radiologists specializing in emergency imaging, this is a technique that emergency radiologists should be comfortable interpreting.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mayer IE, Hussain H (1998) Abdominal pain in pregnancy. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 27:1–36
Basaran A, Basaran M (2009) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis during pregnancy: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 64:481–488
Oto A, Srinivasan PN, Ernst RD et al (2006) Revisiting MRI for appendix location during pregnancy. AJR 186:883–887
Cappell MS, Friedel D (2003) Abdominal pain during pregnancy. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 32:1–58
Kennedy A (2000) Assessment of acute abdominal pain in the pregnant patient. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 21:64–77
McGory ML, Zingmond DS, Tillou A, Hiatt JR, Ko C, Cryer H (2007) Negative appendectomy in pregnant women is associated with a substantial risk of fetal loss. J Am Coll Surg 205:534–540
Lim HK, Bae SH, Seo GS (1992) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant women: value of sonography. AJR 159:539–542
Israel GM, Malguria N, McCarthy S, Copel J, Weinreb J (2008) MRI vs ultrasound for suspected appendicitis during pregnancy. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:428–433
Lazarus E, DeBenedectis C, North D, Spencer PK, Mayo-Smith WW (2009) Utilization of imaging in pregnant patients: 10-year review of 5270 examinations in 3285 patients—1997-2006. Radiology 251:517–524
Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C, Borgstede JP, Bradley WG, Froelich JW et al (2007) ACR guidance document for safe MR practices: 2007. AJR 188:1447–1474
ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Acute abdominal pain, pregnant patient. http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/AppCriteria/Diagnostic/AcuteAbdominalPainFeverSuspectedAbdominalAbscess.pdf. Accessed June 14, 2012
Birchard KR, Brown MA, Hyslop WB, Firat Z, Semelka RC (2005) MRI of acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnant patients. AJR 184:452–458
Maselli G, Brunelli R, Casciani E, Polettini E, Bertini L, Laghi F et al (2011) Acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnancy: MRI as a valuable adjunct to ultrasound? Abdom Imaging 36:596–603
Oto A, Ernst RD, Ghulminyyah LM et al (2009) MR imaging in the triage of pregnant patients with acute abdominal and pelvic pain. Abdom Imaging 34:243–250
Kocher KE, Meurer WJ, Fazel R, Scott PA, Krumholz HM, Nallamothu BK (2011) National trends in use of computed tomography in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 58:452–462
Lazarus E, Mayo-Smith WW, Mainiero MB, Spencer PK (2007) CT in the evaluation of nontraumatic abdominal pain in pregnant women. Radiology 244:784–790
Cobben LP, Groot I, Haans L, Blickman JG, Puylaert J (2004) MRI for clinically suspected appendicitis during pregnancy. AJR 183:671–675
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baron, K.T., Arleo, E.K., Robinson, C. et al. Comparing the diagnostic performance of MRI versus CT in the evaluation of acute nontraumatic abdominal pain during pregnancy. Emerg Radiol 19, 519–525 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-012-1066-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-012-1066-8