Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tedizolid susceptibility in linezolid- and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are of ever-increasing importance, most notably in high-risk patient populations. Therapy options are often limited for these isolates, and apart from tigecycline and daptomycin, oxazolidinone linezolid is frequently administered. The broad usage of linezolid, however, has driven the emergence of linezolid-resistant VRE strains (LR-VRE), further shortening therapeutic options. Second-generation oxazolidinone tedizolid has the advantage of being active against a specific subset of LR-VRE, i.e. isolates expressing the plasmid-encoded chloramphenicol–florfenicol resistance (cfr) gene. Here we tested tedizolid activity in a collection of 30 LR Enterococcus faecium VRE (MIC range 32–256 mg/l) isolated between 2012 and 2015 from clinical and screening specimens. By pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) isolates were assigned to 16 clonal lineages. In three cases, linezolid-susceptible progenitor isolates of LR-VRE were isolated, thus demonstrating the de-novo emergence of the linezolid-resistant phenotype. PCR did not detect cfr, cfr(B) or novel oxazolidinone resistance gene optrA in LR-VRE. All isolates, however, carried mutations within the 23S rDNA. Compared to linezolid, tedizolid MICs were lower in all isolates (MIC range 2–32 mg/l), but remained above the FDA tedizolid breakpoint for E. faecalis at 0.5 mg/l. Thus, related to the predominant resistance mechanism, tedizolid is of limited value for treatment of most LR-VRE and represents a therapeutic option only for a limited subset of isolates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arias CA, Murray BE (2012) The rise of the Enterococcus: beyond vancomycin resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol 10(4):266–278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Gastmeier P, Schröder C, Behnke M, Meyer E, Geffers C (2014) Dramatic increase in vancomycin-resistant enterococci in Germany. J Antimicrob Chemother 69(6):1660–1664

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Balli EP, Venetis CA, Miyakis S (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of linezolid versus daptomycin for treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58(2):734–739

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Saager B, Rohde H, Timmerbeil BS, Franke G, Pothmann W, Dahlke J et al (2008) Molecular characterisation of linezolid resistance in two vancomycin-resistant (VanB) Enterococcus faecium isolates using Pyrosequencing. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 27(9):873–878

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu Y, Wang Y, Wu C, Shen Z, Schwarz S, Du XD et al (2012) First report of the multidrug resistance gene cfr in Enterococcus faecalis of animal origin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56(3):1650–1654

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu Y, Wang Y, Schwarz S, Li Y, Shen Z, Zhang Q et al (2013) Transferable multiresistance plasmids carrying cfr in Enterococcus spp. from swine and farm environment. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57(1):42–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Deshpande LM, Ashcraft DS, Kahn HP, Pankey G, Jones RN, Farrell DJ et al (2015) Detection of a new cfr-like gene, cfr(B), in Enterococcus faecium isolates recovered from human specimens in the United States as part of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59(10):6256–6261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Cai J, Wang Y, Schwarz S, Lv H, Li Y, Liao K et al (2015) Enterococcal isolates carrying the novel oxazolidinone resistance gene optrA from hospitals in Zhejiang, Guangdong, and Henan, China, 2010-2014. Clin Microbiol Infect 21(12):1095.e4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang Y, Lv Y, Cai J, Schwarz S, Cui L, Hu Z et al (2015) A novel gene, optrA, that confers transferable resistance to oxazolidinones and phenicols and its presence in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium of human and animal origin. J Antimicrob Chemother 70(8):2182–2190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rybak JM, Roberts K (2015) Tedizolid phosphate: a next-generation oxazolidinone. Infect Dis Ther 4(1):1–14. doi:10.1007/s40121-015-0060-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Barber KE, Smith JR, Raut A, Rybak MJ (2016) Evaluation of tedizolid against Staphylococcus aureus and enterococci with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin, daptomycin or linezolid. J Antimicrob Chemother 71(1):152–155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kehrenberg C, Schwarz S (2006) Distribution of florfenicol resistance genes fexA and cfr among chloramphenicol-resistant Staphylococcus isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50(4):1156–1163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ruggero KA, Schroeder LK, Schreckenberger PC, Mankin AS, Quinn JP (2003) Nosocomial superinfections due to linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecalis: evidence for a gene dosage effect on linezolid MICs. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 47(3):511–513

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Elsner HA, Sobottka I, Feucht HH, Harps E, Haun C, Mack D et al (2000) Nosocomial outbreak of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium at a German university pediatric hospital. Int J Hyg Environ Health 203(2):147–152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tenover FC, Arbeit RD, Goering RV, Mickelsen PA, Murray BE, Persing DH et al (1995) Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol 33(9):2233–2239

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Sahm DF, Deane J, Bien PA, Locke JB, Zuill DE, Shaw KJ et al (2015) Results of the surveillance of Tedizolid activity and resistance program: in vitro susceptibility of gram-positive pathogens collected in 2011 and 2012 from the United States and Europe. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 81(2):112–118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Eliopoulos GM, Wennersten CB, Gold HS, Moellering RC Jr (1996) In vitro activities in new oxazolidinone antimicrobial agents against enterococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 40(7):1745–1747

