Abstract
Objectives
This split-mouth randomized, single-blind clinical trial evaluated the gingival irritation (GI) of at-home bleaching with individual trays of different cutouts, as well as the tooth sensitivity (TS) and color change.
Materials and methods
One hundred and twenty patients were randomized as to which side would receive the type of bleaching tray cutout: scalloped (in the gingival margin) and nonscalloped (extended from the gingival margin). The at-home bleaching was performed for 30 min with 10% hydrogen peroxide (HP) for 2 weeks. The absolute risk and intensity of GI and TS were assessed with a visual analog scale. Color change was assessed using a digital spectrophotometer and a color guide (α = 0.05).
Results
The proportion of patients who experienced GI was 57.5% (odds ratio 95% CI = 1.1 [0.7 to 1.8]), with no significant difference between groups (p = 0.66). The proportion of patients who experienced TS was 64.1% (odds ratio 95% CI = 1.0 [0.6 to 1.6]), with no significant difference between groups (p = 1.0). There is equivalence of scalloped and noscalloped groups for GI intensity (p < 0.01). Significant whitening was detected for both groups. Although some differences were observed between groups (CIELab and CIEDE00; p < 0.02), these were below of the considered clinically noticeable.
Conclusions
The different cutouts of trays proved to be equivalent when regarding gengival irritation and tooth sensitivity when 10% HP for at-home bleaching was used. Significant color change was observed in both groups. However, significant differences detected between groups are not considered clinically noticeable.
Trial registration
Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (RBR-2s34685).
Clinical relevance
Scalloped or not, the individual trays for at-home bleaching could be considered a clinician’s decision.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nie J, Tian F-C, Wang Z-H, Yap AU, Wang X-Y (2017) Comparison of efficacy and outcome satisfaction between in-office and home teeth bleaching in Chinese patients. J Oral Sci 59:527–532. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.16-0636
Rodriguez-Martinez J, Valiente M, Sanchez-Martin MJ (2019) Tooth whitening: from the established treatments to novel approaches to prevent side effects. J Esthet Restor Dent 31:431–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12519
Meireles SS, Goettems ML, Dantas RV, Bona ÁD, Santos IS, Demarco FF (2014) Changes in oral health related quality of life after dental bleaching in a double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Dent 42:114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.022
Luque-Martinez I, Reis A, Schroeder M, Muñoz MA, Loguercio AD, Masterson D, Maia LC (2016) Comparison of efficacy of tray-delivered carbamide and hydrogen peroxide for at-home bleaching: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 20:1419–1433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1863-7
Haywood VB, Sword RJ (2021) Tray bleaching status and insights. J Esthet Restor Dent 33:27–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12688
Bernardon JK, Sartori N, Ballarin A, Perdigão J, Lopes G, Baratieri LN (2010) Clinical performance of vital bleaching techniques. Oper Dent 35:3–10. https://doi.org/10.2341/09-008CR
Matis BA (2003) Tray whitening: what the evidence shows. Compend Contin Educ Dent 24:354–362
Basting RT, Amaral FL, França FM, Flório FM (2012) Clinical comparative study of the effectiveness of and tooth sensitivity to 10% and 20% carbamide peroxide home-use and 35% and 38% hydrogen peroxide in-office bleaching materials containing desensitizing agents. Oper Dent 37:464–473. https://doi.org/10.2341/11-337-C
Zekonis R, Matis BA, Cochran MA, Al Shetri SE, Eckert GJ, Carlson TJ (2003) Clinical evaluation of in-office and at-home bleaching treatments. Oper Dent 28:114–121
Cordeiro D, Toda C, Hanan S, Arnhold LP, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bandeira MCL (2019) Clinical evaluation of different delivery methods of at-home bleaching gels composed of 10% hydrogen peroxide. Oper Dent 44:13–23. https://doi.org/10.2341/17-174-C
Dourado Pinto AV, Carlos NR, Amaral F, França FMG, Turssi CP, Basting RT (2019) At-home, in-office and combined dental bleaching techniques using hydrogen peroxide: randomized clinical trial evaluation of effectiveness, clinical parameters and enamel mineral content. Am J Dent 32:124–132
Kielbassa AM, Maier M, Gieren AK, Eliav E (2015) Tooth sensitivity during and after vital tooth bleaching: a systematic review on an unsolved problem. Quintessence Int 46:881–897. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a34700
Briso ALF, Rahal V, Gallinari MO, Soares DG, de Souza Costa CA (2016) Complications from the use of peroxides. In: Perdigão J (ed) Tooth whitening, pp 45–80
Bruzell EM, Pallesen U, Thoresen NR, Wallman C, Dahl JE (2013) Side effects of external tooth bleaching: a multi-centre practice-based prospective study. Br Dent J 215:E17. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.1047
Li Y (2011) Safety controversies in tooth bleaching. Dent Clin North Am 55:255–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2011.01.003
Martini EC, Favoreto MW, Coppla FM, Loguercio AD, Reis A (2020) Evaluation of reservoirs in bleaching trays for at-home bleaching: a split-mouth single-blind randomized controlled equivalence trial. J App Oral Sci 28:e20200332. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0332
Morgan S, Jum’ah AA, Brunton P (2015) Assessment of efficacy and post-bleaching sensitivity of home bleaching using 10% carbamide peroxide in extended and non-extended bleaching trays. Br Dent J 218:579-82https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.391
Mailart MC, Sakassegawa PA, Torres C, Palo RM, Borges AB (2020) Assessment of peroxide in saliva during and after at-home bleaching with 10% carbamide and hydrogen peroxide gels: a clinical crossover trial. Oper Dent 45:368–376. https://doi.org/10.2341/19-127-C
Piaggio G, Elbourne D, Pocock S, Evans SJJ, Altman DG (2012) Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement. JAMA 308:2594–2604. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.87802
Pandis N, Chung B, Scherer RW, Elbourne D, Altman DG (2019) CONSORT 2010 statement: extension checklist for reporting within person randomised trials. Br J Dermatol 180:534–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17239
