Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of subcutaneous and intravenous continuous glucose monitoring accuracy in an operating room and an intensive care unit

  • Original Article
  • Artificial Liver, Pancreas
  • Published:
Journal of Artificial Organs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although we have used an intravenous continuous glucose monitor for blood glucose management, a previous study reported that a subcutaneous continuous glucose monitor was also reliable for use in critically ill patients. The aim of this study was to compare the subcutaneous and intravenous continuous glucose monitors. This was an observational trial (UMIN-CTR, ID:000013338). We included patients who were admitted to our intensive care units (ICU) after hepato-biliary pancreatic surgery. Continuous blood glucose measurement was performed from the beginning of the operation to ICU discharge using the intravenous continuous monitor STG-55 (Nikkiso, Tokyo, Japan) and the subcutaneous continuous monitor iPro2 (Medtronic Japan, Tokyo, Japan). The STG-55 measured the glucose level in real time, and the iPro2 measured this every 5 min. We compared glucose levels obtained using the two devices every 5 min using a Bland–Altman plot and a regression analyses. A total of 3592 comparative samples in 15 cases were analyzed. The mean glucose level measured using the STG-55 was 139 ± 21 mg/dl, and that measured using the iPro2 was 144 ± 31 mg/dl. A linear regression line had the equation of the form y = 0.225x + 106. The coefficient of determination was 0.11, and the F-test significance level was set as p < 0.01. The mean of the differences was −5.2 mg/dl, with a 95 % agreement limit of −67 to + 57 mg/dL. The percent error was 44 %. In conclusion, the current study suggests that subcutaneous and intravenous continuous glucose monitoring was not highly correlated during either surgery or ICU stay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hanazaki K, Maeda H, Okabayashi T. Tight perioperative glycemic control using an artificial endocrine pancreas. Surg Today. 2010;40:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sebranek JJ, Lugli AK, Coursin DB. Glycaemic control in the perioperative period. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111(Suppl 1):i18–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Badawi O, Waite MD, Fuhrman SA, Zuckerman IH. Association between intensive care unit-acquired dysglycemia and in-hospital mortality. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:3180–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Egi M, Bellomo R, Stachowski E, French CJ, Hart GK, Taori G, Hegarty C, Bailey M. Hypoglycemia and outcome in critically ill patients. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85:217–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Mibu K, Yatabe T, Hanazaki K. Blood glucose control using an artificial pancreas reduces the workload of ICU nurses. J Artif Organ. 2012;15:71–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yatabe T, Yamazaki R, Kitagawa H, Okabayashi T, Yamashita K, Hanazaki K, Yokoyama M. The evaluation of the ability of closed-loop glycemic control device to maintain the blood glucose concentration in intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:575–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brunner R, Kitzberger R, Miehsler W, Herkner H, Madl C, Holzinger U. Accuracy and reliability of a subcutaneous continuous glucose-monitoring system in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:659–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sechterberger MK, van der Voort PH, Strasma PJ, DeVries JH. Accuracy of intra-arterial and subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring in postoperative cardiac surgery patients in the ICU. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015;9:663–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. van Hooijdonk RT, Leopold JH, Winters T, Binnekade JM, Juffermans NP, Horn J, Fischer JC, van Dongen-Lases EC, Schultz MJ. Point accuracy and reliability of an interstitial continuous glucose-monitoring device in critically ill patients: a prospective study. Crit Care. 2015;19:34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Vriesendorp TM, DeVries JH, Holleman F, Dzoljic M, Hoekstra JB. The use of two continuous glucose sensors during and after surgery. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2005;7:315–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yamashita K, Okabayashi T, Yokoyama T, Yatabe T, Maeda H, Manabe M, Hanazaki K. The accuracy of a continuous blood glucose monitor during surgery. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:160–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamashita K, Okabayashi T, Yokoyama T, Yatabe T, Maeda H, Manabe M, Hanazaki K. Accuracy and reliability of continuous blood glucose monitor in post-surgical patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53:66–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Signal M, Thomas F, Shaw GM, Chase JG. Complexity of continuous glucose monitoring data in critically ill patients: continuous glucose monitoring devices, sensor locations, and detrended fluctuation analysis methods. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7:1492–506.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. International Standards Organization. In vitro diagnostic test systems-requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing Diabetes mellitus. Reference number ISO 15197:2013. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2013.

  15. Jacobi J, Bircher N, Krinsley J, Agus M, Braithwaite SS, Deutschman C, Freire AX, Geehan D, Kohl B, Nasraway SA, Rigby M, Sands K, Schallom L, Taylor B, Umpierrez G, Mazuski J, Schunemann H. Guidelines for the use of an insulin infusion for the management of hyperglycemia in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:3251–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Douglas IS, Jaeschke R, Osborn TM, Nunnally ME, Townsend SR, Reinhart K, Kleinpell RM, Angus DC, Deutschman CS, Machado FR, Rubenfeld GD, Webb SA, Beale RJ, Vincent JL, Moreno R. Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including the Pediatric Subgroup. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:580–637.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ellis MF, Benjamin K, Cornell M, Decker K, Farrell D, McGugan L, Porter GP, Shearin H, Zhao Y, Granger BB. Suitability of capillary blood glucose analysis in patients receiving vasopressors. Am J Crit Care. 2013;22:423–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kanji S, Buffie J, Hutton B, Bunting PS, Singh A, McDonald K, Fergusson D, McIntyre LA, Hebert PC. Reliability of point-of-care testing for glucose measurement in critically ill adults. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:2778–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. DuBose JJ, Inaba K, Branco BC, Barmparas G, Lam L, Teixeira PG, Belzberg H, Demetriades D. Discrepancies between capillary glucose measurements and traditional laboratory assessments in both shock and non-shock states after trauma. J Surg Res. 2012;178:820–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Boom DT, Sechterberger MK, Rijkenberg S, Kreder S, Bosman RJ, Wester JP, van Stijn I, DeVries JH, van der Voort PH. Insulin treatment guided by subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring compared to frequent point-of-care measurement in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2014;18:453.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Maeda H, Okabayashi T, Nishimori I, Yamashita K, Sugimoto T, Hanazaki K. Hyperglycemia during hepatic resection: continuous monitoring of blood glucose concentration. Am J Surg. 2010;199:8–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yatabe T, Kitagawa H, Kawano T, Munekage M, Okabayashi T, Yamashita K, Hanazaki K, Yokoyama M. Continuous monitoring of glucose levels in the hepatic vein and systemic circulation during the Pringle maneuver in beagles. J Artif Organ. 2011;14:232–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cengiz E, Tamborlane WV. A tale of two compartments: interstitial versus blood glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009;11(Suppl 1):S11–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wernerman J, Desaive T, Finfer S, Foubert L, Furnary A, Holzinger U, Hovorka R, Joseph J, Kosiborod M, Krinsley J, Mesotten D, Nasraway S, Rooyackers O, Schultz MJ, Van Herpe T, Vigersky RA, Preiser JC. Continuous glucose control in the ICU: report of a 2013 round table meeting. Crit Care. 2014;18:226.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Masaya Munekage or Tomoaki Yatabe.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Munekage, M., Yatabe, T., Sakaguchi, M. et al. Comparison of subcutaneous and intravenous continuous glucose monitoring accuracy in an operating room and an intensive care unit. J Artif Organs 19, 159–166 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-015-0877-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-015-0877-2

Keywords

Navigation