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Patel R, Rouse MS, Piper KE, Steckelberg JM (1999) In vitro activity of linezolid against vancomycin-resistant enterococci, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 34(2):119–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chien JW, Kucia ML, Salata RA (2000) Use of linezolid, an oxazolidinone, in the treatment of multidrug-resistant gram-positive bacterial infections. Clin Infect Dis 30(1):146–151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gonzales RD, Schreckenberger PC, Graham MB, Kelkar S, DenBesten K, Quinn JP (2001) Infections due to vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium resistant to linezolid. Lancet 357(9263):1179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Prystowsky J, Siddiqui F, Chosay J, Shinabarger DL, Millichap J, Peterson LR et al (2001) Resistance to linezolid: characterization of mutations in rRNA and comparison of their occurrences in vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45(7):2154–2156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Dobbs TE, Patel M, Waites KB, Moser SA, Stamm AM, Hoesley CJ (2006) Nosocomial spread of Enterococcus faecium resistant to vancomycin and linezolid in a tertiary care medical center. J Clin Microbiol 44(9):3368–3370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kainer MA, Devasia RA, Jones TF, Simmons BP, Melton K, Chow S et al (2007) Response to emerging infection leading to outbreak of linezolid-resistant enterococci. Emerg Infect Dis 13(7):1024–1030

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Souli M, Sakka V, Galani I, Antoniadou A, Galani L, Siafakas N et al (2009) Colonisation with vancomycin- and linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecium in a university hospital: molecular epidemiology and risk factor analysis. Int J Antimicrob Agents 33(2):137–142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Herrero IA, Issa NC, Patel R (2002) Nosocomial spread of linezolid-resistant, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. N Engl J Med 346(11):867–869

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bourgeois-Nicolaos N, Nguyen TT, Defrance G, Massias L, Alavoine L, Lefort A et al (2014) The emergence of linezolid resistance among Enterococci in intestinal microbiota of treated patients is unrelated to individual pharmacokinetic characteristics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58(5):2681–2687

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Bourgeois-Nicolaos N, Massias L, Couson B, Butel MJ, Andremont A, Doucet-Populaire F (2007) Dose dependence of emergence of resistance to linezolid in Enterococcus faecalis in vivo. J Infect Dis 195(10):1480–1488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Besier S, Ludwig A, Zander J, Brade V, Wichelhaus TA (2008) Linezolid resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: gene dosage effect, stability, fitness costs, and cross-resistances. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52(4):1570–1572

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Marshall SH, Donskey CJ, Hutton-Thomas R, Salata RA, Rice LB (2002) Gene dosage and linezolid resistance in Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46(10):3334–3336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. He T, Shen Y, Schwarz S, Cai J, Lv Y, Li J et al (2016) Genetic environment of the transferable oxazolidinone/phenicol resistance gene optrA in Enterococcus faecalis isolates of human and animal origin. J Antimicrob Chemother. doi:10.1093/jac/dkw016

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zurenko G, Bien P, Bensaci M, Patel HN, Thorne G (2014) Use of linezolid susceptibility test results as a surrogate for the susceptibility of Gram-positive pathogens to tedizolid, a novel oxazolidinone. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 13:46. doi:10.1186/s12941-014-0046-0.:46-0046

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Fiedler S, Bender JK, Klare I, Halbedel S, Grohmann E, Szewzyk U et al (2016) Tigecycline resistance in clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecium is mediated by an upregulation of plasmid-encoded tetracycline determinants tet(L) and tet(M). J Antimicrob Chemother 71(4):871–881

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lellek H, Franke GC, Ruckert C, Wolters M, Wolschke C, Christner M et al (2015) Emergence of daptomycin non-susceptibility in colonizing vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates during daptomycin therapy. Int J Med Microbiol 305(8):902–909

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Locke JB, Zurenko GE, Shaw KJ, Bartizal K (2014) Tedizolid for the management of human infections: in vitro characteristics. Clin Infect Dis 58(Suppl 1):S35–S42. doi:10.1093/cid/cit616.:S35-S42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Shaw KJ, Poppe S, Schaadt R, Brown-Driver V, Finn J, Pillar CM et al (2008) In vitro activity of TR-700, the antibacterial moiety of the prodrug TR-701, against linezolid-resistant strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52(12):4442–4447

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Virologie und Hygiene, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany

      E.-M. Klupp, A. Both, C. Belmar Campos, H. Büttner, M. Christner, M. Aepfelbacher & H. Rohde

    2. Klinikapotheke, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany

      C. König

    3. Klinik für Stammzelltransplantation, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany

      M. Christopeit

    Authors
    1. E.-M. Klupp
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. A. Both
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. C. Belmar Campos
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. H. Büttner
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. C. König
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. M. Christopeit
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. M. Christner
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    8. M. Aepfelbacher
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    9. H. Rohde
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to H. Rohde.

    Ethics declarations

    Funding

    MSD partially provided reagents used in this study.

    Conflict of interest

    None to declare.

    Ethical approval/informed consent

    Not applicable.

    Additional information

    E.-M. Klupp and A. Both contributed equally to this work.

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Klupp, EM., Both, A., Belmar Campos, C. et al. Tedizolid susceptibility in linezolid- and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 35, 1957–1961 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2747-0

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • Issue Date:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2747-0

    Keywords

    Search

    Navigation