Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Solar products for poor rural communities as a business: lessons from a successful project in Uttar Pradesh, India

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Can sales of solar products and services be a commercially viable business in poor rural communities? Although enthusiasm for off-grid electrification among researchers and practitioners is widespread, the determinants of commercial success in this domain remain poorly understood. This article reports results and lessons from a successful field project in Uttar Pradesh, India. In collaboration with a local social enterprise, Boond Engineering and Development, a small investment of USD 5000 was made to establish an energy center in the Unnao district of the state. The energy center became profitable immediately and generated seven dollars of business in solar home systems for every dollar invested during the 6-month evaluation period. Factors contributing to the success of the project included robust marketing, a strong banking partnership, the high quality of products, and continuous evaluation of staff performance. Challenges to sales of solar products included a bias in sales toward large solar home systems, the limited access to finance for poor households, and access to working capital. Overall, the energy center model holds considerable promise for alleviating energy poverty in rural India on a large scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. A randomized controlled trial on the effect of said marketing campaigns is in progress and will be completed by the end of the year 2015.

References

  • Basu RR, Banerjee PM, Sweeny EG (2013) Frugal innovation: core competencies to address global sustainability. J Manag Glob Sustain 1(2):63–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayer P, Urpelainen J, Xu A (2014) Laissez faire and the clean development mechanism: determinants of project implementation in Indian states, 2003–2011. Clean Technol Environ Policy 16(8):1687–1701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazilian M, Onyeji I, Liebreich M, MacGill I, Chase J, Shah J, Gielen D, Arent D, Landfear D, Zhengrong S (2013) Re-considering the economics of photovoltaic power. Renew Energy 53:329–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook P (2011) Infrastructure, rural electrification and development. Energy Sustain Dev 15(3):304–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinkelman T (2011) The effects of rural electrification on employment: new evidence from South Africa. Am Econ Rev 101(7):3078–3108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friebe CA, von Flotow P, Täube FA (2013) Exploring the link between products and services in low-income markets: evidence from solar home systems. Energy Policy 52:760–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of India (2011) 2011 Census Report, Houselisting and Housing Census Data Highlights. http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/hlo/hlo_highlights.html

  • Hossain FM, Hasanuzzaman M, Rahim NA, Ping HW (2014) Impact of renewable energy on rural electrification in Malaysia: a review. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17(4):859–871

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bardouille P, Avato P, Levin J, Pantelias A, Engelmann-Pilger H (2012) From gap to opportunity: business models for scaling up energy access. International Finance Corporation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Khandker SR, Barnes DF, Samad HA (2012) Are the energy poor also income poor? Evidence from India. Energy Policy 47:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khandker SR, Barnes DF, Samad HA (2013) Welfare impacts of rural electrification: a panel data analysis from Vietnam. Econ Dev Cult Change 61(3):659–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komatsu S, Kaneko S, Shrestha RM, Ghosh PP (2011) Nonincome factors behind the purchase decisions of solar home systems in rural Bangladesh. Energy Sustain Dev 15(3):284–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahapatra S, Dasappa S (2012) Rural electrification: optimising the choice between decentralised renewable energy sources and grid extension. Energy Sustain Dev 16(2):146–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palit D, Chaurey A (2011) Off-grid rural electrification experiences from South Asia: status and best practice. Energy Sustain Dev 15(3):266–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palit D, Sarangi GK, Krithika PR (2014) Energising rural India using distributed generation: the case of solar mini-grids in Chhattisgarh State, India. In: Bhattacharyya SC (ed) Mini-grids for rural electrification of developing countries. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebane KL, Barham BL (2011) Knowledge and adoption of solar home systems in rural Nicaragua. Energy Policy 39(6):3064–3075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samad HA, Khandker SR, Asaduzzaman M, Yunus M (2013) The benefits of solar home systems: an analysis from Bangladesh. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 6724

  • Shukla S, Bairiganjan S (2011) The base of pyramid distribution challenge: evaluating alternate distribution models of energy products for rural base of pyramid in India. Centre for Development Finance

  • Smith MG, Urpelainen J (2014) Early adopters of solar panels in developing countries: evidence from Tanzania. Rev Policy Res 31(1):17–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenenbaum B, Greacen C, Siyambalapitiya T, Knuckles J (2014) From the bottom up: how small power producers and mini-grids can deliver electrification and renewable energy in Africa. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Urpelainen J (2014) Grid and off-grid electrification: an integrated model with applications to India. Energy Sustain Dev 19:66–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank MORSEL India for excellent data collection. The research was funded by the Earth Institute at Columbia University under an Earth Clinic grant. We are grateful to Jonathan Balls, Harsh Singh, Rustam Sengupta, Ryan Kennedy, and Patrick Woolsey for thoughtful comments on earlier drafts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Urpelainen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Urpelainen, J., Yoon, S. Solar products for poor rural communities as a business: lessons from a successful project in Uttar Pradesh, India. Clean Techn Environ Policy 18, 617–626 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-1028-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-1028-4

Keywords

Navigation