Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Light and laser treatment modalities for disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis: a systematic review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Treatment of disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis (DSAP) is poorly standardized. The present review seeks to comprehensively discuss the potential for laser and light modalities in the treatment of DSAP. A systematic review of light and laser treatment modalities was conducted to include 26 cases of patients with DSAP. Systematic review resulted in 14 articles to be included. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) overall was the least successful treatment modality, with clinical improvement seen in a minority of patients (MAL-PDT: N = 9 patients, 33.3% showed improvement; ALA-PDT: N = 3 patients, 0% improvement; hypericin-PDT: N = 2 patients, 0% improvement) after numerous post-procedural side effects of hyperpigmentation, inflammation, erythema, and discomfort. Overall, in the available reports, PDT demonstrates poor outcomes with greater incidence of side effects. The response rates of DSAP lesions treated with lasers were as follows: (Q-switched ruby lasers: N = 2, 100%; CO2 laser: N = 1, 100%; PDT and CO2 combination therapy: N = 2, 0–50%; erbium and neodymium YAG lasers: N = 2, 100%; fractional 1927-nm thulium fiber lasers: N = 2, 100%; Grenz rays: N = 1, 100%; and fractional photothermolysis: N = 2, 100%). The side effects of laser therapy were minimal and included mild erythema, slight hyperpigmentation, and moderate edema. Laser therapy is a promising treatment option for DSAP with an excellent side effect profile. However, higher power studies are required to determine optimal guidelines for laser treatment of DSAP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ross NA, Rosenbaum LE, Saedi N, Arndt KA, Dover JS (2016) Disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis improved with fractional 1927-nm laser treatments. J Cosmet Laser Ther 18(1):53–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boiy A, de Witte PAM, Roelandts R (2010) Topical treatment of disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis with hypericin–photodynamic therapy: a case report. Photodiagn Photodyn Ther 7:123–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosenblum J (2013) Erbium laser for treatment of disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis. Dermatol Surg 39(10):1543–1545

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lolis MS, Marmur ES (2008) Treatment of disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis (DSAP) with the Q-switched ruby laser. J Cosmet Laser Ther 10:124–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Itoh M, Nakagawa H (2007) Successful treatment of disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis with Q-switched ruby laser. J Dermatol 34:816–820

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Salas T, Hernandez-Gil J, Lopez A, Dorado M, Ruiz J, García E, Martinez F (2016) Two cases of disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis treated with daylight-mediated photodynamic therapy. Dermatol Ther 00:1–2

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nayeemuddin FA, Wong M, Yell J, Rhodes LE (2002) Topical photodynamic therapy in disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis. Clin Exp Dermatol 27:703–706

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu HT (2000) Treatment of lichen amyloidosis (LA) and disseminated superficial porokeratosis (DSP) with frequency-doubled Q-switched Nd:YAG laser. Dermatol Surg 26(10):958–962

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim HS, Baek JH, Park YM, Kim HO, Lee JY (2011) Photodynamic therapy combined with CO2 laser vaporization on disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis: a report of 2 cases on the face. Ann Dermatol 23(2):211–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fernández-Guarino M, Harto A, Pérez-Garcia B, Martin-González M, Urrutia S, Jaén P (2009) Photodynamic therapy in disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 23:176–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cavicchini S, Tourlaki A (2006) Successful treatment of disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis with methyl aminolevulinate-photodynamic therapy. J Dermatol Treat 17:190–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Noborio R, Morita A (2011) Split-face trial of CO2 laser-induced ring abrasion and high-dose tacalcitol in the treatment of disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis. J Dermatol 39(10):879–880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chrastil B, Glaich AS, Goldberg LH, Friedman PM (2007) Fractional photothermolysis: a novel treatment for disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis. Arch Dermatol 143(11):1450–1452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ricci C, Rosset A, Panizzon RG (1999) Bullous and pruritic variant of disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis: successful treatment with Grenz rays. Dermatology 199:328–331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory A. Aird.

Ethics declarations

Funding

None.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aird, G.A., Sitenga, J.L., Nguyen, A.H. et al. Light and laser treatment modalities for disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis: a systematic review. Lasers Med Sci 32, 945–952 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2179-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2179-9

Keywords

Navigation