Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Health literacy in patients dealing with gout: a qualitative study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to explore the health literacy of patients dealing with gout and to understand perceptions that might account for non-adherence to urate-lowering therapy (ULT). Semi-structured interviews involving patients with gout were conducted. The transcripts of the interviews were scored by two readers and a coding system to categorize the data was developed. Fifteen patients (14 men, mean age 63 years, mean disease duration 11 years) were interviewed; ten patients were recruited from secondary care and five from primary care. Six patients had gout tophi and 12 patients used ULT. Less than half of the patients were sufficiently aware of the pathophysiological processes that cause gout. Twelve patients indicated that treatment of gout only encompasses treatment of the acute attack. Patients were unaware of long-term treatment goals. Six patients admitted medication non-adherence at some point in time. Several reasons for non-adherence, such as healthcare professionals providing conflicting messages about medication, can be considered preventable. Half of the patients expressed that they, especially at the time of diagnosis, wanted to know more about the cause of gout, treatment goals and long-term consequences. In conclusion, the health literacy of patients dealing with gout was low in our study, especially with regard to medication. Yet, patients often recognized these knowledge gaps. Our data suggest that improving knowledge and addressing common misperceptions in training programmes, may ultimately contribute to adherence to ULT and an optimized outcome in patients with gout. This hypothesis needs to be confirmed in future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mikuls TR, Farrar JT, Bilker WB, Fernandes S, Schumacher HR Jr, Saag KG (2005) Gout epidemiology: results from the UK General Practice Research Database, 1990–1999. Ann Rheum Dis 64:267–272

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Neogi T (2011) Clinical practice. Gout. N Engl J Med 364:443–452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Spencer K, Carr A, Doherty M (2012) Patient and provider barriers to effective management of gout in general practice: a qualitative study. Ann Rheum Dis 71:1490–1495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. De Vera MA, Marcotte G, Rai S, Galo JS, Bhole V (2014) Medication adherence in gout: a systematic review. Arthritis Care Res. doi:10.1002/acr.22336

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Vries H, Mudde A, Kremers S, Charlton A, Vartiainen E, Buijs G, Clemente P, Storm H, Gonzalez Navarro A, Nebot M, Prinsen T (2003) The European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach (ESFA): an example of integral prevention. Health Educ Res 18:611–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pope C, Mays N (2006) Qualitative research in health care. Blackwell Publishing

  7. Zhang W, Doherty M, Bardin T, Pascual E, Barskova V, Conaghan P, Gerster J, Jacobs J, Leeb B, Lioté F, McCarthy G, Netter P, Nuki G, Perez-Ruiz F, Pignone A, Pimentão J, Punzi L, Roddy E, Uhlig T, Zimmermann-Gòrska I. EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout (2006). Part II: Management. Report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 65:1312–24

  8. Nutbeam D (2008) The evolving concept of health literacy. Soc Sci Med 67:2072–2078

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lindsay K, Gow P, Vanderpyl J, Logo P, Dalbeth N (2011) The experience and impact of living with gout: a study of men with chronic gout using a qualitative grounded theory approach. J Clin Rheumatol 17:1–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zedler BK, Kakad P, Colilla S, Murrelle L, Shah NR (2011) Does packaging with a calendar feature improve adherence to self-administered medication for long-term use? A systematic review. Clin Ther 33:62–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang HY, Maguire MG, Miller ER 3rd, Appel LJ (2000) Impact of pill organizers and blister packs on adherence to pill taking in two vitamin supplementation trials. Am J Epidemiol 152:780–787

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gabriel SE, Normand SL (2012) Getting the methods right—the foundation of patient-centered outcomes research. N Engl J Med 367:787–790

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lim AY, Shen L, Tan CH, Lateef A, Lau TC, Teng GG (2012) Achieving treat to target in gout: a clinical practice improvement project. Scand J Rheumatol 41:450–457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mikuls TR, Farrar JT, Bilker WB, Fernandes S, Saag KG (2005) Suboptimal physician adherence to quality indicators for the management of gout and asymptomatic hyperuricaemia: results from the UK General Practice Research Database (GPRD). Rheumatology (Oxford) 44:1038–1042

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marloes van Onna.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van Onna, M., Hinsenveld, E., de Vries, H. et al. Health literacy in patients dealing with gout: a qualitative study. Clin Rheumatol 34, 1599–1603 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-014-2838-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-014-2838-1

Keywords

Navigation