Skip to main content
Log in

Does effort influence inequity aversion in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus)?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The human sense of fairness entails sensitivity not just to equality, the equal division of resources, but also to merit, the relationship between an individual’s share of resources and how hard they worked for their share. Recent evidence suggests that our sensitivity to equality has deep phylogenetic roots: several nonhuman animal species show an aversion to unequal reward distributions. However, the extent to which nonhuman animals share sensitivity to merit remains poorly understood, largely because previous studies have failed to properly manipulate work effort in inequity aversion tasks. Here, we tested whether cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) would exhibit a differential response to inequity when acquiring rewards was either (1) effortful or (2) effortless. Subjects engaged in a pulling task in which they had an opportunity to deliver a disadvantageously unequal distribution of food to themselves and a partner (one piece for self, four pieces for partner). We made delivery effortful by adding a weight to the pulling handle. Critically, effort was calibrated to each individual. Results show that individuals varied markedly in their response to effort, highlighting the importance of manipulating work effort at the individual level. Overall, subjects showed little aversion to inequity. However, subjects were slightly less likely to accept inequity when doing so was effortful, although this effect was pronounced in only one individual. Our findings suggest a new method for capturing individual variation in effort and for studying the roots of the concept of merit in nonhuman animals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams JS (1965) Inequity in social exchange. In: Berkowitz L (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 2. Academic Press, New York, pp 267–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B (2012) Package ‘lme4’. http://cran.stat.sfu.ca/web/packages/lme4/lme4.pdf

  • Baumard N, Mascaro O, Chevallier C (2012) Preschoolers are able to take merit into account when distributing goods. Dev Psychol 48:492–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benenson J, Pascoe J, Radmore N (2007) Children’s altruistic behavior in the dictator game. Evol Hum Behav 28:168–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake PR, McAuliffe K (2011) “I had so much it didn’t seem fair”: eight-year-olds reject two forms of inequity. Cognition 120:215–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH et al (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24:127–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bräuer J, Call J, Tomasello M (2006) Are apes really inequity averse? Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 273:3123–3128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bräuer J, Call J, Tomasello M (2009) Are apes inequity averse? New data on the token-exchange paradigm. Am J Primatol 71:175–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan SF (2006) Nonhuman species’ reactions to inequity and their implications for fairness. Soc Justice Res 19:153–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan SF (2011) A hypothesis of the co-evolution of cooperation and responses to inequity. Front Neurosci 5:43

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan SF, de Waal FBM (2003) Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature 425:297–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan SF, Schiff HC, de Waal FBM (2005) Tolerance for inequity may increase with social closeness in chimpanzees. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 272:253–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan SF, Talbot C, Ahlgren M, Lambeth SP, Schapiro SJ (2010) Mechanisms underlying responses to inequitable outcomes in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes. Anim Behav 79:1229–1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan SF, Flemming T, Talbot CF, Mayo L, Stoinski T (2011) Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) do not form expectations based on their partner’s outcomes. Folia Primatol 82:56–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burkart JM, van Schaik CP (2010) Cognitive consequences of cooperative breeding in primates? Anim Cogn 13:1–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burkart JM, Fehr E, Efferson C, van Schaik CP (2007) Other-regarding preferences in a non-human primate: common marmosets provision food altruistically. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:19762–19766

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Burkart JM, Hrdy SB, Van Schaik CP (2009) Cooperative breeding and human cognitive evolution. Evol Anthropol 18:175–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer C (2003) Behavioral game theory: experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin KA, Snowdon CT (2008) The effects of unequal reward distributions on cooperative problem solving by cottontop tamarins, Saguinus oedipus. Anim Behav 75:245–257

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin KA, Schroeder KKE, Rothwell ES, Silk JB, Snowdon CT (2009) Cooperatively breeding cottontop tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) do not donate rewards to their long-term mates. J Comp Psychol 123:231–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Damon W (1977) The social world of the child. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes CT, Fowler JH, Johnson T, McElreath R, Smirnov O (2007) Egalitarian motives in humans. Nature 446:794–796

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Waal FBM, Berger ML (2000) Payment for labour in monkeys. Nature 404:563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dindo M, de Waal FBM (2007) Partner effects on food consumption in brown capuchin monkeys. Am J Primatol 69:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q J Econ 114:817–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E, Bernhard H, Rockenbach B (2008) Egalitarianism in young children. Nature 454:1079–1083

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher GE (2008) Attending to the outcome of others: disadvantageous inequity aversion in male capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Am J Primatol 70:901–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman HD, Sullivan J, Hopper LM, Talbot CF, Holmes AN, Schultz-Darken N, Williams LE, Brosnan SF (2013) Different responses to reward comparisons by three primate species. PLoS ONE 8:e76297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Güth W, Schmittberger R, Schwartze B (1982) An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J Econ Behav Organ 3:367–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser MD, Chen MK, Chen F, Chuang E (2003) Give unto others: genetically unrelated cotton-top tamarins monkeys preferentially give food to those who altruistically give food back. Proc Roy Soc B Biol Sci 270:2363–2370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich J (2004) Inequity aversion in capuchins? Nature 428:139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich J, Boyd R, Bowles S, Camerer C, Fehr E, Gintis H, et al. (2005) “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behav Brain Sci 28:795–815; discussion 815–755

  • Hook JG, Cook TD (1979) Equity theory and the cognitive-ability of children. Psychol Bull 86:429–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopper LM, Lambeth SP, Schapiro SJ, Bernacky BJ, Brosnan SF (2013) The ontogeny of social comparisons in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). J Primatol 2:109

