Abstract
Objective
Previous studies of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound (US) and dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in patients with gout have reported different results. The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic value of US and DECT in patients with different stages of acute gouty arthritis.
Methods
Based on the presence of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals in the synovial fluid, patients (n = 37) were divided into three groups according to gout duration: early stage (within 1 year, n = 15), middle stage (1 to 3 years, n = 12), and late stage (more than 3 years, n = 10). All the affected joints were examined by US and DECT.
Results
In the early-stage group, the sensitivity of US was significantly higher than DECT in identifying MSU deposition (66.7% vs 26.6%, p < 0.05), while in the middle- and late-stage groups, the sensitivity of US and DECT was similar. In the early-stage group, the US results in nine joints were positive (four with double contour sign, four with snowstorm sign, and one with both double contour sign and snowstorm sign), while DECT did not show any urate crystal deposits.
Conclusion
These findings indicate that US should be the first choice for acute gouty arthritis, especially in patients with early-stage disease.
Key Points • Previous studies have compared DECT with US to evaluate the reliability of each method in diagnosing gout but have reported different results, which may be partly due to different gout duration. • In our study, the sensitivity of US was significantly higher than DECT in identifying MSU deposition in the early-stage group, while in the middle- and late-stage groups, the sensitivity of US and DECT was similar. • US should be the first choice for the diagnosis of acute gouty arthritis, especially in patients with early-stage disease. |
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brook RA, Forsythe A, Smeeding JE, Lawrence Edwards N (2010) Chronic gout: epidemiology, disease progression, treatment and disease burden. Curr Med Res Opin 26:2813–2821
Zhang W, Doherty M, Pascual E, Bardin T, Barskova V, Conaghan P, Gerster J, Jacobs J, Leeb B, Lioté F, McCarthy G, Netter P, Nuki G, Perez-Ruiz F, Pignone A, Pimentão J, Punzi L, Roddy E, Uhlig T, Zimmermann-Gòrska I, EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (2006) EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout. part I: diagnosis. Report of a task force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 65:1301–1311
Gamala M, Jacobs JWG, Linn-Rasker SF et al (2019) The performance of dual-energy CT in the classification criteria of gout: a prospective study in subjects with unclassified arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford):2019
Schueller-Weidekamm C, Schueller G, Aringer M, Weber M, Kainberger F (2007) Impact of sonography in gouty arthritis: comparison with conventional radiography, clinical examination, and laboratory findings. Eur J Radiol 62:437–443
Choi HK, Burns LC, Shojania K, Koenig N, Reid G, Abufayyah M, Law G, Kydd AS, Ouellette H, Nicolaou S (2012) Dual energy CT in gout: a prospective validation study. Ann Rheum Dis 71:1466–1471
Dalbeth N, Choi HK (2013) Dual-energy computed tomography for gout diagnosis and management. Curr Rheumatol Rep 15:301
Neogi T, Jansen TL, Dalbeth N, Fransen J, Schumacher HR, Berendsen D, Brown M, Choi H, Edwards NL, Janssens HJ, Lioté F, Naden RP, Nuki G, Ogdie A, Perez-Ruiz F, Saag K, Singh JA, Sundy JS, Tausche AK, Vaquez-Mellado J, Yarows SA, Taylor WJ (2015) 2015 gout classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 74:1789–1798
Gruber M, Bodner G, Rath E, Supp G, Weber M, Schueller-Weidekamm C (2014) Dual-energy computed tomography compared with ultrasound in the diagnosis of gout. Rheumatology (Oxford) 53:173–179
Huppertz A, Hermann KG, Diekhoff T, Wagner M, Hamm B, Schmidt WA (2014) Systemic staging for urate crystal deposits with dual-energy CT and ultrasound in patients with suspected gout. Rheumatol Int 34:763–771
Zhu L, Wu H, Wu X, Sun W, Zhang T, Ye L, Wang W, Wang J (2015) Comparison between dual-energy computed tomography and ultrasound in the diagnosis of gout of various joints. Acad Radiol 22:1497–1502
Mader R (1998) Repeated synovial fluid analysis may be needed to find crystals in gout. Clin Rheumatol 17:549–550
Lawry GV 2nd, Fan TP, Bluestone R (1988) Polyarticular versus monoarticular gout: a prospective analysis of clinical features. Medicine (Baltimore) 67:335–342
Pascual E, Sivera F, Andrés M (2011) Synovial fluid analysis for crystals. Curr Opin Rheumatol 23:161–169
Swan AAH, Dieppe P (2002) The value of synovial fluid assays in the diagnosis of joint disease: a literature survey. Ann Rheum Dis:493–498
Ogdie A, Taylor WJ, Weatherall M et al (2015) Imaging modalities for the classification of gout: systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis 74:1868–1874
Grassi W, Okano T, Filippucci E (2015) Use of ultrasound for diagnosis and monitoring of outcomes in crystal arthropathies. Curr Opin Rheumatol 27:147–155
Glazebrook KN, Guimaraes LS, Murthy NS et al (2011) Identification of intraarticular and periarticular uric acid crystals with dual-energy CT: initial evaluation. Radiology 261:516–524
Bongartz T, Glazebrook KN, Kavros SJ et al (2015) Dual-energy CT for the diagnosis of gout: an accuracy and diagnostic yield study. Ann Rheum Dis 74:1072–1077
Wang Y, Deng X, Xu Y et al (2018) Detection of uric acid crystal deposition by ultrasonography and dual-energy computed tomography: a cross-sectional study in patients with clinically diagnosed gout. Medicine (Baltimore) 97:e12834
Ogdie A, Taylor WJ, Neogi T et al (2017) Performance of ultrasound in the diagnosis of gout in a multicenter study: comparison with monosodium urate monohydrate crystal analysis as the gold standard. Arthritis Rheumatol 69:429–438
Funding
This study was partly supported by the grants from the National Science Foundation of Zhejiang (LY19H100002).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
None.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, B., Yang, M. & Wang, H. Diagnostic value of ultrasound versus dual-energy computed tomography in patients with different stages of acute gouty arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 39, 1649–1653 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-020-05014-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-020-05014-6