Skip to main content
Log in

Can we predict the outcome of 595-nm wavelength pulsed dye laser therapy on capillary vascular malformations from the first beginning: a pilot study of efficacy co-related factors in 686 Chinese patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Currently, there are no standardized, objective, and clinically applicable methods to predict the outcome of pulsed dye laser (PDL) therapy on capillary vascular malformation (CVM) patients. The introduction of a method that can predict the outcome prior to treatment will be valuable for both the patients and the doctors. In this study, the authors treated CVM with 595-nm wavelength PDL in Chinese patients (n = 686) and analyzed the efficacy of treatment and complications retrospectively in a 5-year period. Nearly 18 % of patients (n = 122) had 76 % or more clearing of lesions; over 52 % of patients (n = 360) had more than 50 % of clearing. The lesions in head and neck region had the best effective rate (58.3 %), followed by trunk (42.9 %) and extremities (35.6 %). The efficacy of PDL therapy is related to age, type, and location of lesions. Fifty-seven patients (8.3 %) had complications, including 2.0 % blistering (n = 14), 4.5 % hyperpigmentation (n = 31), 1.3 % hypopigmentation (n = 9), and 0.4 % hypertrophic scarring (n = 3). Based on these preliminary data, the authors established a standardized, objective, and clinically applicable equation that may be applied to predict the efficacy of 595 nm PDL therapy on a newly diagnosed Chinese CVM patients based on the age, type, and location of lesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mulliken JB, Glowacki J (1982) Hemangiomas and vascular malformations in infants and children: a classification based on endothelial characteristics. Plast Reconstr Surg 69(3):412–422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ernemann U, Kramer U, Miller S, Bisdas S, Rebmann H, Breuninger H, Zwick C, Hoffmann J (2010) Current concepts in the classification, diagnosis and treatment of vascular anomalies. Eur J Radiol 75(1):2–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kelly KM, Choi B, McFarlane S, Motosue A, Jung B, Khan MH, Ramirez-San-Juan JC, Nelson JS (2005) Description and analysis of treatments for port-wine stain birthmarks. Arch Facial Plast Surg 7(5):287–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shih IH, Lin JY, Chen CH, Hong HS (2007) A birthmark survey in 500 newborns: clinical observation in two northern Taiwan medical center nurseries. Chang Gung Med J 30(3):220–225

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Monteagudo B, Labandeira J, Leon-Muinos E, Carballeira I, Corrales A, Cabanillas M, Suarez-Amor O, Toribio J (2011) Prevalence of birthmarks and transient skin lesions in 1,000 Spanish newborns. Actas Dermosifiliogr 102(4):264–269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kanada KN, Merin MR, Munden A, Friedlander SF (2012) A prospective study of cutaneous findings in newborns in the United States: correlation with race, ethnicity, and gestational status using updated classification and nomenclature. J Pediatr 161(2):240–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. El-Moneim AA, El-Dawela RE (2012) Survey of skin disorders in newborns: clinical observation in an Egyptian medical centre nursery. East Mediterr Health J 18(1):49–55

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chaithirayanon S, Chunharas A (2013) A survey of birthmarks and cutaneous skin lesions in newborns. J Med Assoc Thai 96(Suppl 1):S49–S53

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marler JJ, Mulliken JB (2001) Vascular anomalies: classification, diagnosis, and natural history. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 9(4):495–504

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. van Drooge AM, de Rie M, van der Veen W, Wolkerstorfer A (2013) Port-wine stain progression: is prevention by pulsed dye laser therapy possible? Eur J Dermatol 23(2):282–283

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Troilius A, Wrangsjo B, Ljunggren B (1998) Potential psychological benefits from early treatment of port-wine stains in children. Br J Dermatol 139(1):59–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thajudheen CP, Jyothy K, Priyadarshini A (2014) Treatment of port-wine stains with flash lamp pumped pulsed dye laser on Indian skin: a six year study. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 7(1):32–36

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Anderson RR, Parrish JA (1983) Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation. Science 220(4596):524–527

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Faurschou A, Togsverd-Bo K, Zachariae C, Haedersdal M (2009) Pulsed dye laser vs. intense pulsed light for port-wine stains: a randomized side-by-side trial with blinded response evaluation. Br J Dermatol 160(2):359–364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kelly KM, Nanda VS, Nelson JS (2002) Treatment of port-wine stain birthmarks using the 1.5-msec pulsed dye laser at high fluences in conjunction with cryogen spray cooling. Dermatol Surg 28(4):309–313

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu H, Dang Y, Chai X, Wang Z, Ma L, Ren Q (2007) Treatment of port-wine stains with the 595-nm pulsed dye laser: a pilot study in Chinese patients. Clin Exp Dermatol 32(6):646–649

