Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Henoch–Schönlein purpura in childhood: treatment and prognosis. Analysis of 425 cases over a 5-year period

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify the most effective treatment by evaluating the different therapies used to treat mild, moderate, and severe Henoch–Schönlein purpura (HSP) patients. We performed a retrospective study of children discharged with a diagnosis of HSP. The study group consisted of 425 children divided into mild, moderate, and severe condition groups. Different therapeutic protocols of hydrocortisone sodium succinate (HCSS) therapy, methylprednisolone (MP) pulse therapy, and MP combination with tripterygium glycoside (TG) therapy were used to treat the different groups. The evaluation of curative effect was performed. After 4 weeks, all patients with no obvious recovery were treated by strengthening the different treatment intervention. The remission time of skin, joint, and gastrointestinal manifestations was evaluated, and the results of the follow-up were analyzed (remission time of proteinuria, relapse, and side effects of therapy). After 4 weeks, in the mild group, the difference of the curative effect between HCSS and MP therapy was not statistically significant. Moderate HSP patients were more likely to respond to MP therapy than HCSS therapy (P < 0.05). Severe HSP patients were more likely to respond to MP combination with TG than single MP therapy (P < 0.05). At last follow-up, they all had normal urinalysis. In the moderate HSP group, the mean duration of proteinuria was shorter in the MP pulse therapy group than in the HCSS therapy group (P < 0.05). In the mild group, the mean duration of purpura was shorter in HCSS therapy group than in the MP pulse therapy group (P < 0.05). At last follow-up, 99 patients had recurrences of purpura and/or proteinuria and 41 patients had liver functional impairment and/or hypertension. The relapse and side effects were all satisfactorily controlled, and the rates of relapse and side effects did not differ between groups with different therapies (P > 0.05). Our study has demonstrated a superior effect for HCSS therapy in patients with mild HSP disease, for MP therapy in patients with moderate disease, and for MP combined with TG therapy in patients with severe disease. MP therapy administered initially reduces the duration of urinary protein abnormality. The therapeutic protocols did not increase the risk of relapse and were safe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saulsbury FT (2001) Henoch–Schönlein purpura. Curr Opin Rheumatol 13:35–40

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Heberden W (1801) Commertarii de Malbaun. Historia et curatione, Payne, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schönlein JL (1837) Allgemenie und specielle Pathologie und Therapie, vol 2, 3rd edn. Herisau, Wurzburg

    Google Scholar 

  4. Henoch EH (1874) Uber eine eigentumliche Form von Purpura. Berliner Klinische Wochenschrift 2:641–643

    Google Scholar 

  5. Henoch EH (1895) Vorlesungen uber Kinderkrankheiten. Hirschwald, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  6. Szer IS (2002) Henoch Schönlein purpura. Curr Opin Rheumatol 6:25–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ronkainen J, Nuutinen M, Koskimies O (2002) The adult kidney 24 years after childhood Henoch–Schönlein purpura: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 360:666–670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ronkainen J, Ala-Houhala M, Huttunen NP et al (2003) Outcome of Henoch–Schönlein nephritis with nephrotic-range proteinuria. Clin Nephrol 60:80–84

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldstein AR, White RH, Akuse R et al (1992) Long-term follow-up of childhood Henoch–Schönlein nephritis. Lancet 339:280–282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ozen S, Ruperto N, Dillon MJ et al (2006) EULAR/PReS endorsed consensus criteria for the classification of childhood vasculitides. Ann Rheum Dis 65:936–941

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Peru H, Soylemezoglu O, Bakkaloglu SA et al (2008) Henoch Schönlein purpura in childhood: clinical analysis of 254 cases over a 3-year period. Clin Rheumatol 27:1087–1092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Trapani S, Micheli A, Grisolia F et al (2005) Henoch Schönlein purpura in childhood: epidemiological and clinical analysis of 150 cases over a 5-year period and review of literature. Semin Arthritis Rheum 35:143–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chartapisak W, Opastiraku SL, Willis NS et al (2009) Prevention and treatment of renal disease in Henoch–Schönlein purpura: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child 94:132–137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Weiss PF, Feinstein JA, Luan X et al (2007) Effects of corticosteroid on Henoch–Schönlein purpura: a systematic review. Pediatrics 120:1079–1087

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ronkainen J, Koskimies O, Ala-Houhala M et al (2006) Early prednisone therapy in Henoch–Schönlein purpura: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Pediatr 149:241–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Foster BJ, Bernard C, Drummond KN et al (2000) Effective therapy for severe Henoch–Schönlein purpura nephritis with prednisone and azathioprine: a clinical and histopathologic study. J Pediatr 136:370–375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Niaudet P, Habib R (1998) Methylprednisolone pulse therapy in the treatment of severe forms of Schönlein–Henoch purpura nephritis. Pediatr Nephrol 12:238–243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shin JI, Park JM, Shin YH et al (2005) Can azathioprine and steroids alter the progression of severe Henoch–Schönlein nephritis in children? Pediatr Nephrol 20:1087–1092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shenoy M, Bradbury MG, Lewis MA et al (2007) Outcome of Henoch–Schönlein purpura nephritis treated with long-term immunosuppression. Pediatr Nephrol 22:1717–1722

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tanaka H, Suzuki K, Nakahata T et al (2003) Early treatment with oral immunosuppressants in severe proteinuric purpura nephritis. Pediatr Nephrol 18:347–350

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zheng CX, Chen ZH, Zeng CH et al (2008) Triptolide protects podocytes from puromycin aminonucleoside induced injury in vivo and in vitro. Kidney Int 74:596–612

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Butani L, Morgenstern BZ (2007) Long-term outcome in children after Henoch–Schönlein purpura nephritis. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 46:505–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tarshish P, Bernstein J, Edelmann CM Jr (2004) Henoch–Schönlein purpura nephritis: course of disease and efficacy of cyclophosphamide. Pediatr Nephrol 19:51–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Saulsbury FT (1999) Henoch–Schönlein purpura in children. Report of 100 patients and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 78:395–409

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Calviño MC, Llorca J, García-Porrúa C et al (2001) Henoch–Schönlein purpura in children from northwestern Spain: a 20-year epidemiologic and clinical study. Medicine (Baltimore) 80:279–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hari P, Bagga A, Jindal N et al (2001) Treatment of focal glomerulosclerosis with pulse steroids and oral cyclophosphamide. Pediatr Nephrol 16:901–905

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ling Lu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deng, F., Lu, L., Zhang, Q. et al. Henoch–Schönlein purpura in childhood: treatment and prognosis. Analysis of 425 cases over a 5-year period. Clin Rheumatol 29, 369–374 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-009-1329-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-009-1329-2

Keywords

Navigation