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz A (2012) Fair is fine, but more is better: limits to inequity aversion in the domestic dog. Soc Justice Res 25:195–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J 50:346–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen K, Call J, Tomasello M (2007) Chimpanzees are rational maximizers in an ultimatum game. Science 318:107–109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kanngiesser P, Warneken F (2012) Young children consider merit when sharing resources with others. Plos One 7(8):e43979

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lakshminarayanan V, Santos LR (2008) Capuchin monkeys are sensitive to others’ welfare. Curr Biol 18:R999–R1000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein GF, Thompson L, Bazerman MH (1989) Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts. J Pers Soc Psychol 57:426–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massen JJM, van den Berg LM, Spruijt BM, Sterck EHM (2012) Inequity aversion in relation to effort and relationship quality in long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Am J Primatol 74:145–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mendres KA, de Waal FBM (2000) Capuchins do cooperate: the advantage of an intuitive task. Anim Behav 60:523–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neiworth JJ, Johnson ET, Whillock K, Greenberg J, Brown V (2009) Is a sense of inequity an ancestral primate trait? Testing social inequity in cotton top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). J Comp Psychol 123:10–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piovesan M, Wengstrom E (2009) Fast or fair? A study of response times. Econ Lett 105:193–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor D, Williamson RA, de Waal FBM, Brosnan SF (2013) Chimpanzees play the ultimatum game. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:2070–2075

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Raihani NJ, McAuliffe K (2012) Human punishment is motivated by inequity aversion, not a desire for reciprocity. Biol Lett 8:802–804

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Raihani NJ, McAuliffe K, Brosnan SF, Bshary R (2012) Are cleaner fish, Labroides dimidiatus, inequity averse? Anim Behav 84:665–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rand DG, Greene JD, Nowak MA (2012) Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature 489:427–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Range F, Horn L, Viranyi Z, Huber L (2009) The absence of reward induces inequity aversion in dogs. P Natl Acad Sci USA 106:340–345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Range F, Leitner K, Viranyi Z (2012) The influence of the relationship and motivation on inequity aversion in dogs. Soc J Res 25:170–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts G (2005) Cooperation through interdependence. Anim Behav 70:901–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roma PG, Silberberg A, Ruggiero AM, Suomi SJ (2006) Capuchin monkeys, inequity aversion, and the frustration effect. J Comp Psychol 120:67–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanfey AG, Rilling JK, Aronson JA, Nystrom LE, Cohen JD (2003) The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game. Science 300:1755–1758

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silberberg A, Roma PG, Ruggiero AM, Suomi SJ (2006) On inequity aversion in nonhuman primates. J Comp Psychol 120:76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silberberg A, Crescimbene L, Addessi E, Anderson JR, Visalberghi E (2009) Does inequity aversion depend on a frustration effect? A test with capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Anim Cogn 12:505–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sloane S, Baillargeon R, Premack D (2012) Do infants have a sense of fairness? Psychol Sci 23:196–204

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P, Silberberg A (2010) Rational maximizing by humans (Homo sapiens) in an ultimatum game. Anim Cogn 13:671–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snowdon CT (1996) Parental care in cooperatively breeding species. In: Rosenblatt JS, Snowdon CT (eds) Parental care: evolution, mechanisms and adaptations. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 643–689

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens JR (2010) Donor payoffs and other-regarding preferences in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Anim Cogn 13:663–670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens JR, Hallinan EV, Hauser MD (2005a) The ecology and evolution of patience in two New World monkeys. Biol Lett 1:223–226

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens J, Rosati A, Ross K, Hauser MD (2005b) Will travel for food: spatial discounting in two new world monkeys. Curr Biol 15:1855–1860

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens J, Wood J, Hauser M (2007) When quantity trumps number: discrimination experiments in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) and common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Anim Cogn 10:429–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Takimoto A, Fujita K (2011) I acknowledge your help: capuchin monkeys’ sensitivity to others’ labor. Anim Cogn 14:715–725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Takimoto A, Kuroshima H, Fujita K (2010) Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) are sensitive to others’ reward: an experimental analysis of food-choice for conspecifics. Anim Cogn 13:249–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Talbot CF, Freeman HD, Williams LE, Brosnan SF (2011) Squirrel monkeys’ response to inequitable outcomes indicates a behavioural convergence within the primates. Biol Lett 7:680–682

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org

  • Thornton A, Lukas D (2012) Individual variation in cognitive performance: developmental and evolutionary perspectives. Phil Trans R Soc B 367:2773–2783

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • van Wolkenten M, Brosnan SF, de Waal FBM (2007) Inequity responses of monkeys modified by effort. P Natl Acad Sci USA 104:18854–18859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wascher CAF, Bugnyar T (2013) Behavioral responses to inequity in reward distribution and working effort in crows and ravens. PLoS ONE 8:e56885

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne CDL (2004) Fair refusal by capuchin monkeys. Nature 428:140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Kyle Foreman for building the testing apparatus. We thank Jessie Baker, Sarah Bayefsky, Alexandra Kass, Nick López, Clarissa Scholes, Sargent Shriver, Zachary Sulkowski and Courtney Taylor for their help with this study. Thanks also to Marc Hauser for his help designing this experiment. We are grateful to Richard Wrangham, Laurie Santos, Alex Thornton, Kristin Leimgruber and two anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katherine McAuliffe.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 319 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McAuliffe, K., Shelton, N. & Stone, L. Does effort influence inequity aversion in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus)?. Anim Cogn 17, 1289–1301 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-014-0764-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-014-0764-x

Keywords

Navigation