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Woo SH, Ahn HH, Kim SN, Kye YC (2006) Treatment of vascular skin lesions with the variable-pulse 595 nm pulsed dye laser. Dermatol Surg 32(1):41–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Savas JA, Ledon JA, Franca K, Chacon A, Nouri K (2013) Pulsed dye laser-resistant port-wine stains: mechanisms of resistance and implications for treatment. Br J Dermatol 168(5):941–953

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bernstein EF (2008) Treatment of a resistant port-wine stain with a new variable pulse-duration pulsed-dye laser. J Cosmet Dermatol 7(2):139–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Laube S, Taibjee S, Lanigan SW (2003) Treatment of resistant port wine stains with the V Beam pulsed dye laser. Lasers Surg Med 33(5):282–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lanigan SW (1998) Port-wine stains unresponsive to pulsed dye laser: explanations and solutions. Br J Dermatol 139(2):173–177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Buckmiller LM, Richter GT, Suen JY (2010) Diagnosis and management of hemangiomas and vascular malformations of the head and neck. Oral Dis 16(5):405–418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. van der Horst CM, Koster PH, de Borgie CA, Bossuyt PM, van Gemert MJ (1998) Effect of the timing of treatment of port-wine stains with the flash-lamp-pumped pulsed-dye laser. N Engl J Med 338(15):1028–1033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Goldman MP, Fitzpatrick RE, Ruiz-Esparza J (1993) Treatment of port-wine stains (capillary malformation) with the flashlamp-pumped pulsed dye laser. J Pediatr 122(1):71–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Alster TS, Tanzi EL (2009) Combined 595-nm and 1,064-nm laser irradiation of recalcitrant and hypertrophic port-wine stains in children and adults. Dermatol Surg 35(6):914–918, discussion 918–919

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Troilius A, Wrangsjo B, Ljunggren B (2000) Patients with port-wine stains and their psychosocial reactions after photothermolytic treatment. Dermatol Surg 26(3):190–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hansen K, Kreiter CD, Rosenbaum M, Whitaker DC, Arpey CJ (2003) Long-term psychological impact and perceived efficacy of pulsed-dye laser therapy for patients with port-wine stains. Dermatol Surg 29(1):49–55

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sommer S, Seukeran DC, Sheehan-Dare RA (2003) Efficacy of pulsed dye laser treatment of port wine stain malformations of the lower limb. Br J Dermatol 149(4):770–775

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Renfro L, Geronemus RG (1993) Anatomical differences of port-wine stains in response to treatment with the pulsed dye laser. Arch Dermatol 129(2):182–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wareham WJ, Cole RP, Royston SL, Wright PA (2009) Adverse effects reported in pulsed dye laser treatment for port wine stains. Lasers Med Sci 24(2):241–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shirakawa M, Ozawa T, Wakami S, Ishii M, Harada T (2012) Utility of dermoscopy before and after laser irradiation in port wine stains. Ann Dermatol 24(1):7–10

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sajan JA, Tibesar R, Jabbour N, Lander T, Hilger P, Sidman J (2013) Assessment of pulsed-dye laser therapy for pediatric cutaneous vascular anomalies. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 15(6):434–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Vazquez-Lopez F, Coto-Segura P, Fueyo-Casado A, Perez-Oliva N (2007) Dermoscopy of port-wine stains. Arch Dermatol 143(7):962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Grazzini M, Stanganelli I, Rossari S, Gori A, Oranges T, Longo AS, Lotti T, Bencini PL, De Giorgi V (2012) Dermoscopy, confocal laser microscopy, and hi-tech evaluation of vascular skin lesions: diagnostic and therapeutic perspectives. Dermatol Ther 25(4):297–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Asahina A, Watanabe T, Kishi A, Hattori N, Shirai A, Kagami S, Watanabe R, Le Pavoux A, Maekawa T, Tamaki K, Ohara K (2006) Evaluation of the treatment of port-wine stains with the 595-nm long pulsed dye laser: a large prospective study in adult Japanese patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 54(3):487–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Szychta P, Al-Nakib K, Anderson W, Stewart K, Quaba A (2013) Quantitative method for evaluation of aesthetic results after laser treatment for birthmarks. Lasers Med Sci 28(6):1567–1572

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sivarajan V, Mackay IR (2004) The depth measuring videomicroscope (DMV): a non-invasive tool for the assessment of capillary vascular malformations. Lasers Surg Med 34(2):193–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Troilius A, Svendsen G, Ljunggren B (2000) Ultrasound investigation of port wine stains. Acta Derm Venereol 80(3):196–199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare and no funding was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiangxia Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, X., Fan, Y., Huang, J. et al. Can we predict the outcome of 595-nm wavelength pulsed dye laser therapy on capillary vascular malformations from the first beginning: a pilot study of efficacy co-related factors in 686 Chinese patients. Lasers Med Sci 30, 1041–1046 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-014-1695-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-014-1695-0

Keywords

Navigation