Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of cleaning methods on the bond strength of resin cement to saliva-contaminated lithium disilicate ceramic

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of the present study was to examine the influence of different cleaning methods on the bond strength of resin cement to saliva-contaminated lithium disilicate ceramic.

Materials and methods

Lithium disilicate ceramic specimens (n = 8/group) were etched with 5% hydrofluoric acid (HF) to comprise the control group. After or before saliva contamination, specimens were cleaned with one of five methods: rinsing with water-spray (WS), K etchant GEL (PA), Ivoclean (IC), AD Gel (ADG), or application of a silane coupling agent before immersion in saliva (SCA). Stainless steel rods were bonded to the ceramic with resin cement. The tensile bond strength was measured after 24 h (TC0) and after thermal cycling at 4–60 °C (TC20000). Specimen surfaces were also evaluated using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (α = 0.05).

Results

Both the cleaning method (p = 0.0001) and storage condition (p = 0.0001) significantly affected the bond strength results. Before or after TCs, no significant differences in bond strength were observed between the control group and the other cleaning groups except for the WS group, which had a significantly lower bond strength than did the PA, IC, ADG, or SCA groups (p < 0.05). The level of nitrogen in the ADG group was almost equal to that in the control group.

Conclusions

WS cleaning did not restore the bond strength of resin cement to saliva-contaminated lithium disilicate ceramic etched with HF, while PA, IC, ADG, and SCA all benefited.

Clinical relevance

Lithium disilicate ceramic restorations etched with HF should to be cleaned with ADG after saliva contamination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blatz MB (2002) Long-term clinical success of all-ceramic posterior restorations. Quintessence Int 33(6):415–426

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Della Bona A, Anusavice KJ, Shen C (2000) Microtensile strength of composite bonded to hot-pressed ceramics. J Adhes Dent 2(4):305–313

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Borges GA, Sophr AM, de Goes MF, Sobrinho LC, Chan DC (2003) Effect of etching and airborne particle abrasion on the microstructure of different dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 89(5):479–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Addison O, Marquis PM, Fleming GJ (2007) Resin elasticity and the strengthening of all-ceramic restorations. J Dent Res 86(5):519–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Özcan M, Villitu PK (2003) Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cements to ceramics. Dent Mater 19(8):725–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Söderholm KJ, Shang SW (1993) Molecular orientation of silane at the surface of colloidal silica. J Dent Res 72(6):1050–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tenovuo J, Lagerlöf F (1994) Saliva. In: Thylstrup A, Fejerskov O (eds) Textbook of clinical cariology. Munksgærd, Copenhagen, pp 17–43

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baier RE, Glantz PO (1978) Characterization of oral in vivo films formed on different types of solid surfaces. Acta Odontol Scand 36(5):289–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hannig M (1997) Transmission electron microscopic study of in vivo pellicle formation on dental restorative materials. Eur J Oral Sci 105(5):422–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Milleding P, Carlen A, Wennerberg A, Karlsson S (2001) Protein characterization of salivary and plasma biofilm formed in vitro on non-corroded and corroded dental ceramic materials. Biomaterials 22(18):2545–2555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nicholls JI (1988) Tensile bond of resin cements to porcelain veneers. J Prosthet Dent 60(4):443–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Della Bona A, Northeast SE (1994) Shear bond strength of resin bonded ceramic after different try-in procedures. J Dent 22(2):103–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Aboush YE (1998) Removing saliva contamination from porcelain veneers before bonding. J Prosthet Dent 80(6):649–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Klosa K, Wolfart S, Lehmann F, Wenz HJ, Kern M (2009) The effect of storage conditions, contamination modes and cleaning procedures on the resin bond strength to lithium disilicate ceramic. J Adhes Dent 11(2):127–135

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Özcan M, Allahbeickaraghi A, Dundar M (2012) Possible hazardous effects of hydrofluoric acid and recommendations for treatment approach: a review. Clin Oral Investig 16(1):15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nikolaus F, Wolkewitz M, Hahn P (2013) Bond strength of composite resin to glass ceramic after saliva contamination. Clin Oral Investig 17(3):751–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Aladağ A, Elter B, Çömlekoğlu E, Kanat B, Sonugelen M, Kesercioğlu A, Özcan M (2015) Effect of different cleaning regiments on the adhesion of resin to saliva-contaminated ceramics. J Prosthodont 24(2):136–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoshida F, Tsujimoto A, Ishi R, Nojiri K, Takamizawa T, Miyazaki M, Latta MA (2015) Influence of surface treatment of contaminated lithium disilicate and leucite glass ceramics on surface free energy and bond strength of universal adhesives. Dent Mater J 34(6):855–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Borges ALS, Posritong S, Özcan M, Campos F, Melo R, Bottino MC (2017) Can cleaning regiments effectively eliminate saliva contamination from lithium disilicate ceramic surface? Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 25(1):9–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Morresi AL, D’Amario M, Capogreco M, Gatto R, Marzo G, D’Arcangelo C, Monaco A (2014) Thermal cycling for restorative materials: does a standard protocol exist in laboratory testing? A literature review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 29:295–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gale MS, Darvell BW (1999) Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 27(2):89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yoshida K, Matsumura H, Atsuta M (1990) Monomer composition and bond strength of light-cured 4-META opaque resin. J Dent Res 69(3):849–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Staninec M, Kawakami M (1993) Adhesion and microleakage tests of a new dentin bonding system. Dent Mater 9(3):204–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hakimeh S, Vaidyanathan J, Houpt ML, Vaidyanathan TK, Von Hagen S (2000) Microleakage of compomer class V restorations: effect of load cycling, thermal cycling, and cavity shape differences. J Prosthet Dent 83(2):194–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bock T, Özcan M (2015) Protocol for removal of clinically relevant contaminants from glass ceramic-based restorations. J Adhes Dent 17(5):474–475

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Eliades G, Palaghias G, Vougiouklakis G (1997) Effect of acidic conditioners on dentin morphology, molecular composition and collagen conformation in situ. Dent Mater 13(1):24–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Spencer HR, Ike V, Brennan PA (2007) Review: the use of sodium hypochlorite in endodontics- potential complications and their management. Br Dent J 202(9):555–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yoshida K (2018) Influence of cleaning methods on resin bonding to saliva-contaminated zirconia. J Esthet Restor Dent 30(3):259–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Del Carpio-Perochena AE, Bramante CM, Duarte MA, Cavenago BC, Villas-Boas MH, Graeff MS, Bernardineli N, de Andrade FB, Ordinola-Zapata R (2011) Biofilm dissolution and cleaning ability of different irrigant solutions on intraorally infected dentin. J Endod 37(8):1134–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keiichi Yoshida.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoshida, K. Influence of cleaning methods on the bond strength of resin cement to saliva-contaminated lithium disilicate ceramic. Clin Oral Invest 24, 2091–2097 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03074-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03074-w

Keywords

Navigation