Abstract
Introduction
The absence of a standardized classification scheme for ventral hernias hinders comparisons within the literature, indirectly delaying meaningful discussions regarding technique. We aimed to generate a comprehensive staging system that stratifies patients by risk of developing wound morbidity and hernia recurrence.
Methods
Our prospective database of all ventral hernia repairs (2006–2013) was reviewed with no exclusion based on technique or prosthetic. The presence of patient comorbidities, contamination and hernia dimensions—width/location on computed topography—was evaluated to identify variables most closely associated with surgical site occurrence (SSO) and recurrence. Predicted odds ratios and relative hazards, for SSO and recurrence, respectively, were used to partition patients into stages corresponding with increasing levels of risk.
Results
Hernia width (OR 2.24, HR 1.73) and the presence of contamination (OR 1.81, HR 2.04) were most significantly associated with increased risk of SSO and recurrence, while hernia location and the presence of comorbidities were not. Stage I hernias are <10 cm/clean and associated with low SSO and recurrence risk. Stage II hernias are 10–20 cm/clean or <10 cm contaminated and carry an intermediate risk of SSO and recurrence. Stage III hernias are either ≥10/contaminated or any hernia ≥20 cm, and these are associated with high SSO and recurrence risk. Stages I–III carry a concordance index of 0.67 for SSO and 0.61 for recurrence.
Conclusion
Hernia width and wound class can be used to stratify patients into stages (I–III) with increasing risk of wound morbidity and recurrence. This can be the foundation for future inclusion and exclusion criteria.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Malangoini MA, Rosen MJ (2012) Hernias. In: Townsend CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL (eds) Sabiston textbook of surgery, 19th edn. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia
Muysoms FE et al (2009) Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia 13(4):407–414
Ventral Hernia Working Group et al (2010) Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery 148(3):544–558
Kanters AE et al (2012) Modified hernia grading scale to stratify surgical site occurrence after open ventral hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg 215(6):787–793
Muysoms F et al (2012) EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repair. Hernia 16(3):239–250
Sobin LH (2003) TNM: evolution and relation to other prognostic factors. Semin Surg Oncol 21(1):3–7
Sobin LH (2001) TNM: principles, history, and relation to other prognostic factors. Cancer 91(8 Suppl):1589–1592
Horan TC et al (1992) CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 13(10):606–608
Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB (1996) Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 15(4):361–387
Rogmark P et al (2013) Short-term outcomes for open and laparoscopic midline incisional hernia repair: a randomized multicenter controlled trial: the ProLOVE (prospective randomized trial on open versus laparoscopic operation of ventral eventrations) trial. Ann Surg 258(1):37–45
Slater NJ et al (2014) Criteria for definition of a complex abdominal wall hernia. Hernia 18(1):7–17
Stoppa RE (1989) The treatment of complicated groin and incisional hernias. World J Surg 13(5):545–554
Dietz UA et al (2007) An alternative classification of incisional hernias enlisting morphology, body type and risk factors in the assessment of prognosis and tailoring of surgical technique. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 60(4):383–388
Chevrel JP, Rath AM (2000) Classification of incisional hernias of the abdominal wall. Hernia 4:7–11
Nyhus LM (2004) Classification of groin hernia: milestones. Hernia 8(2):87–88
Korenkov M et al (2001) Classification and surgical treatment of incisional hernia. Results of an experts’ meeting. Langenbecks Arch Surg 386(1):65–73
Ammaturo C, Bassi G (2005) The ratio between anterior abdominal wall surface/wall defect surface: a new parameter to classify abdominal incisional hernias. Hernia 9(4):316–321
Anthony T et al (2000) Factors affecting recurrence following incisional herniorrhaphy. World J Surg 24(1):95–100 (discussion 101)
Hadeed JG et al (2011) Complex abdominal wall hernias: a new classification system and approach to management based on review of 133 consecutive patients. Ann Plast Surg 66(5):497–503
Lee J et al (2013) Laparoscopic vs open ventral hernia repair in the era of obesity. JAMA Surg 148(8):723–726
Hermanek P, Gospodarowicz MK, Henson DE, Hutter RVP, Sobin LH (eds) (1995) International Union Against Cancer (UICC): prognostic factors in cancer. Springer, New York
Conflict of interest
C. C. P. declares no conflict of interest. C. P. O. declares no conflict of interest. C. N. C. declares no conflict of interest. M. J. R. declares relevant financial activity outside the submitted work—C. R. Bard for personal fees as a speaker and W. L. Gore for a Grant associated with a Prospective study (see updated ICMJE).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Petro, C.C., O’Rourke, C.P., Posielski, N.M. et al. Designing a ventral hernia staging system. Hernia 20, 111–117 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1418-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1418-x