Skip to main content
Log in

A purse-string suture at the level of internal inguinal ring, taking only the peritoneum leaving the distal sac: is it enough for inguinal hernia in pediatric patients?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Comment to this article was published on 28 December 2015

Abstract

Purpose

Although laparoscopic surgery in children has expanded in recent years. Laparoscopic hernia repair in children is still debatable. We aimed to summarize and describe our results of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and techniques among children.

Methods

Between March 2011 and April 2013, 98 children (67 male, 31 female) underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair at the department of surgery. The clinical outcomes were collected retrospectively.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 22.6 months. Twelve patients were ex-premature infants and a contralateral patent processus vaginalis (PPV) was present in 37 of the 91 unilateral inguinal hernia patients. There were two postoperative complications (transient hydrocele, umbilical port site infection). The mean operative time was 46 min. Recurrence, metachronous hernia and testicular atrophy were not observed during the follow-up period.

Conclusions

Our preliminary experiences suggest that the laparoscopic purse-string suture of internal inguinal opening of hernia sac could be a safe, effective, and reliable alternative for management of pediatric inguinal hernia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang KS (2012) Assessment and management of inguinal hernia in infants. Pediatrics 130:768–773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kl Chan, Hui WC, Tam PK (2005) Prospective randomized single-center, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic vs open repair of pediatric inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 19:927–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schier F (2006) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair-a prospective personal series of 542 children. J Pediatr Surg 41:1081–1084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yj Boo, Han HJ, Ji WB et al (2012) Laparoscopic hernia sac transection and intracorporeal ligation show very low recurrence rate in pediatric inguinal hernia. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22:720–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mk Abraham, Nasir AA, Puzhankara R et al (2012) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children: a single-centre experience over 7 years. Afr J Paediatr Surg 9:137–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang YT, Lin JY, Lee JY et al (2012) Comparative mid-term results between inguinal herniotomy and single-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy for pediatric inguinal hernia. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:526–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Guner YS, Emami CN, Chokshi NK et al (2010) Inversion herniotomy: a laparoscopic technique for female inguinal hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20:481–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Molina VME, Sanchez AA, Aguilar CR (2012) Laparoscopic assisted percutaneous treatment of inguinal hernia in infants. Cir Pediatr 25:4–8

    Google Scholar 

  9. Puri P, Guiney EJ, O’Donnell B (1984) Inguinal hernia in infants: the fate of the testis following incarceration. J Pediatr Surg 19:44–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rescorla FJ, Grosfeld JL (1984) Inguinal hernia repair in the perinatal period and early infancy: clinical considerations. J Pediatr Surg 19:832–837

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schier F (1998) Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in girls. J Pediatr Surg 33:1495–1497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Janetschek G, Reissigl A, Bartsch G (1994) Laparoscopic repair of pediatric hydroceles. J Endourol 8:415–417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Marte A, Sabatino MD, Borrelli M et al (2009) Decreased recurrence rate in the laparoscopic herniorraphy in children: comparison between two techniques. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19:259–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yip KF, Tam PK, Li MK (2004) Laparoscopic flip-flap hernioplasty: an innovative technique for pediatric hernia surgery. Surg Endosc 18:1126–1129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Harrison MR, Lee H, Albanese CT et al (2005) Subcutaneous endoscopically assisted ligation (SEAL) of the internal ring for repair of inguinal hernias in children: a novel technique. J Pediatr Surg 40:1177–1180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rowe MI, Copelson LW, Clatworthy HW (1969) The patent processus vaginalis and the inguinal hernia. J Pediatr Surg 4:102–107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Holcomb GW 3rd, Morgan WM, Brock JW et al (1996) Laparoscopic evaluation for contralateral patent processus vaginalis: Part II. J Pediatr Surg 31:1170–1173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Geisler DP, Jegathesan S, Parmley MC et al (2001) Laparoscopic exploration for the clinically undetected hernia in infancy and childhood. Am J Surg 182:693–696

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. McGregor DB, Halverson K, McVay CB (1980) The unilateral pediatric inguinal hernia: Should the contralateral side by explored? J Pediatr Surg 15:313–317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ein SH, Njere I, Ein A (2006) Six thousand three hundred sixty-one pediatric inguinal hernias: a 35-year review. J Pediatr Surg 41:980–986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zendejas B, Zarroug AE, Erben YM et al (2010) Impact of childhood inguinal hernia repair in adulthood: 50 years of follow-up. J Am Coll Surg 211:762–768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gilbert M, Clatworthy HW Jr (1959) Bilateral operations for inguinal hernia and hydrocele in infancy and childhood. Am J Surg 97:255–259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Koivusalo AI, Korpela R, Wirtavuori K et al (2009) A single-blinded, randomized comparison of laparoscopic versus open hernia repair in children. Pediatrics 123:332–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang C, Zhang H, Pu J et al (2011) Laparoscopic vs open herniorrhaphy in the management of pediatric inguinal hernia: a systemic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg 46:1824–1834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dutta S, Albanese C (2009) Transcutaneous laparoscopic hernia repair in children: a prospective review of 275 hernia repairs with minimum 2-year follow-up. Surg Endosc 23:103–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schier F, Montupet P, Esposito C (2002) Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy in children: a three-center experience with 933 repairs. J Pediatr Surg 37:395–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Phelps S, Agrawal M (1997) Morbidity after neonatal inguinal herniotomy. J Pediatr Surg 32:445–447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nagraj S, Sinha S, Grant H et al (2006) The incidence of complications following primary inguinal herniotomy in babies weighing 5 kg or less. Pediatr Surg Int 22:500–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

W. C., D. L., Y. B., B. K., M. O, declares no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Y. Choi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, D.Y., Baik, Y.H., Kwak, B.S. et al. A purse-string suture at the level of internal inguinal ring, taking only the peritoneum leaving the distal sac: is it enough for inguinal hernia in pediatric patients?. Hernia 19, 607–610 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1348-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1348-7

Keywords

Navigation