Vaez SC, Acc C, Santana TR, Mlc S, Peixoto AC, Leal PC, Faria-e-Silva AL (2019) Is a single preliminary session of in-office bleaching beneficial for the effectiveness of at-home tooth bleaching? A randomized controlled clinical trial. Oper Dent 44:E180–E189. https://doi.org/10.2341/18-196-C
Sutil E, Silva KL, Terra RMO, Burey A, Rezende M, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2020) Effectiveness and adverse effects of at-home dental bleaching with 37% versus 10% carbamide peroxide: a randomized, blind clinical trial. J Esthet Restor Dent. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12677
Haywood VB (1997) Nightguard vital bleaching: current concepts and research. J Am Dent Assoc 128:19S-25S. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1997.0416
da Costa JB, McPharlin R, Hilton T, Ferracane JI, Wang M (2012) Comparison of two at-home whitening products of similar peroxide concentration and different delivery methods. Oper Dent 37:333–339. https://doi.org/10.2341/11-053-C
Chemin K, Rezende M, Loguercio AD, Reis A, Kossatz S (2018) Effectiveness of and dental sensitivity to at-home bleaching with 4% and 10% hydrogen peroxide: a randomized, triple-blind clinical trial. Oper Dent 43:232–240. https://doi.org/10.2341/16-260-C
Mailart MC, Sakassegawa PA, Santos KC, Torres CRG, Palo RM, Borges AB (2021) One-year follow-up comparing at-home bleaching systems outcomes and the impact on patient’s satisfaction: randomized clinical trial. J Esthet Restor Dent. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12814
De L’Eclairage CI (1978) Recommendations on uniform color spaces, color-difference equations, psychometric color terms. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1520-6378.1977.tb00102.x
Luo MR, Cui G, Rigg B (2001) The development of the CIE 2000 colour-difference formula: CIEDE2000. Color Res Appl 26:340–350. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.1049
Pérez Mdel M, Ghinea R, Rivas MJ, Yebra A, Ionescu AM, Paravina RD, Herrera LJ (2016) Development of a customized whiteness index for dentistry based on CIELAB color space. Dent Mater 32:461–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.12.008
International Organization for Standardization (2016) ISO TR 28642 Dentistry: Guidance on Colour Measurement. https://www.iso.org/standard/69046.html
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D (2010) CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials 11https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32
Lesaffre E, Philstrom B, Needleman I, Worthington H (2009) The design and analysis of split-mouth studies: what statisticians and clinicians should know. Stat Med 28:3470–3482. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3634
Pinto M, Gonçalves M, Mota A, Deana AM, Olivan S, Bortoletto C, Godoy C, Vergilio K, Altavista O, Motta L, Bussadori S (2017) Controlled clinical trial addressing teeth whitening with hydrogen peroxide in adolescents: a 12-month follow-up. Clinics 72:161–170. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2017(03)06
Carlos NR, Bridi EC, Amaral F, França F, Turssi CP, Basting RT (2017) Efficacy of home-use bleaching agents delivered in customized or prefilled disposable trays: a randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent 42:30–40. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-315-C
Parreiras SO, Favoreto MW, Cruz GP, Gomes A, Borges CPF, Loguercio AD, Reis A (2020) Initial and pulp chamber concentration of hydrogen peroxide using different bleaching products. Brazilian Dental Science 23. https://doi.org/10.14295/bds.2020.v23i2.1942
Kwon SR, Wertz PW (2015) Review of the mechanism of tooth whitening. J Esthet Restor Dent 27:240–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12152
Chemin K, Rezende M, Costa MC, Salgado A, de Geus JL, Loguercio AD, Reis A, Kossatz S (2021) Evaluation of at-home bleaching times on effectiveness and sensitivity with 10% hydrogen peroxide: a randomized controlled double-blind clinical trial. Oper Dent. https://doi.org/10.2341/20-104-C
Silva LM, da Costa Lacerda ÍA, Dos Santos DB, Herkrath FJ, da Silva KL, Loguercio AD, de Moura Martins L (2021) Is the at-home bleaching treatment applied only on the lingual surface as effective as that on the buccal surface? A randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04128-8
Paul S, Peter A, Pietrobon N, Hämmerle CHF (2002) Visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth. J Dent Rest 81:578–582. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910208100815
Paravina RD, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, Bona AD, Igiel C, Linninger M, Sakai M, Takahashi H, Tashkandi E, Perez Mdel M (2015) Color difference thresholds in dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent 27(Suppl 1):S1-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12149
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank FGM Dental Group for the generous donation of the bleaching products employed in this study.
Funding
This study was partially supported by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) under grants 303332/2017–4 and 308286/2019–7 and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001.
Ethical approval.
The clinical investigation was approved (4.383.682) by the scientific review committee and by the committee for the protection of human participants of the State University of Ponta Grossa and was conducted in accordance with the protocol established by the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement with extension for within-person designs. All persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study were omitted. It was registered in the Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br) under the identification number RBR-2s34685.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Informed consent
All persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study were omitted.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carneiro, T.S., Favoreto, M.W., Bernardi, L.G. et al. Gingival irritation in patients submitted to at-home bleaching with different cutouts of the bleaching tray: a randomized, single-blind clinical trial. Clin Oral Invest 26, 4381–4390 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04401-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04401-4